Jump to content

jhonny

Supporting Member
  • Posts

    3,109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jhonny

  1. ugh i really hope you guys are being sarcastic why? We had the blimp on Sat, the tracklist on Monday and now it's Wednesday and nothing concrete.i still don't know if you're serious like, how friggin entitled is that attitude? I wasn't being particularly serious, however getting cockteased by warp/rdj is a little tedious. I don't believe I'm entitled to an album or anything, but hype has been maximised over the last couple of days and people's bodies are ready! Time to deliver the goods I reckon...i think it's up to the content providers to decide when to deliver the goods. a little respect and patience for the artistic process is a virtue imo. it's great that you're so eager, it proves how much you love the afxness. it just seems like an unhealthy attitude is all. time goes so friggin quick we'll be digesting this delicious treat before we know it. I'm not really sensing any artistic process in this - it's pure marketing and PR by Warp. I guess the BOC hype-drive got them loads of pre-sales and t-shirt sales etc and so they're doing similar with this, but without any snippets, significant clues or whatever... we're just waiting for 'something'
  2. ugh i really hope you guys are being sarcastic why? We had the blimp on Sat, the tracklist on Monday and now it's Wednesday and nothing concrete. i still don't know if you're serious like, how friggin entitled is that attitude? I wasn't being particularly serious, however getting cockteased by warp/rdj is a little tedious. I don't believe I'm entitled to an album or anything, but hype has been maximised over the last couple of days and people's bodies are ready! Time to deliver the goods I reckon...
  3. ugh i really hope you guys are being sarcastic why? We had the blimp on Sat, the tracklist on Monday and now it's Wednesday and nothing concrete.
  4. hype is officially over... sorry AFX/Warp. Wake me up when something happens
  5. I'm not bothering with the back photo until it's clear that it's a clue and that the source is legitimate. Yeah joyrex has latched on but he could just be trolling.
  6. What will come first - a release date or a set of uk autechre dates?
  7. except TKOLs was poop i hate youHaha I remember the release too, it was great. Just personally found it to be a big letdown (no pun intended) and I'm a mega RH fan
  8. this is all getting a bit circular and shitty. we need some proper news or some info that this is another TH mystery with clearer clues.
  9. LOL one of the busiest days on WATMM ever and Papa breaks the site when changing the background! Gone super slow and weird for me now. ahh that's better seems to be sorted now. Thanks Joyrex!
  10. outstanding work as always Jason
  11. IIRC, TH hype used Zane Lowe/Radio 1. Wonder if something might be dropped tonight on his show.
  12. http://warp.net/records/aphex-twin is still there for me guess he means the warp front page, not the AFX page. I didn't notice it on the frontpage, but pretty sure the Aphex header didn't use to flash like that
  13. maybe just an ultra-subtle wink to say that this is official?
  14. I was just thinking that. Need to keep the momentum up. Time for a track...
  15. 25 pages in under 24 hours. Great work guys, keep it up!
  16. I don't think it's legit. Stupid taxidermy thing, american plug, RDJ doesn't strike me as a pizza scruff.
  17. lol the 7min mark is priceless. Some bits are quite good though!
  18. nah saw an article from them on their own pitchfork.com saying they somehow regret this rate and the context wasn't maybe appropriated. i think Pitchfork gonna start a cum competition and will cover their screen with load How long has Pitchfork been around, btw? Or, more specifically, when did they review Drukqs? i don't know for sure but at least a decade, i've seen the date of 2003 somewhere, maybe more thing is pitchfork have a weird way to do things, there are many contributors and they change quite often, they also seem to not cross over too much like they just just upload their review and never cross over Pitchfork lost it's way when it started retrospectively changing things, deleting reviews. Sure - review a re-issue or perhaps suggest it was a mistake, but you're a review site - stick your neck out and it's inevitable that not everyone is going to like every album - even those which end up as 'classics'
  19. I think you're downplaying it if anything!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.