-
Posts
842 -
Joined
Previous Fields
-
Country
United States
Recent Profile Visitors
1,821 profile views
Satans Little Helper's Achievements
-
Where did he say he tells his clients their life may not be worth living? He says that many (half) of his clients who are suicidal don’t have mental pathologies, but are in a genuinely rough spot in their life (such that they think their life is not worth living). It wasn’t judgmental as far as I can tell. I honestly don’t get why the guy in the clip warranted a “this cunt”.
-
it's 2024 and we're still talking about the 2020 election. marvellous! perhaps if i don't vote this time there will be less talk about the 2024 election
- 6,450 replies
-
- 1
-
- Giuliani married his cousin
- attempted erection
- (and 3 more)
-
How does the World view America these days?
Satans Little Helper replied to Rubin Farr's topic in General Banter
"It also caused a decline in science" -
AI - The artificial intelligence thread
Satans Little Helper replied to YO303's topic in General Banter
Yes! As soon as you need to correct chatGPT it's over. And also, as soon as it starts to write a solution, but in the end starts to correct itself and completely starts over. Another red flag. That's when chatGPT starts to get weird. Often, in hindsight it's because the question was too broad and/or complex. Sometimes it can take me a day to get to the right set of questions. Really can't comment on your specific situation. Feeding it error messages might help. But I'm sure you've already tried that. Not telling you anything new, I'm afraid. It's just that my current intuition/experience about ChatGPT giving helpful code is about optimising the set of questions. And yes, you do need to define a problem. That's the art of it. Within a google challenge thats different to real life issues, obvsly. You need to "tell" ChatGPT what it needs to do. Not necessarily how, btw. It can produce the required algorithm all by itself. In the end, it's the proverbial "stochastic parrot" which returns the most probable sequence of words/code to an input. The input defines the output. -
AI - The artificial intelligence thread
Satans Little Helper replied to YO303's topic in General Banter
I have some pretty good experiences with using chatGPT (4,0) for writing functions so far though! But I've noticed it's a bit of an art to ask the right questions. Basically, the idea is that ChatGPT could give the right answer/code, IF it is being asked the right question. So you're searching for the right questions. And be careful to not ask too many questions in one session. Because the longer the chat, the worse ChatGPT performs. After a while, it does become rubbish. So basically, if you haven't got a good solution after three questions, you're better off starting over anew with a different approach. As opposed to keep on trying in the same chat. Because it will hallucinate after a while. A while ago a got an invitation for the Google Foobar challenge (which is a story in and of itself: https://itsmohitt.medium.com/things-you-should-know-about-google-foobar-invitation-703a535bf30f). And without much Python-experience I got ChatGPT to write the solutions successfully. After a bunch of successful challenges, I got asked if it was OK if a Google recruiter would approach me. But it ended there, because Google ended the Foobar challenge (https://foobar.withgoogle.com) That was just last month or so. Around February. Right around the time Google pushed their *woke* Gemini generative AI. And lost considerable value in the stock markets. And I guess they noticed themselves it was fairly easy to pass the Google Foobar challenge without much programming knowledge. (I do have a background in AI/Computer Science though. I'm just not into programming. I'd rather have ChatGPt generate the code for me) Possibly a combination of the two: they need to fire a lot of people, and their particular way of looking for the right people wasn't working because of ChatGPT. -
The "I'm old" is the new "I'm drunk" ! I agree though. /continues programming in LISP /gets cancelled
-
NOT Coronavirus COVID-19
Satans Little Helper replied to Satans Little Helper's topic in General Banter
LOL https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/mar/06/hypervaccinated-man-217-covid-jabs-no-side-effects-germany Allegedly, he's now working in Mega Man games as Magnet Man- 1,595 replies
-
- 3
-
- COVID
- Coronavirus
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
PROOF: A daily dose of bass is healthy for the mind! https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07132-6
- 18,431 replies
-
- 1
-
- Google Owns You
- YouTube
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
First (peer) review published by Nature! badum tsh
-
Morphology - Fractures [De:tuned]
Satans Little Helper replied to Detuned's topic in New & Upcoming Releases
Excellent -
Would You Pay to Access WATMM In Lieu of Advertisements?
Satans Little Helper replied to Joyrex's topic in General Banter
What about a discount for beards Or better, the opposite: the bigger the beard, the higher the fee. This place needs a little more diversity and inclusivity. All those whities with huge face beards. It’s like a giant sloth of . Cannot be healthy- 65 replies
-
- 2
-
- Future of WATMM
- Paying ones fair share
- (and 2 more)
-
yup. thx. and also, trump voters have their own truth. just like the rest of us. it's rather simple really. and it has little to do with logic. or rather, a different one. tiny edit: it's cynical, but it is what it is. @trying to be less rude you can facepalm me all you want, but again, you can't talk trump voters out of it. it's like a crazy cult. quite literally.
- 6,450 replies
-
- 2
-
- Giuliani married his cousin
- attempted erection
- (and 3 more)
-
that's a rather long rant to say you don't understand trump voters. that's fine though. but remember, if you'd actually understand them, you wouldn't be writing posts like this. (please note that understanding and agreeing are two very different things)
- 6,450 replies
-
- 2
-
- Giuliani married his cousin
- attempted erection
- (and 3 more)
-
AI - The artificial intelligence thread
Satans Little Helper replied to YO303's topic in General Banter
yup. sad but true /embarrassed civilian -
NOT Coronavirus COVID-19
Satans Little Helper replied to Satans Little Helper's topic in General Banter
I wouldn't worry too much about these results. The term "confirmed" basically tells you it is in line with previous results. It's just that there's more evidence for these rare events. That's basically it. Various guidelines (eg. WHO) already mentioned these. So nothing new. It does mention the results also showed some other signals for rare(r) events, but due to methodology issues these need to be confirmed. See:- 1,595 replies
-
- 3
-
- COVID
- Coronavirus
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with: