Jump to content
IGNORED

Cute Pictures Thread


Guest bitroast

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Atom Dowry Firth

man, those hi-def gifs really make my browser chug

 

Yeah seriously. Thought it might be a Chrome compatibility issue at first but if I open the video in a new tab it runs really smoothly. Seems to be an issue with the way the forum is handling them? It's rendering threads almost unreadable for me and my internet connection is pretty decent

Edited by Timothy Forward
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

man, those hi-def gifs really make my browser chug

 

Yeah seriously. Thought it might be a Chrome compatibility issue at first but if I open the video in a new tab it runs really smoothly. Seems to be an issue with the way the forum is handling them? It's rendering threads almost unreadable for me and my internet connection is pretty decent

 

Same here, together with the Funny Pictures thread and other non-watmm sites. I don't see the point, why not just use a video instead of a silent gif? Must be a tumblr thing *rambles like an old man*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

man, those hi-def gifs really make my browser chug

 

Yeah seriously. Thought it might be a Chrome compatibility issue at first but if I open the video in a new tab it runs really smoothly. Seems to be an issue with the way the forum is handling them? It's rendering threads almost unreadable for me and my internet connection is pretty decent

 

Same here, together with the Funny Pictures thread and other non-watmm sites. I don't see the point, why not just use a video instead of a silent gif? Must be a tumblr thing *rambles like an old man*

 

 

I had the same problem even on a very powerful VMware/Scrypt rig, but fixed it by going back to the WATMM Classic (Fluid) theme. The Badger theme has transparency channels that significantly increase CPU/GPU load when scrolling pages with lots of HD graphics/animations. Now my WATMM media thread scrolling performance in Firefox and Chrome is >9000.

 

Edit: Oh, but you are having the problem on non-WATMM sites too, Jan... hmmm :(

Edited by jsmcpn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.