xtal
xtal
#1
Posted 12 April 2012 - 08:49 AM
#2
Posted 12 April 2012 - 08:52 AM
#3
Posted 12 April 2012 - 08:58 AM
#4
Posted 12 April 2012 - 11:22 AM
#5
Posted 12 April 2012 - 06:13 PM
#6
Posted 12 April 2012 - 06:32 PM
#7
Posted 12 April 2012 - 06:34 PM
#8
Posted 12 April 2012 - 06:35 PM
#9
Posted 12 April 2012 - 06:37 PM
so how is it pronounced? crystal?
#10
Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:01 PM
#11
Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:08 PM
yes, it is an abbreviation for a crystal oscillator, a common component in lots of electronic devices
http://en.wikipedia....stal_oscillator
#12
Posted 12 April 2012 - 09:01 PM
where's Tha?
#13
Posted 12 April 2012 - 11:29 PM
#14
Posted 13 April 2012 - 04:18 AM
Then there's the coloured calces, or to put it another way, the audax powders.
But surely this is to be expected with instrumental music; there's no catchy line in the chorus for you to name a given track after.
#15
Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:58 PM
#16
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:34 AM
#17
Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:13 AM
#18
Posted 14 April 2012 - 07:20 AM
i think there is artistic merit to the names of his tracks. i dont know what the term for word art is but i think he has a sense of word art. Xtal is the perfect name for that track. It sounds like it looks
http://en.wikipedia....iki/Cellar_door
#19
Posted 14 April 2012 - 08:53 AM
#20
Posted 15 April 2012 - 07:28 PM
i think there is artistic merit to the names of his tracks. i dont know what the term for word art is but i think he has a sense of word art. Xtal is the perfect name for that track. It sounds like it looks
http://en.wikipedia....iki/Cellar_door
am i the only person who doesnt understand this cellar door shit?
But in terms of Aphex the article hits the nail on the head.
#21
Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:55 PM
Xtal (crystal oscillator) is certainly in fitting with Schottkey 7th Path (as in Schottky diode) and Pulsewidth. I'm guessing that was about the time James was studying electrical engineering? It sounds like he tinkers around with synths a lot too, which is a nice way to get into that. It would appear he dislikes actually naming songs about as much as he likes making them, hence the weird array of barely pronouncable groups of items (place names; electronic components; computer viruses; acronyms).
Then there's the coloured calces, or to put it another way, the audax powders.
But surely this is to be expected with instrumental music; there's no catchy line in the chorus for you to name a given track after.
I think you have it all wrong. By naming the tracks after things he is experiencing at the time he actually is creating a story much more interesting than he can actually imagine. Now you have these series of track names based on the occurrences in his life and if you actually wanted to plot them chronologically you could get this really detailed idea of what he was experiencing at the time of each track. He also creates this wonderful unfolding story by giving each track its own significance without having to imagine it. It is more honest than most artists who sit back and try to give the names more meaning than they actually have. At the same time he conveys that it isn't the track name that really matters its the track itself, because he doesn't ( a lot of the time) take the time to come up with something that is supposed to be thoroughly determined. His track names are a total autobiography. Sometimes though they are funny or catchy or interesting, but in my opinion never wanky.
#22
Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:13 PM
i think there is artistic merit to the names of his tracks. i dont know what the term for word art is but i think he has a sense of word art. Xtal is the perfect name for that track. It sounds like it looks
http://en.wikipedia....iki/Cellar_door
am i the only person who doesnt understand this cellar door shit?
But in terms of Aphex the article hits the nail on the head.
hmmm...my opinion is that its just linguists trying to deconstruct everything. I can understand where they are coming from. Sit around and just say random words and try to think about how they sound and avoid thinking about their actually meaning. Think about how each words sounds when you say it over and over again. Which words do you prefer to hear? It is like listening to music. You prefer a certain arrangement of sounds versus a different arrangement. Its all the same series of notes just rearranged in different order. I think its is easier if you don't have a frame of reference for the meaning of the word. It is kind of like how people always think certain languages sound more beautiful than others. I think its a meaningless argument though. It's completely subjective. It is like arguing about your favorite color. It can be fun though.
For instance, one of the first words I thought of was "silhouette" and it turns out that it actually originated from a French person's last name. So, basically it is reinforcing the idea that French is a beautiful language.



