Jump to content

Satans Little Helper

Supporting Member
  • Posts

    841
  • Joined

Everything posted by Satans Little Helper

  1. it's 2024 and we're still talking about the 2020 election. marvellous! perhaps if i don't vote this time there will be less talk about the 2024 election
  2. Yes! As soon as you need to correct chatGPT it's over. And also, as soon as it starts to write a solution, but in the end starts to correct itself and completely starts over. Another red flag. That's when chatGPT starts to get weird. Often, in hindsight it's because the question was too broad and/or complex. Sometimes it can take me a day to get to the right set of questions. Really can't comment on your specific situation. Feeding it error messages might help. But I'm sure you've already tried that. Not telling you anything new, I'm afraid. It's just that my current intuition/experience about ChatGPT giving helpful code is about optimising the set of questions. And yes, you do need to define a problem. That's the art of it. Within a google challenge thats different to real life issues, obvsly. You need to "tell" ChatGPT what it needs to do. Not necessarily how, btw. It can produce the required algorithm all by itself. In the end, it's the proverbial "stochastic parrot" which returns the most probable sequence of words/code to an input. The input defines the output.
  3. I have some pretty good experiences with using chatGPT (4,0) for writing functions so far though! But I've noticed it's a bit of an art to ask the right questions. Basically, the idea is that ChatGPT could give the right answer/code, IF it is being asked the right question. So you're searching for the right questions. And be careful to not ask too many questions in one session. Because the longer the chat, the worse ChatGPT performs. After a while, it does become rubbish. So basically, if you haven't got a good solution after three questions, you're better off starting over anew with a different approach. As opposed to keep on trying in the same chat. Because it will hallucinate after a while. A while ago a got an invitation for the Google Foobar challenge (which is a story in and of itself: https://itsmohitt.medium.com/things-you-should-know-about-google-foobar-invitation-703a535bf30f). And without much Python-experience I got ChatGPT to write the solutions successfully. After a bunch of successful challenges, I got asked if it was OK if a Google recruiter would approach me. But it ended there, because Google ended the Foobar challenge (https://foobar.withgoogle.com) That was just last month or so. Around February. Right around the time Google pushed their *woke* Gemini generative AI. And lost considerable value in the stock markets. And I guess they noticed themselves it was fairly easy to pass the Google Foobar challenge without much programming knowledge. (I do have a background in AI/Computer Science though. I'm just not into programming. I'd rather have ChatGPt generate the code for me) Possibly a combination of the two: they need to fire a lot of people, and their particular way of looking for the right people wasn't working because of ChatGPT.
  4. The "I'm old" is the new "I'm drunk" ! I agree though. /continues programming in LISP /gets cancelled
  5. LOL https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/mar/06/hypervaccinated-man-217-covid-jabs-no-side-effects-germany Allegedly, he's now working in Mega Man games as Magnet Man
  6. PROOF: A daily dose of bass is healthy for the mind! https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07132-6
  7. First (peer) review published by Nature! badum tsh
  8. What about a discount for beards Or better, the opposite: the bigger the beard, the higher the fee. This place needs a little more diversity and inclusivity. All those whities with huge face beards. It’s like a giant sloth of . Cannot be healthy
  9. yup. thx. and also, trump voters have their own truth. just like the rest of us. it's rather simple really. and it has little to do with logic. or rather, a different one. tiny edit: it's cynical, but it is what it is. @trying to be less rude you can facepalm me all you want, but again, you can't talk trump voters out of it. it's like a crazy cult. quite literally.
  10. that's a rather long rant to say you don't understand trump voters. that's fine though. but remember, if you'd actually understand them, you wouldn't be writing posts like this. (please note that understanding and agreeing are two very different things)
  11. I wouldn't worry too much about these results. The term "confirmed" basically tells you it is in line with previous results. It's just that there's more evidence for these rare events. That's basically it. Various guidelines (eg. WHO) already mentioned these. So nothing new. It does mention the results also showed some other signals for rare(r) events, but due to methodology issues these need to be confirmed. See:
  12. That's the political reality in the US. A lot of folks - too many - don't want that to happen. That's not just the anti-tax lobby. Or big companies. Or their size. That's almost half the country supporting the anti-tax/american dream nonsense. Perhaps more than half the country. If American voters would support EU style policies, the world would be a different place.
  13. Thanks. Regarding those big companies: let them pay taxes fairly. If we all do, the circle goes round nicely. We all benefit.
  14. Out of curiosity: what would you argue? Personally, I couldn’t give a rats ass about LLM’s being trained on everything/anything I put on the internet. The internet is a public space. I put it there knowing it’s beyond my control what happens with it. And I find it funny how people are driven by the “Company X is making money from the stuff I put on the internet, they should pay me “ and that it would actually help if they got some money for it. For shits and giggles you should calculate your % of the total dataset LLMs are trained on. OpenAI should pay you less than a cent. Good luck with that. Note: I haven’t actually made the calculations, but it’s a safe bet that the data of a single individual is meaningless when compared to the whole. Note2: im not an artist putting work on the internet. And therefore, I don’t put value on anything I put on the internet. Imo, that doesn’t change when a company makes money from LLM’s. My online presence is just as useless now as it was 10 years ago. I understand there’s a bunch of people around here who are artists and who put their work online. There’s a different argument to be made there. And a valid one. But I don’t think that same argument should also apply to the nonsense I put online. Such as this post. Or anything on reddit. Seriously? out of curiosity: how many of you use wikipedia without contributions? How many use free online mail like gmail of hotmail for free? If you want openai/google and the likes to pay you, you might consider paying them back for all the other stuff you’ve been using for free.
  15. What do you mean? You want to be paid for using Reddit? Or do you want a fee from companies training LLMs on reddit data for creating content?
  16. +1 vote for most IDM 2024 watmm remix compilation 3…2…1 GO!
  17. spatial computing? is that the new apple thing? if so: lol...as if
  18. Short: yes. At the current fee of $3 a year, can't remember the amount tbh. But it's basically buying a beer for a year access. Can't see any harm in that. But it all depends on the "how much?" question. No brainer to me.
  19. I failed the "confirm you're human" test for the first time in my life! I had to put a point on an image telling where the end point for a car was. And it was an incomprehensible image. Consider this an existential crisis. In a couple of years ChatGPT outperforms me on the "confirm you're human" test. Perhaps it already does. I have failed as a human being... Unless the test will be something you need to fail because AI will somehow manage to be successful anyways. And now I'm a confused human being.
  20. also B12 remix and blue binary remix. very much on the melon collie side of things. like drowning in sentiments
  21. It's a classic, but the reflections on reflections (remix) album. ... man, that's a must as well. /timemachine to the nineties
  22. Have to side with aux on this one. I’m growing tired of people that need to sell books through multi hour podcasts. Making a bunch of alarmist comments to trigger a specific audience into buying their books. And as a subject ai is the gift that keeps on giving. And everybody has an opinion. Ai is for technology what Trump is for politics. #isaiditfirst </sarcasm>
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.