#1
Posted 22 April 2012 - 08:12 AM
I personally enjoy a couple of hours of non-existence/dreaming every night so have opted for 3-4 hours. I'd probably not go to bed at all some days but the most common thing i'd do would probably be 3-4 hours sleep so i've gone for that.
#2
Posted 22 April 2012 - 08:29 AM
But I wouldn't be completely without my nights sleep, I really enjoy sleeping/dreaming.
Edited by Npoess, 22 April 2012 - 08:38 AM.
#3
Posted 22 April 2012 - 08:44 AM
If they manage to ever discover and untangle what makes the brain tick to the extent that they could bypass sleep, I wonder what else they would have discovered alongside? Probably way more interesting things like stopping ageing.
It could be unhealthy to let a train of thought go uninterrupted for months or years, sleeplessness would create some real monsters.
#4
Posted 22 April 2012 - 08:47 AM
I wonder if we could figure out how to induce sleep in the way dolphins do it--one hemisphere of the brain at a time. That seems like a good compromise, because I doubt we'll ever develop a way to go totally without sleep.
#5
Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:17 AM
#6
Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:21 AM
the option would be good but i might end up sleeping the same amount.
#7
Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:38 AM
#8
Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:51 AM
#9
Posted 22 April 2012 - 12:08 PM
"If we could eliminate the need for sleep WITHOUT ANY DRAWBACKS"
Anyways I only sleep 4 hours a night on average so I'd probably go for that option.
#10
Posted 22 April 2012 - 01:19 PM
#11
Posted 22 April 2012 - 01:20 PM
#12
Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:00 PM
genetically advanced freak...It's like some people don't even read the words that make up the question.
"If we could eliminate the need for sleep WITHOUT ANY DRAWBACKS"
Anyways I only sleep 4 hours a night on average so I'd probably go for that option.
can read questions properly, only needs 4 hours sleep and can throw a frisbee pretty well. jeez
edit: and catch a frisbee
Edited by tauboo, 22 April 2012 - 02:01 PM.
#13
Posted 22 April 2012 - 05:24 PM
I was initially going to put "no sleep" but I've only recently started getting regular dreams and I quite enjoy them. So, if it were possible to dream in as short a time as possible, I'd go for "1-2 hours".
#14
Posted 22 April 2012 - 06:01 PM
Edited by Zephyr_Nova, 22 April 2012 - 06:01 PM.
#15
Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:58 PM
#16
Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:24 PM
If I were immortal I'd probably sleep on occasion to switch things up, maybe.
I like the jib of your style
#17
Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:47 AM
#18
Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:02 AM
edit - wtf there is no all the time option.
edit - stupid poll.
edit - sexy.
#19
Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:05 AM
I'm inclined to go with this (aside from the 'clubbing' bit because I'm not a twat).i think i would save sleep for special occasions (like post sex or post clubbing), or sleep on sunday nights. I do enjoy sleeping but i could quite easily find a hundred things to be doing instead
If I never felt tired or maddening then I would preferably sleep as little as possible, but reserve a good session for post-sex, post-booze, post-drugs, post-exercise, post-intense day.
Damn it, Rambo, another of your questions that I wish were reality.
#20
Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:43 AM
#21
Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:53 AM
#22
Posted 23 April 2012 - 07:28 AM
Going 'clubbing' does.going to sleep after going to a club makes you a twat? interesting.
#23
Posted 23 April 2012 - 08:23 AM
#24
Posted 23 April 2012 - 08:29 AM
Apologies, actually. I just really hate the word 'clubbing', and I have a visual image of gurning, dirty teens shuffling around in sweaty, noisy holes. It's just a word and idea that disgusts me, but it doesn't make anyone a 'twat', so I apologise. If you're a person that goes 'clubbing' we wouldn't get along.Going 'clubbing' does.
going to sleep after going to a club makes you a twat? interesting.
I used to go to horrible noisy clubs and take drugs 'til morning, til I took an arrow to the knee.
#25
Posted 23 April 2012 - 08:33 AM
edit: nevermind



