Jump to content

joseph

Members
  • Posts

    1,516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by joseph

  1. sean, pls: hook max up to this: https://www.mandelbulb.com/
  2. Sean linked it in the chat, pretty sure it's him?
  3. Emerging from the void ? really nice
  4. Yeah really wasn't feeling the chat for a while on Friday. Got better after I blocked a couple of people lol.
  5. What's at @ 2h51m ? MC Lyte - Paper Thin mashed with something else?
  6. dj stingray - solitude serotonin
  7. This works for me, didn't have to sign up: https://mixlr.com/autechre/
  8. Too bad; I've been debating whether to read the books. Do they improve again after book 4?
  9. I'm astonished by how terrible season 4 of the expanse is. The first three had been stellar.
  10. What's the track right after It's Grim up North?
  11. lol, this thread crashed my browser. love break of dawn.
  12. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST_pgFrOj8c
  13. Lol what is this post? "Must keep up with Joneses and maintain an air of imminent unpretentiousness, approachability and likeability. Todo: #1.) Stop listening to Actress" Right except not such a conscious decision. My comment was mainly a response to Amen Lare's posts above. It's like with the Giegling dude's sexist comments from a while back. I bet many people who liked his music and/or DJing before will now be reluctant to publicly say that they like it.
  14. If people perceive Actress as pretentious, then by liking his music you too may be perceived as pretentious.
  15. GAS - Pop. Preferably not via youtube.
  16. FLeure as a whole starts out sounding like stock AE (morphing crunchy beats, weird bleepy melody and noises, etc.) Fleure as a whole starts out sounding like stock music (sounds, rhythms, etc.) (My point is that your parenthetical description doesn't explain to me what you mean by "stock AE", which I don't understand. Maybe you can pick another track from this "stock" and outline the similarities in more detail?)
  17. joseph

    AE_LIVE

    Here's an interview from that Finland show that I haven't seen posted here before (starts at 18:20) https://youtu.be/cPwsBYYVQtI?t=18m20s
  18. I did 4-AcO-DMT a couple times, but found the body load to be too ridiculous.
  19. Isn't it true that if there is a taste it's probably not pure or something else? I think I remember hearing this somewhere. In my experience that's true, but in Tikhal (I don't remember the chapter and verse), Shulgin wrote that there's sometimes a weak flavor of some sort. I'd guess that the percentage of "stuff sold as acid" on the street (offline) that's actually "pure LSD" is closer to 10% than to 50% or more. Some of the substitutes - like 25i-NBOMe - have a terrible track record for causing psychological and even physical harm, so it's stupid not to test (with reagent kits) a drug that you take. Where and how did you get the 10% figure? Even the DEA disagrees with you on that and they are WAAAAY behind the times. Most online black-market sales of LSD come from the same sources as any LSD one would buy in real life... hate to break it to you, but grams costing $18k+ on the net indicate that they are not producing their own supplies as that is a decent bit higher than wholesale direct from distribution. There was a fad years ago with dudes I knew of doing ethanol washes on laying old pans and vials and evaporating the solvent off to make pretty purple crystals of unknown purity and then laying them to blotter... But that isn't very common as you'd have to have broken down or laid a gram to get the left-over needed to even make recrystallization worth it. I will say from experience that no LSD sold by a major distributor in the USA would be below 70% pure unless they did absolutely no column work after coupling their amine to lysergic acid or the product was not stored correctly. In fact, most modern synthesis routes of LSD produce very pure and mostly stereospecific end product without column work thanks to some lush advances in organic chemistry since the days of Hoffman using fucking hydrazine back in the day. It takes tens of thousands of dollars to have the equipment and precursors to even perform the synthesis, not to mention a competent chemist to perform the work... so putting out a 10% pure product would have wholesale distributors pissed as they'd be laying 10% active product and 90% lysergic byproduct with little to no effects until larger doses are taken, then the effects manifest in the form of bad body kinks and purging before peaking. I think you misunderstood what I meant, which is mostly my fault. I wasn't making a claim about the "purity of LSD coming from a major LSD distributor". I was making an estimate of how frequent it is that something sold as LSD to an end-user does not contain another psychedelic drug (NBOMe, say). (So I don't distinguish between 50%, 75%, etc. purity as long as what it was cut with is not some other drug like NBOMe.) My guess is that this frequency is ~10% (I'm not really distinguishing between 10% and 20%, they're too close, but I'm distinguishing between ~1% and ~10%, and between ~10% and ~50%). The guess is based off of reading lots of internet forums in the past, so it's not a very confident one.
  20. If the reality checking causes frustration, I'd actually recommend forgetting about it temporarily. At the start of the process, the importance of the "reality-check" aspect of lucid dreaming is much less than the importance of faithfully keeping a dream journal (writing down everything you can remember about your dreams immediately after waking up). Keeping the journal rapidly causes my dreams to get progressively more and more vivid, night by night, and improves my recall of them (starting from a state of very poor recall and vividity). If your dreams aren't already extremely vivid, then even if you successfully perform a reality check in the dream, your level of lucidity will be low, and you won't be able to exert much control over the dream. On the other hand, a highly vivid dream is rewarding in its own right, and will provide strong motivation to sharpen your reality check skills.
  21. Isn't it true that if there is a taste it's probably not pure or something else? I think I remember hearing this somewhere. In my experience that's true, but in Tikhal (I don't remember the chapter and verse), Shulgin wrote that there's sometimes a weak flavor of some sort. I'd guess that the percentage of "stuff sold as acid" on the street (offline) that's actually "pure LSD" is closer to 10% than to 50% or more. Some of the substitutes - like 25i-NBOMe - have a terrible track record for causing psychological and even physical harm, so it's stupid not to test (with reagent kits) a drug that you take. I don't know what "the Logos" is, but it's certainly true that higher doses can lead to qualitatively different results, which are incomparable in many ways with low-dose experiences. Try lucid dreaming too. I've had lucid dreams that were better than many of my psychedelic drug induced experiences.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.