Jump to content

Rotwang

Knob Twiddlers
  • Posts

    700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rotwang

  1. My two cents on the music theory debate: personally I think the relationship between music and music theory is analogous to the relationship between the physical world and the academic discipline of physics. Of course the physical world came first, and the job of physical theories is to describe the world as it exists, not prescribe how the world should be. But theories of physics enables us to build things in the physical world that we wouldn't have thought to build without those theories. In the same way, music exists prior to music theory and the role of music theory is descriptive, but knowing music theory is nevertheless useful for musicians because it gives them ideas they might otherwise not have come up with.

    • Like 2
  2. On 4/25/2021 at 2:31 AM, splesh said:

    Alternate tracklist for Chiastic Slide:
    1. Cipater
    2. Cichli
    3. Pule
    4. Rettic Ac
    5. Hub
    6. Recury
    7. Calbruc
    8. Tewe
    9. Nuane

    The segue from Pule to Nuane is one of the best in their whole discography IMO, would be a shame to break that up.

    • Like 2
  3. 7 hours ago, modey said:

    lol fucking hell

    I mean, I'm genuinely sorry if he's autistic or something (I mean this sincerely) and interpreted my posts the wrong way.. but shit, some of the stuff he said really made it easy to joke about.

    Jeez, now I feel a bit guilty for arguing about whether Autechre secretly write all their music in FLStudio as well.

    • Like 1
  4. Great track. Personally I imagine I'd prefer it without the singing, the rest of it has its own identity but the vocal has strong Burial vibes. But then I don't much care for Burial so that's probably affecting my perception.

  5. This has a really nice chilled vibe to it. I find some of the percussion a bit confusing - the clicking noise that sounds a bit like vinyl static works well during the quiet passage that starts at the halfway point, but during the parts where the kick is present it seems to clash a bit with the other drum sounds and ends up sounding like clipping artifacts or something, if that makes sense?

  6. Interesting, thanks. I won't have access to my monitors this week but when I get a chance I'll see if I can figure out what's up with that and reupload if I can fix it.

    I didn't sum the low frequencies to mono like people often recommend - do you think that might help?

  7. The start of the track reminds me a bit of early Infected Mushroom, I like it. The high-pitched lead that starts at 1:25 could do with more timbral variation IMO, especially in the sections with no kick where it's carrying the track. Also I find the lead that starts at 2:23 a bit shrill.

    The bass with the huge filter sweeps that starts at 1:25 and again at 1:54 is my favourite part, I think it should be more prominent.

  8. Thanks for the feedback! I'm surprised to hear about the bass, I was worried that the track was too bassy if anything. Most of the bassline is concentrated in the low harmonics though so maybe it doesn't come through on headphones? I did try boosting the upper harmonics a bit when I was mixing  but didn't like the result, should probably have tried harder.

    I did make the image, yes. Was done with Python.

    Listening to the video you posted now, it's cool.

  9. Finally got round to listening to SIGN. Not a big fan of the Vangelis-esque sound design that's on a lot of it but there are some really beautiful moments. Be interesting to see how my perception changes over time, as it inevitably will.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  10. 22 hours ago, Wurstwasser said:

    Nah, not as harsh as you are saying.

    Programming stuff in Max and letting all the lights marketing shine on it. It helps maintaining a nerd status.

    I think I didn't say marketing is a bad thing.

    But you haven't given any reason to believe that it isn't true. Again: Autechre programming their own tools in Max isn't some outrageous thing that requires suspension of disbelief. So why should anyone take your word over theirs?

    • Like 1
  11. On 10/20/2020 at 9:39 AM, Wurstwasser said:
    On 10/19/2020 at 6:35 AM, azatoth said:

    Ah yes, you are the one that believe it's BS that they program their synths and effects in Max and they use some more "traditional" DAW. Gotcha.

    Yeah, you got me here. IDK. I rather think their production does not differ and did never differ too much from all other electronic musicians. The rest is just marketing for kids. But now we're adult. Sandpaper and tanks, anyone?

    This is a truly bizarre opinion. Rob and Sean have always come across as sincere and down-to-earth and yet you're accusing them of spending the last decade maintaining a lie - based on what? Even if they could have made all of their recent output with a regular DAW (debatable), why the hell wouldn't they program their own stuff in Max? Writing music software isn't that hard - I've done it, and I'm an amateur hobbyist with a day job - and it's obviously something that appeals to the sort of people who make nerdy electronic music. Who do you think uses tools like Max or develops new synths/effects anyway, if not people like Autechre?

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.