Autechre Autechre-Quaristice

[Guest Drahken]

Listened to this on my friends ER 6i earbuds....PHENOMENAL. Definitely a lot of depth I couldn't hear hear on a normal pair of headphones. Liking this more and more as I listen to it.

[Guest Enter a new display name]

I think listening to Quaristice with my computer speakers is a better experience than with headphones. I even like "The Plc" this way!

[Guest emuscles]

this album is horrible. what are they trying to do?

 

i know for a fucking fact, that if they had released this under an unknown name, it would never recieve any of the praise that's being forced here.

 

the mentality of both electronic music artists and it's cult followers can be infuriating.

Edited January 31, 2008 by emuscles

[encey]

it's

[Guest KY]

i know for a fucking fact, that if they had released this under an unknown name, it would never recieve any of the praise that's being forced here.

because everybody would say they are ripping off AE.

[brian trageskin]

this album is horrible. what are they trying to do?

 

i know for a fucking fact, that if they had released this under an unknown name, it would never recieve any of the praise that's being forced here.

 

the mentality of both electronic music artists and it's cult followers can be infuriating.

 

i disagree

[blos]

Love how "Theswere" uses the chewed-sounding rhythm sounds from tracks on the Coachella 99 set! Man there's a lot going on in these tracks, wish they were longer.

[YEK]

The bonus cd will have 11 extra tracks, and it's 68 minutes long. That means the tracks will average over 6:00 each. Do you think these tracks will evolve and develop like the untilted tracks?

 

i wouldn't be surprised if the bonus cd will be the same tracks , even in the same order but recorded as played live and jammed. meaning there will be more of that mix feeling where one track seemlessly mixes into others. expect different lengths of the tracks though obviously

[amnesia]

you could be right about the Scotland show that is 68 mins..I hope its not as I already have it, but it should sound much better than my 128bit version

[Blir]

I like the album. But I'd be lying if I said I didn't feel let down a bit. There are spots of genius (Altibzz, Simmm, Paralel Suns, Rale, Fol3, Tankakern, last two tracks) but otherwise the other tracks are okay. I dunno, I hope it grows on me more. Doesn't touch Untilted, Confield, Draft EP7, LP5 or Chiastic though.

 

Also, I'm one of the few I think who wished the Untilted tour bits stayed away from the album.

Edited January 31, 2008 by Obelisong

[brian trageskin]

quaristice is so damn futuristic

 

[awepittance]

I'm one of the few I think who wished the Untilted tour bits stayed away from the album.

 

i agree with this, i think if they were going to release it they should have just released it as a live show. they claiom doing that would be 'milking it' but i personally think thats ludicrious and what they've done onthe album by putting 2 bits of live shows imo is a muich better example of milking it. I like what they did with them, i just dont like them taken out of the context of the live set as much (sean booth himself said the reason they DONT release live shows is because he doesnt like them taken out of context, however it seems hes doing somehting to even take them out of context more than that would have done)

[awepittance]

Anyone considered the thought the bonus disc might BE the glasgow 2005 gig?

that's a good point

 

that's exactly 68:00 as i remember, and when i cut it up into distinct sections it was 11 tracks (burnt it for a friend)... i think you might be on to something.

 

i thought the exact same thing when i was first told of the 2nd disc, BUT in a recent interview i saw of sean he says he would never release the live show cause he thinks its 'milking it'

 

like i said on myh previous post, by putting 2 tracks from the set on the album i think he already did milk it@ but yeah i hope its not the soundboard recording and/or alive jam using lots of those songs as templates

[amnesia]

in a recent interview i saw of sean he says he would never release the live show cause he thinks its 'milking it'

 

but its a free CD so it could well be not milking it as we aint paying for it.

 

Only track i think didnt need to be there is the one that is like scraping waves with a loop in parts, didnt see the point to it , pure filler..

 

I wonder what the bonus Japan tracks are?

[awepittance]

in a recent interview i saw of sean he says he would never release the live show cause he thinks its 'milking it'

 

but its a free CD so it could well be not milking it as we aint paying for it.

 

Only track i think didnt need to be there is the one that is like scraping waves with a loop in parts, didnt see the point to it , pure filler..

 

I wonder what the bonus Japan tracks are?

hmm im HOPING that sean realizes that the only reason people are buying the special edition , and paying $60 is for the extra CD. so if hes going to stick by his own standards they should not make the 2nd disc the fucking live set,that would just be a joke. paying $60 for something that was free to begin with.

[Blir]

in a recent interview i saw of sean he says he would never release the live show cause he thinks its 'milking it'

 

but its a free CD so it could well be not milking it as we aint paying for it.

 

Only track i think didnt need to be there is the one that is like scraping waves with a loop in parts, didnt see the point to it , pure filler..

 

I wonder what the bonus Japan tracks are?

hmm im HOPING that sean realizes that the only reason people are buying the special edition , and paying $60 is for the extra CD. so if hes going to stick by his own standards they should not make the 2nd disc the fucking live set,that would just be a joke. paying $60 for something that was free to begin with.

 

Sean just read that and now he's frantically scrambling to put some material together for the bonus disc.

[awepittance]

in a recent interview i saw of sean he says he would never release the live show cause he thinks its 'milking it'

 

but its a free CD so it could well be not milking it as we aint paying for it.

 

Only track i think didnt need to be there is the one that is like scraping waves with a loop in parts, didnt see the point to it , pure filler..

 

I wonder what the bonus Japan tracks are?

hmm im HOPING that sean realizes that the only reason people are buying the special edition , and paying $60 is for the extra CD. so if hes going to stick by his own standards they should not make the 2nd disc the fucking live set,that would just be a joke. paying $60 for something that was free to begin with.

 

Sean just read that and now he's frantically scrambling to put some material together for the bonus disc.

 

lol, i was just thinking that after what Ism said

 

ok message to sean:

 

i know releasing the live show on disc would be 'milking it' so please just dont include any more tracks from your 2005 sets on it. everybody whos a hardcore fan (the same people who are probably buying the limited edtion) already have heard several variations of those songs already, soundboard recordings. given the fact that many of your fans have already become used to the concert variations of the songs, i propose that is a bad idea to release any more of them. unless you just want to digitally distribute the original glasgow set for free through Bleep.com, thats a great idea

[Blir]

in a recent interview i saw of sean he says he would never release the live show cause he thinks its 'milking it'

 

but its a free CD so it could well be not milking it as we aint paying for it.

 

Only track i think didnt need to be there is the one that is like scraping waves with a loop in parts, didnt see the point to it , pure filler..

 

I wonder what the bonus Japan tracks are?

hmm im HOPING that sean realizes that the only reason people are buying the special edition , and paying $60 is for the extra CD. so if hes going to stick by his own standards they should not make the 2nd disc the fucking live set,that would just be a joke. paying $60 for something that was free to begin with.

 

Sean just read that and now he's frantically scrambling to put some material together for the bonus disc.

 

lol, i was just thinking that after what Ism said

 

ok message to sean:

 

i know releasing the live show on disc would be 'milking it' so please just dont include any more tracks from your 2005 sets on it. everybody whos a hardcore fan (the same people who are probably buying the limited edtion) already have heard several variations of those songs already, soundboard recordings. given the fact that many of your fans have already become used to the concert variations of the songs, i propose that is a bad idea to release any more of them. unless you just want to digitally distribute the original glasgow set for free through Bleep.com, thats a great idea

 

PS. We love you :-)

[Guest Rogueofmv]

I think I'll just wait for the CD. It's not worth buying if you already have the damn music, IMO.

[kaini]

So, how’s it going?

 

Yeah fine, it’s all been pretty relaxed. We didn’t even look at the schedule, it’s just not been hectic.

 

 

Was there a time when doing press was particularly stressful?

 

Rob: Oh yeah, definitely. The worst was the first time we toured the US. We did a lot of interviews and it was awful, the people interviewing us didn’t even know what house music was, didn’t understand…

 

 

That’s still the case with a lot of the music press. You have to ask, is it that readers don't want to read about that kind of music, or that journalists don't want to write about it? You feel like It’s not a lack of willingness or curiosity, necessarily..

 

Sean: But then you say, who are your heroes? Surely you really like Joy Division and New Order and I was like, you’ve heard these bands but you don’t know the stuff that they were listening to…

 

 

The thing is, a lot of people my age, myself included, spent the 1990s equating techno to 2Unlimited, there was no point of reference really, I wasn’t old enough to go to clubs or take drugs or whathaveyou, so all I the only association I had for techno was cheese.

 

Sean: I used to go out with this girl I knew who worked in a nursery – this was around '94 or '95 – and she was saying that in another ten or fifteen years dance music’s going to go really, really stupid, because she’d go into her school maybe a bit wasted from the weekend and all the kids in her school would be like ‘Have you been out ‘RAAVING, you been out RAVING?’ like that [mimes overexcited children]...

 

 

That’s it. When you’re a kid, you don’t know what drugs are, you don’t really know what clubs are, you have no reference or setting to locate dance music in, so it seem pretty cartoonish. Add to that the fact that people like 2Unlimited were going out of their way to make cartoonish music, and well, there you go. When I was entering my teens, everyone was obsessed by Chemical Brothers and The Prodigy – stuff like that which had come from the underground and was making a real dent in the pop world, but was still very cartoonish.

 

Rob: That was all like the third wave to us.

 

 

So what was the first wave?

 

Rob: Depends if you count your parents and what they played…

 

Sean: For me personally it was hip-hop. I saw punk from a distance and thought, it’s cool, I thought punks looked cool, but I was just like 11 at the time. It weren’t until I heard electro and saw people breakdancing and scratching that I really got into music. That was a massive turning-point. I think the fact that it was in the street, that they were kids that I knew, they were pulling these amazingly fly moves, I mean, they were ridiculously good dancers, and, the music sounded like it was from the future. I think all that together…I mean, it was pretty ubiquitous at the time, this was 83 or ‘4…

 

 

And this was in Manchester and surrounding area?

 

Rob: Regional Manchester, yeah…

 

Sean: The first time I ever saw breaking was when three or four kids turned up to school with a ghetto-blaster and started pulling loads of moves, and I just thought “WHAT IS THAT?” , it looks totally futuristic and there’s a crowd around them and everyone was really into it, and I really didn’t know what it was…So I got a kid I knew called Scott to make me a tape, this brilliant tape – it had, like, half of [street Sounds] Electro 5, a bunch of other tracks, ‘Step Off’ by Grandmaster Flash, erm, Techno-Scratch, people like that…

 

It was ubiquitous though, all the kids at school were doing it, at lunchtime and breaktimes in the playground…

 

 

 

So it wasn’t an outsider thing as such?

 

Sean: No, not really.

 

Rob: I was about a year and a half older than Sean, I mean, I am about a year and a half older than Sean, and my ears perked up when I listened to electronic music generally – it might’ve been, you know, Tears For Fears, or it might’ve been Kraftwerk…

 

 

Music with a big synthetic element?

 

Rob: Yeah, it had to be synthetic. We'd have the school disco every Friday, and it’d be the usual cheese tunes and then they might play something like Kraftwerk, ‘The Model’, and we’d be doing these rudimentary breakdance moves that we’d seen on say, Malcolm McClaren’s videos – that was the leading edge to it, really. And then soon it was ‘Breakdance Electro Boogie’ [by West Street Mob / Junior Cartier] and ‘Mosquito’ [by West Street Mob], and the things that came out on Sugarhill, suddenly it all just became widespread in Manchester and Rochdale and everyone in my little sphere at school were just into tracks and would make cassette mixes and copy each other’s tracks, and then pirate radio came along – to us, anyway, obviously it had been around in some form or other since, whatever, the 60s – suddenly they were playing music we liked and suddenly they were playing records from America. That’s obviously where it [the music] all was coming from, and we thought, “We’ve got a direct line now to this stuff”…

 

 

Were there any particular pirate stations that you listened to?

 

Rob: Yeah absolutely, Southside Radio. We were North West of Manchester and a lot of people in Manchester and Merseyside were probably getting much better broadcast quality than we were, so it would have to be people who were maybe a little older, had jobs, maybe travelled to Liverpool and recorded it. So all the older blokes used to get them and we’d just copy them and copy them. I never bought any until I was about 13 or 14.

 

Sean: Mike Shaft was good too…

 

Rob: Yeah…

 

Sean: On mainstream radio we had, like, Greg Wilson, Mike Shaft, what’s his name, Lee Brown? Sam Brown…

 

Rob: Sam Brown was pirate though…

 

Sean: …and Stu Allen...and all those guys were playing this stuff. We had a shop in Manchester called the Spin Inn, which is now a drum ‘n bass shop, but back in the day it was the only import shop in Manchester. I used to go in there when I was, like, twelve, and I’d be surrounded by these massive blokes -

 

Rob: - big black Manchester dudes!

 

Sean: It was the first time I’d ever been in a shop like that…a really, really small shop with loads of records and loads of people. Putting on tunes really loud for two minutes at a time, people would buy whatever was playing on their soundsystem ‘cos the sound was so good! Yeah, every record they put on you’d buy, 'cos they had Technics and the sound was amazing…

 

Rob: Yeah, you’d just go in and buy everything you could – I mean, there wasn’t much of it around…

 

 

Was there much quality control in terms of what they sold?

 

Rob: Yeah, what you were getting was high quality…

 

Sean: It was a specialist shop..

 

Rob: They were making an effort to get good stuff…

 

Sean: Yeah, it was a specialist shop – they were importing all kinds of music. Bit of rare groove and breaks…

 

Rob: ..to the latest Schoolly D or…

 

Sean: The buyer at Spin Inn at the time was a guy called Kenny Brogan, there was another guy there called Ross and they both really knew their sh!t. But they were still at the whim of the distributor, they’d still have to get their shipment once a month from the distributors – and then that Sunday on the Stu Allen show or Lee Brown show you’d hear a bunch of the tunes, so on the Monday you’d go into town and you’d get ‘em. So, it wasn’t like there was a massive review policy going on, it was just a case of, we put the tunes on and bang them out…

 

I’m guessing that along with the radio, the record store was the only place you were hearing stuff like this. Was there anywhere you could read about electro or the music you liked?

 

Sean: No, though there was one magazine called Streetscene, which was one of a kind. When I was in college Melody Maker would come out once in a while with something, NME might too. There was another one that was smaller…

 

Rob: Record Mirror?

 

Sean: Yeah…That used to be really good. And Lime Lizard as well, before that went off…These were mags I’d buy because they’d have, like, Mantronik on the cover…

 

Rob: It would just be one small feature, never anything big. I was getting off it radio, really…

 

Sean: I mean, by sort of ’86-’87, I was still wearing tracksuit bottoms – and I was massively unfashionable, it wasn’t cool anymore, everybody else had got into James or whathaveyou…Yeah, even in ’86 I was getting dissed…

 

Rob: You know, as soon as something’s become saturated, you have to move on. But if you’re affected by that something, saturation or not, you’re just moulded for life. All your criteria, all the moves you make…

 

Sean: I used to think [of other people], “How can you not be into it anymore?” I was competitive about it, you know? I was like, it’s so futuristic-sounding, what does fashion have to do with it?

 

 

 

I guess that “futuristic” element was particularly appealing to you as youngsters…

 

Rob: Yeah, but then if you only preach futurism, you can only let go of the past. The further we got from ’83 and ’84, where the intersection for me and Sean was, it was all becoming more retro…

 

Sean: I know it doesn’t sound like a long time, but to us at the time it was an eternity. By ’87, it started to go mainstream, because of Public Enemy, LL Cool J, and the sampler really took over – everyone was suddenly very aware of the sampling. But those three years, 85-87, to me personally were the most productive years of hip-hop...That’s when all the amazing production happened -

 

Rob: - it’s when everything was laid out.

 

Sean: And that was the time when I used to cut the most flak for being into it! So for that brief period, it was an outsider thing. And yeah, by about ’87 it started to become cool again, but I was massively into house by then…

 

Rob: Yeah, but that was when the music had been watered-down when it came back again, you’d get people like Lakim Shabazz , and then ‘The Power’ by Snap would come out, and it was basically the same record, and you’d be like, “That came out too years ago! No!”

 

 

When house arrived, did you see it as a natural extension or continuation of your love of hip-hop, or was it something altogether different? Was it disseminated through an entirely different network, or did those same channels that brought you the hip-hop begin to deliver house too?

 

Rob: At this point, Sean and I were poles apart. I used to listen to the same radio station – it started with soul in the early evening, would go into hip-hop, and then – they used to move the schedule around over the different years, obviously - but at one point it became soul, hip-hop, then acid, then house, though house was obviously first because it was more soul-ly. And the more hard it got, to acid, I think Sean was getting more into it…

 

Sean: I didn’t like house. When I first heard it, I thought – this is a joke. I mean, I’d like Larry Heard but I’d not heard any; when I first heard house I was hearing, like, Farley records, but not the acid ones – the soully bassline ones with all the singing over the top…

 

Rob: That’s down to the DJ, innit…

 

Sean: …and I just didn’t really like anything like that. I didn’t like the singing, I didn’t like the 4x4 beat…

 

 

I think that’s a transition lots of people fail to make – that of breakbeat to 4x4…

 

Sean:I really didn’t like house or 4x4 until I heard acid. It was Armando that did it…

 

Rob: Yeah, I mean, if it was a basic 4x4 track it would probably get rejected by us, but if it was an acid track…

 

 

There’s a real skippy element to those Armando tunes that made them stand out rhythmically from the rest…

 

Sean: A certain Latin element, yeah. Armando was what I was into: still 4x4, but a bit slower than the rest, and the acid lines were properly funky – you know, they had really good funk on ‘em – and it sounded really weird. They were all on off-beats and I really liked that, ‘cos it was a lot less [impersonates tinny, pedestrian bass and hi-hat house beat]

 

Rob: Yeah, with most house our immediate reaction was to think how lazy it was to put the same beat on every record…

 

Sean: For us, house was sh!t songs made and played by people who couldn’t do good beats, you know, just rubbish…until I heard acid and then I suddenly went, “Oh no! It’s the same but it’s changing!” and I had this weird epiphany where I’m thinking, “OK, it’s the same loop, but they keep changing everything” and I really like that, I really liked the feeling that the track was going somewhere…

 

Rob: And it’s tuning was different, ‘cos resonance on an acid synth – I’d never heard of such a thing. I’d be, like, “What? It’s going up in tune but it’s going down at the same time?!?”

 

Sean: Acid’s what got me into Tangerine Dream and all that stuff. I heard those synths and I’d be like, “This is like acid but without the beats.” It was a really big thing. I mean, obviously I was massively into electronic music because that’s what hip-hop came from, but still…

 

 

Were you living at home at this point?

 

Sean: Yeah, I met Rob in ’87, and moved out of my parents’ about ’91.

 

 

At what point did you actually start making tunes?

 

Rob: ’88.

 

Sean: I used to do pause button [i.e. cassette] mixes and Rob used to do mixes on decks. So when we got together we’d be, right, let’s do the mixes on decks, and then we’ll do re-edits…

 

Rob: ..and we used all our records, so we had all our tastes on there…

 

Sean: We had so many overlaps, didn’t we? The tunes I bought, it would turn out Rob had bought too, so there was that connection thing going on…A lot of the tunes were outsider tunes, like Meat Beat Manifesto or Renegade Soundwave, Keith LeBlanc, Art of Noise, that sort of thing…These were really good tracks, they don’t tow the line, and I think that was the big thing for us, realizing it’s the weirder tracks that we were most into. By ’88 we had a drum machine and a sampler, and we were sort of doing more work with our mixes.

 

Rob: Yeah, we’d sort of hype up other people’s samples, but then maybe somehow get rid of other people’s samples, and put our own beats over other people’s tracks in the mix…

 

Sean: It got to a point where culture had caught up, where sampling was sort of alright, and it was alright to consider yourself a musician and not just someone who ripped off other people’s tracks.

 

Rob: Yeah, there was a creativity in the mix. If you listened to radio stations, like Stu Allen’s night or Mike Shaft, at the end of the year they’d have a ‘best of’ mix, and it’d be like the DMC regional best guy and he’d do a mix that was often quite cheesy overall, but there’d be certain parts where there was elaborate creativity going on to get one track into another, and those moments were like what Mantronix were basing their entire career out of and we were just like, “Yeah, I want to do that kind of nuts and bolts thing, that tick-tack of a track you know but it’s new, and as soon as we got a drum machine and a sampler, we were doing that.

 

But you know, it’s funny, those moments in a remix or megamix, suddenly became especially celebrated in the late 80s, you know, there’d be the chart version and then there’d be an Orb remix or something and suddenly it was cool to be into remixes…But back when we were listening to stuff, when we couldn’t get our hands on any of the equipment, to me it was blinding to hear Mantronix do a track and then next week you’d hear the remix and Mantronix chop up…and it’s like, “how can he have finished the mix if he was chopping?” It was the fact that he could re-approach it, and the fact that the re-approach was actually the starting block, that excited me. Because suddenly things could be jerky from the outset…

 

Sean: You know, and then reading ‘Omar Santana edit’ on the back, you know, hearing an edit of Mantronix that was easily the best one, and it said, ‘Omar Santana edit’ and I’d think, “Who’s Omar Santana? I wanna be that guy, he’s doing all the best versions…”

 

Rob: And at the same time, Latin Rascals would be making big mixes on WBLS and that in America…

 

 

So this stuff is where you’re still present love of, well, chopping things up came from?

 

Sean: Oh, totally. Direct.

 

Rob: It's where it all came from for us. Mechanical futurism...with an expressive soul at its heart.

 

 

This is part one of a two-part interview with Autechre

[lumpenprol]

Excellent interview, they always come across as likeable chaps. Wish I liked Quaristice more though...

[kaini]

can't wait for part two, where they allegedly talk about hotdogging, upperdecking, and deep sea creatures/

[awepittance]

in a recent interview i saw of sean he says he would never release the live show cause he thinks its 'milking it'

 

but its a free CD so it could well be not milking it as we aint paying for it.

 

Only track i think didnt need to be there is the one that is like scraping waves with a loop in parts, didnt see the point to it , pure filler..

 

I wonder what the bonus Japan tracks are?

hmm im HOPING that sean realizes that the only reason people are buying the special edition , and paying $60 is for the extra CD. so if hes going to stick by his own standards they should not make the 2nd disc the fucking live set,that would just be a joke. paying $60 for something that was free to begin with.

 

Sean just read that and now he's frantically scrambling to put some material together for the bonus disc.

 

lol, i was just thinking that after what Ism said

 

ok message to sean:

 

i know releasing the live show on disc would be 'milking it' so please just dont include any more tracks from your 2005 sets on it. everybody whos a hardcore fan (the same people who are probably buying the limited edtion) already have heard several variations of those songs already, soundboard recordings. given the fact that many of your fans have already become used to the concert variations of the songs, i propose that is a bad idea to release any more of them. unless you just want to digitally distribute the original glasgow set for free through Bleep.com, thats a great idea

 

PS. We love you :-)

 

 

and let me alter what i said a little bit, Chenc9 is fantastic. If all the live set tracks were retooled to that extent and given new homes inside new tracks that would be awesome. Im mainly talking about track 3 (IO?)

[khov]

releasing the glasgow set is a wicked idea, i've been listening to it for 2 years & this recording deserve maximum audio quality (CD 2 make it short). but selling it as a 2CD set for 60$ would be insane. i mean, "do you know squarepusher" has a bonus cd too & "hello everything" has some bonus trax (ep + mini cd) & they were sold at totally decent prices.

 

& from what i've understood selling special edition with complex artwork / heavy shipping doesnt imply making more money. like i trust aphex when he said rephlex made less money with the binder than with other regular ep..

 

well no one knows what's on this bonus cd & still didnt hear this quaristice record yet!!

[Velazquez]

This shit is banging son !