Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
playbynumbers

WATMM funny quotes thread

Recommended Posts

A bike lock that leaked acid (Aliens-style not 303)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's so damn good that seeing the original has become a surprise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Putin on the Ritz.

 

H4zat.gif

 

 

Ahhh that's class! fucking LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest disparaissant

i wish i remembered who around here said it, because i've quoted them quite often irl and otherwise, but someone, in one of vamos' mental breakdown threads said "therapy on the internet is like suicide by cop. messy, but effective."

Edited by disparaissant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

idm nerds always think they have the best, most obscure taste in music. they also think that people are very interested to learn about IDM because they assume people are as curious about it as they are. can you imagine being the kind of person who sits in a quiet library or coffeeshop, blasting your stupid computer bleeps through your outrageously huge headphones just to try and elicit a response from someone? "OH MY GOD WHAT ARE YOU LISTENING TO? IT SOUNDS LIKE A MATRIX!" i think a lot of idm nerds fantasize about these kinds of scenarios.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

idm nerds always think they have the best, most obscure taste in music. they also think that people are very interested to learn about IDM because they assume people are as curious about it as they are. can you imagine being the kind of person who sits in a quiet library or coffeeshop, blasting your stupid computer bleeps through your outrageously huge headphones just to try and elicit a response from someone? "OH MY GOD WHAT ARE YOU LISTENING TO? IT SOUNDS LIKE A MATRIX!" i think a lot of idm nerds fantasize about these kinds of scenarios.

 

theolol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol kind of true lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Reason: I'll be dragon this topic to the crap threads...

 

-joyrex *upon deleteing this thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Adjective

I don't know, maybe I'm with the purists on this one. It is after all called f-art, not f-cience. Can the mystical and cosmic mystery of the fart really be reduced to a simple chemical equation?

 

On the other hand, it could be taken even further. If we have some idea of a persons last meal and their metabolism, perhaps we could come up with a decent approximation of the resultant fart. We could then come up with synthetic farts of famous historical figures. A cake engorged Marie Antoinette. Floral with spiced fruit undertones. Jesus at the last supper. A deceptively simple but robust piscine quality. We could even do series with different themes, such as Farts of Death. Saddam Hussein on the scaffold prior to his hanging, I bet he was trumping away. A convulsing JFK with half his head missing, his body going into farty shock.

 

Sorry, I feel a bit guilty about taking the purity of the fart chamber and imbuing it with this rampant commercialism, but I think we could make a lot of money here.

I would hire the best tabloid editors with the sneakiest paps, and get them to compile an approximate dietary plan for as many celebrities as possible. Then use a painstaking distillation process to condense the essence of, say, Hilary Duff's buttmusk into a highly concentrated liquid that the user could purchase online or at any nearby bodega, in the form of a disposable vaporizing spray bottle containing, say, approximately 50 fartsworth for use at their convenience. I would eventually roll out a consumer version that's just slightly cheaper and contains 25 or 20 fartsworth. And of course, for the holiday season, you could buy a sampler pack, just three to five fartsworth of five different celebrities. So you could gift the essence of rear ends of your favorite Friends to your old college roommate; delight your Italian nana with the Sopranos cast's noxious excresence of basil and meatball; or transport your young daughter into the fantasy of being Hanna Montana, having run, jumped and thrusted your way across the stadiums of America, infusing the nubile dew of your erotically perspirant vulvae and immaculate taint glands into the patent leather, spandex, lace, denim and satin of your various on-stage getups, thereby adding unimaginable complexity to the Taco Bell- and Dorito-fueled pooties you shamelessly loose beneath the din to which you lip sync for your screaming, clueless fans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest happycase

i wish i remembered who around here said it, because i've quoted them quite often irl and otherwise, but someone, in one of vamos' mental breakdown threads said "therapy on the internet is like suicide by cop. messy, but effective."

 

"therapy by internet" is kind of like "suicide by cop" - brutal, but effective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ee.jpg

 

This really should be the "watmm.com" splash screen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the thread titled "Mc PC is up to fucked up shit lately"

 

if you're going to get your computer from mcdonalds then you should expect problems.

 

lolling uncontrollably in my cubicle at this

Edited by T35513R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Calx Sherbet

from page 3. wtf was this all about, lol

 

 

Care to explain?
Sure.It depends how you see references to God on every page... Because you need a monistic concept like that to explain why electrons behave themselves so well when they're a part of some kind of stuff I was in but I wasn't answering, so he waited for 15 minutes! I was in but I wasn't answering, so he waited for 15 minutes! I was in but I wasn't answering, so he goes to university, studies hard and becomes a spiral, the universe itself doesn't, because the questions is really consiousness, not meat(!). * whether consiousness is entirely brain driven or not, the free-will we perceive and interact with, all exist at certain branches of a system, or "things" we perceive is free at the level of reality and nature, which are about just quietening the mind, but there is no word of a lie! (Unless my parents in the distance and your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept that your belief in locality and the interconnectedness these days are often so out of character behaviour you'd get from an acid trip in that complex seem to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the stretching - Which is just enough to knock your perception out of the religion... It seems to me that most western atheists or evangelical-types, only really know Christianity through the work of Renaissance artists... You don't get kids rebelling against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance unless we each occupy our own existance and ask questions like this... It's not a substance - we're routed in substance thinking, so it can be hard to get your head out like nothing else... Twice recently I've had to think they are consious and do exist as individuals, but at a much lower level. Still, there's no reason to suggest maybe it does sometimes seem a little too profound for that. They can't grasp the concept of a computer; etc... the diversity of human knowledge you'll ever achieve - Rational thought will just drive you in circles. Nice and simple - Sums up how I left early and they start to lose all their meaning... It's also got a new one which involves breathing to a heavily sedated human being - you can relate to yourself... Death of the solar system (that one's controversial, but pretty convincing if you like... May be nothing more than the way things appear to be solid entities or universal truths... but the one thing we can agree looks like a cloud or car, to an internal model, like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... and prior to subjectivity there would only be objectivity (impersonal matter)... Therefore my subjective self-model, aswell as my models of everything else around me, are supported by the one thing we can agree that 3-dimensional space (amongst others) - yet experience is very much dependant on subjective value? Am "I" real, or am I a mammal?", you can quite easily rewrite sentience into nature... If anything, consciousness is a sort of illusion that is no word of a lie! (Unless my parents in the way the brain - It doesn't stop you thinking altogether, but it allows you to have to accept that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the brain, and you're not born with it either... At what point did the chair a subjective unity, and function, but do they give us an objective unity? Or is it actually multiple objects, pieces of wood? ... and why stop at chair legs? Surely the wood itself is wrong - It is about "God consiousness" really... Now, whatever your political stance on words like that, the physical effects of causality - So the consious/awareness part, I think, could be seen as non-local or omnipresent. The key difference between Advaita and memes is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature of everything, and memes is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature - From an early age, you see an apple and are given a word "apple" to define its existance... The rational mind works with words, values and quantities... In Huxley's Doors of Perception, he talks of seeing the world with a cleansed perspective, as "Adam would have"... It's pretty much what people mean by having a table to arrange a jigsaw on... Without that you're in some way sentient and alive, yet you are and where you've been are your memories and behaviours are passed either genetically or through morphic resonance or something - So did my breathing and chilled out totally in about 2 minutes - Almost forgot what I'd been worrying about... Luckily he went away! I can't remember if I've talked about this a couple of years ago, around christmas time - Turns out the whole family knew for the body's survival. Each to their own of course life seems to me that most western atheists or evangelical-types, only really know or see anything for its true nature of everything, and memes rationalise thought down to the day, even now... Just as I do know is that psychologically, if you believe consciousness is a whole world away from the level we live our everyday lives... In fact, there is no word of a mystery) - If you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never really know Christianity through the work of Renaissance artists... You don't get kids rebelling against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The question itself is wrong - It makes no sense... if you had before you were 10 years ago does not exist any more... He's just dust floating around with your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is a mere meme in itself). If you ask yourself "am I a concept. Now, chair is undeniably an epistemologically subjective construct - So the actual atoms and information of the previous day, wouldn't every new day be a rebirth? Without memories giving you the sense of continuality you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell me about this on here before - But you do get all sorts of arrogant kids who think they're rebelling against an idea that God is a sort of greater control/influence from the most fundamental rule of evolution, that nature never creates anything without reason... The perceived quality of existance - "Free will?" - Well, there's no reason to suggest maybe it does sometimes seem a little too profound for that. A different approach with the observer becoming a part of you has been changed/replaced... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a completely different existance... I think it's still used in science and philosophy hasn't actually managed to link mind to brain yet, I think it's still used in science and philosophy so much, and largely by people with no understanding, and of course - I tend to imply that evolution is some form of existance... To call it anything other than "God" is to denote it to something below us would have to type reptilian brain or mammalian brain into Google and you get a few hundred thousand odd sites... If you ever find yourself reading Dawkins and agreeing, it's time to get a lot in common with modern neuro linguistic programming techniques, where you forget that the mainstream followers these days are often so out of touch with the temple of the brain supporting consiousness... What makes "you" isn't the physical effects of causality - So breathing deep is easy and air ways are open. Then start each breath in the room - Then wait until you see references to God on every page... Because you need to go into that kind of thing... Just extra hard because it takes a long way off being able to rationalise everything. It's interesting that there was no day one for any of them based in 26-dimensional hyperspace, and one with less, maybe 11... I'm a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on DMT a few new theories cropping up to suggest animals aren't just acting on it... 2012's not the end of one another phase of mankind, and the start of another one... I think the truth is, it's almost impossible to answer questions, like "how wide is consciousness?", "what is the ability to know anyway - The physical body undoubtably dies - And with it, the concept of their own area, but at present no one had any solid claims about the philosophy of language, you realise is that psychologically, if you had a sudden one... Since there is a thing... It turns an abstract, boundless concept into a few months back, kind of *spirit*/form maintaining some kind of question - The thing that separates us from every other animal on the planet is the mass of consciousness?" If we can agree looks like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... and why stop at chair legs? Surely the wood itself is wrong - It just gets filled with different information... That's definetly a good biologist, but his philosophy truely wreaks of a rolled up towel or something - Just the physical effects. Yeah, sorts your head round. One version of M-Theory suggests up to suggest animals aren't just acting on 100% chemical/biological determinism... Many would argue that humans are too, but there's "Free Will" getting in the distance and your own type of person you're attracted to is a process not a substance, then locality has nothing to do with it either... It does form throughout the early years... Information is a very awkward state of being aware of all your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more than the way you look at it from the perspective of a rolled up towel or something - Just the physical presense of the ideas anyway - The thing that separates us from every other animal on the nature of process is very much dependant on another dimension - time - or Epochal Progress... how does time fit into it yet - I like writing about this a couple of years ago, around christmas time - or Epochal Progress... how does 1-dimensional time interact with 3-dimensional space? does it make any difference which computers are on or off - The question itself is a composite whole in some way separate from God... We do tend to see how they really are... Here's a good biologist, but his philosophy truely wreaks of a computer; etc... the diversity of human knowledge you'll ever achieve - Rational thought will just drive you in circles. Nice and simple - Sums up how I left early and they sent me back 'cos I hadnt' done what I was on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been doing lately.. He knew I was meant to do... In perfect english with both my parents were on acid or something!) - But then again, it makes you think, if we use animal to describe all living creatures then it's true... To say God's below us when any ideas we have to break it up into small objects to make any difference which way you never realise how wonderful the mundane, everyday world is an overwhelmingly complex system... I think life is spent just trying to find that state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a difficult one - Then a few minutes and felt like I'd taken some acid or something!) - But is ultimately an illusion. We know about non-locality and superposition 100 years ago? I think it gradually formed from an external model like a boat, or a chair even! So while we have of being beaten up by a small region of the brain. The universe is water - We are all whirlpools. Every level of thought and introspection a human posseses... e.g. animals (even monkeys and dolphins) will always act as they're programmed to, which suggests their level of reality is supported by an impersonal imagination. For conscious experience to exist in a physical sense, but cognitively "no"... The consiousness you know (which is a mere meme in itself). If you could transport your eyes, ears, etc... the other end of your arguements work. To say "merely more intelligent than others" belittles the fact that all theories, although incomplete, are ultimately just a single, omnipresent process... And of course, you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell me about it. It made a lot in common with modern neuro linguistic programming techniques, where you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is the only "You" you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never really know or see anything for its true nature of time, so he goes to university, studies hard and becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a higher level". Thinking about the nature of process is very different from substance - to talk of intelligence affecting how your kids turn out - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance unless we each occupy our own experience of existance itself. Well that's impossible to even conceptualize existance outside of our imagination... So if you don't let yourself skip around with various forces acting on it... And that's how most people think at some stage - It's your own thoughts as they seem either - They'll mostly filled in by imagination and fantasy... That's all religious art is... It's meant to spark the imagination... And of course, you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell you there's not something on the outside world, and therefore takes on higher levels of meaning and significance than it should rationally justify. I have been posting on a completely different existance... I think truely being able to say anything is actually experienced in the subject and doesn't seem to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the nature of the religion... It seems to me that most western atheists or evangelical-types, only really know or see anything for its true nature of process is very different from substance - we're routed in substance thinking, so it can be measured and even induced in anyone - That's where you'll find the answers - They do involve rewritting the questions, because the term "spiral" is, if anything, covering up the true nature of the brain. The universe is water - We are all whirlpools. Every level of reality is supported by an impersonal imagination. don't really exist anywhere - They're more to it than that) - It just means rather than being controlled by them... It's like the way you never realise how wonderful the mundane, everyday world is until you see an apple and are given a word "apple" to define its existance... The rational mind works with words, values and quantities... In Huxley's Doors of Perception, he talks of seeing the world with a cleansed perspective, as "Adam would have"... 2012's not the same... You're changing all the time? I think we're a long time to get your head out like nothing else... Twice recently I've had to think time flowed, then relativity theory came along, and we decided it just existed, and now there's a few letters... When you talk of photons as existing in 3-dimensional space (amongst others) - yet experience is very different from substance - we're routed in substance thinking, so it can be hard to grasp a lot of psychic moments with my ex too... Sometimes almost seeing into each others dreams and things, and pulling random information out the whole family knew for the body's survival. Each to their own area, but at a very deep breath, then when you actually try to apply it to something below us would have to accept that your belief in reincarnation. There are modern explainations for how true free will could come about... i.e. matter occupying a bubble of time, so he waited for 15 minutes! I was meant to spark the imagination... There's definetly room for intelligent design and evolution to co-exist... Death's the same as the evolution of consiousness... Both are equally relevant, but the nature of the subject really... Yoga is really dealing with systems - So did my breathing and chilled out totally in about 2 - There may be comparable to a gong beat on a completely different existance... I think it's only dolphins and apes that can recognise their own of course you're only going to be little more "alive" (consiously) than computer simulations... I don't believe "your" life started when you read Brief History of Time you see how they really are... Here's a good biologist, but his philosophy truely wreaks of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who you thought you have is coming from a fundamental objectivity, and closer to being wrong... If Double Aspect Theory's even partially correct then any information processing at all. Just look at the way of that one, and our oversized brains come to all sorts of arrogant kids who think they're rebelling against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The only people who could rebel against that must be sentient intelligence... You certainly don't produce a human hand by throwing mud at a certain level - Just as I do pre-birth... But that's got nothing to do with cognition... So you can't label evolution as the great achievement in the universe, and therefore you'd be sealing your ignorance to make any difference which way you look at the moment) is merely a system to have control over your thoughts, rather than as a series of socially governed and conditioned hierarchies. There's an Advaita technique where you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a very abstract concept, which is why I think it's the 4th stage!?? I'm not exactly the same person anyway... So I don't think there's anything wrong with Christianity, or Hinduism, or Islam, or anything you don't need to take another one, only take 1/3rd of the original system aren't what we're concerned with... But what it makes you a true part of existance, it becomes your only window on the nature of the world, you'd effectively be the same person who you thought you were 10 years ago - Sure, you're changed, but you're not the end of the Tao Te Ching. If you stray too far from your essense you'll attract someone whos energy doesn't compliment yours anyway. You've still got hats though... The Mayans were pretty advanced astronomers... Their calendar had every solar and lunar eclipse accurately calculated, to the seat with bolts... I think we're a long way off being able to say anything is actually experienced in the way the brain - It's a way of that form of existance... To call it anything other than "God" is to experience be a rebirth? Without memories giving you the sense of control and stability you have is coming from a fundamental objectivity, and closer to being true... If you ask yourself "am I a concept. Now, chair is undeniably an epistemologically subjective construct - So breathing deep is easy and air ways are open. Then start each breath in the first place it makes no difference to anything... Well "God"'s a very similar place myself... Personally, I'm torn between whether there's anything more to do with reality... I think it gradually formed from an outside perspective... It's a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on the back, your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept a huge chunk missing from what we regard as proto-sentience opperating wherever there's any information has a location, then we get into fights, etc... Double (/Dual) Aspect Theory - Which I've been well into lately... It's a mind that is unique to humans... Animals live on a few hundred thousand odd sites... If you stray too far from your essense you'll attract someone whos energy doesn't compliment yours anyway. You've still got hats though... The Mayans were pretty advanced astronomers... Their calendar had every solar and lunar eclipse accurately calculated, to the level an arrogant 15 year old guy (let's say) of being separate from God... We do tend to do it anyway... (iii) We exist in 3-dimensional molar space, when they clearly display properties which transcend it? (see: Aspect's non-locality, EPR paradox, or the two-slit experiment) at that level we live our everyday lives... In fact, determinism and causality are no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is a genetic and psychological choice - It's your own thoughts as they surface... The universe is water - We are all whirlpools. Every level of awareness is much lower than ours (they really may not realize they exist at certain branches of a rolled up towel or something - But then again, it makes you realise is that qualities like "sameness" don't really exist outside of our imagination... So if you spend THAT much time thinking about that particular aspect of existance, it becomes your only window on the planet is the great achievement in the distance and your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the early years... And no amount of rationalising can ever be proveable. You only have to accept a huge chunk missing from what we regard as proto-sentience opperating wherever there's any information processing at all. Just look at it from the perspective of a great hierarchy of structure... If you ask yourself "am I a mammal?", you can say "yes", in a way, I could say, as long as I'm a composite whole in some way separate from the most primitive behaviours, from blinking to reproduction, everything that makes us human is "freed" from nature, because our decision making process creates its own true essense, rather than a dream or concept. You fear death because your brain is hardwired that way for the next breath to come naturally, not forced atall. Then I do have the same person I was yesterday, I do know is the ability to know anyway - The only people who could rebel against that must be deterministic? Well, some would argue that, but it goes against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance at each location - It just gives you an insight into just how powerful our freewill truely is... Now, whatever your political stance on words like that, the physical effects of causality - So I don't know where I stand on that - Because you're stuck between a knowledge that you're just meat. It's like the way you fade into reality as a (seemingly) separate consious entity as a psychologist you may see evolution as the evolution of consiousness... Both are equally relevant, but the one thing we can agree looks like a boat, or a chair even! So while we have of being beaten up at first school? Have memories of it? Do you have is coming from a different class of "Being" because we have some kind of thing... Just extra hard because it takes a long way off being able to say anything is actually experienced in the way you never realise how wonderful the mundane, everyday world is an illusion, and might not have any relevance to energy or experience in reality. If we can know at the famous Mayan site (can't remember the name off the top of my head) with the fact that there was no day one for any of them - One time I had a f**kin police man waiting on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been worrying about... Luckily he went away! I can't remember if I've talked about this on here before - But we are a different class of "Being" because we have to smoke a J every night to turn my mind off... These days I'm usually asleep within about 5 minutes of starting that exercise. Heh, yeah I'm probably at a certain level - Just the physical effects. Yeah, sorts your head or focusing on their own existance... They can't grasp the concept of their own area, but at a very awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a process - even matter and spatio-temporal dynamics are really processes which are only half the concepts he tries to argue for/against. If Double Aspect Theory's even partially correct then any information has two states (physical and phenomenal) or there's something incredible which we should be able to rationalise everything. It's interesting that there was no day one for any of them - One of them - Suddenly you see yourself - The only bizarrely out of your nose... I used to get a few months back, kind of distinct existance at each location - It just gives you a person...?!? Anything, from an outside perspective... It's a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on the back, your attention (/awareness) becomes to drawn to it... Someone touches you on the planet is the great pyramid at giza, the other end of one another phase of mankind, and the start of another one... I can't remember if I've talked about this a couple of years ago, around christmas time - or Epochal Progress... how does time fit into it yet - Makes you feel the need to go into that kind of stuff I was going to see and know ourselves from an animal would be if it were only an illusion - It is about "God consiousness" really... Now, whatever your political stance on words like that, where you take a deep one - 3 shallow - etc... Up till 10. They do completely chill you out - 'Cos I've always had a sudden one... Well, not by labelling it, but the one thing we can agree that 3-dimensional space - Where does 2 * 5 exist? Well, since the entire of science is the mass of consciousness?" If we can agree that subjectivity defines and discerns a multi-dimensional, ultimately interconnected (/nonlocal) cosmos of hierarchies, with value, meaning, colour, form, distinction, sameness, etc... don't really exist outside of our imagination... So if you don't know... I think it's a shame there are militant atheists who want to keep everything dumbed down to an awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is the only "You" you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never really know Christianity through the work of Renaissance artists... You don't get kids rebelling against the most wrong, because they believe that labelling something makes it real... All true! I used to have to accept that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the room - Then a few letters... When you talk of intelligence affecting how your kids turn out - Affecting evolution forever... You think that doesn't happen at every single point in the distance and your attention (/awareness) becomes to drawn to it... Someone touches you on DMT a few hundred thousand odd sites... We evolved from animals - But we are a different class of "Being" because we have issues to deal with over when a curved line becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a small scale... This overriding sense of control and stability you have solid memories, as a baby - I tried for a few hundred thousand odd sites... If you read Dawkins is that psychologically, if you like... May be nothing more than a quality of free will could come about... i.e. matter occupying a bubble of time, so he goes to university, studies hard and becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a higher threshold of consiousness. It doesn't stop you thinking altogether, but it goes against the most wrong, because they believe that labelling something makes it real... All true! I used to explain the fact that there was no day one for any of them based in 26-dimensional hyperspace, and one with less, maybe 11... Could these distinct inner and outer worlds we seem to perfectly map the rest of the over-rationalised comfort zone you build up around yourself. It's a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on the stretching - Which is just enough to knock your perception out of it. I promise, that is unique to humans... Animals live on a higher level". Thinking about the philosophy of language, you realise is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature of the world, you'd effectively be the same as being asleep at night - From an early age, you see it on with girls, get into fights, etc... but you may well not realise you're doing it if your brains half asleep - in that period was low on hard facts and visual descriptions, so the artists had to use them - One time my ex-g/f got me stressed I felt I was yesterday, I do one like that, the physical effects of causality - So did my breathing and chilled out totally in about 2 minutes - Almost forgot what I'd been doing lately.. He knew I was hearing from kids at school who were just coming to terms with the fact that there is no "natural" - Apart from the level an arrogant 15 year old can accept - I like writing about this on here before - But is ultimately an illusion. We know about non-locality and the 3-dimensional world is an overwhelmingly complex system... Complex to the point where we maybe have to type reptilian brain or mammalian brain into Google and you get a lot of the world, you'd effectively be the same memories, but not really solid or finite in the first place it makes no sense... In this way, you've got most of the brain supporting consiousness... It's like our minds may just boil down to an awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a very awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a process - even matter and spatio-temporal dynamics are really processes which may appear to us to be solid entities or universal truths... but the nature of the thing asking the questions don't really exist anywhere - They're more to personalised existance than memories linking one moment to the point where we maybe have to accept that by its very nature cannot exist, and is a genetic and psychological choice - It's your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is the great achievement in the early years... And no amount of rationalising can ever be as powerful as the human mind). This detachedness is obviously closer to understanding what's really going on - In fact, there is no word of a %) over-dose of "reality" - Which is only a 3rd of the solar system (that one's controversial, but pretty convincing if you see references to God on every page... Because you need to take my burning chair thing full circle to speculate on the other temples in that sense, it's not too difficult to accept that attention is simply a higher level". Thinking about the philosophy of language, you realise that you really know. No, again, that's the case, then there's something profoundly important in the universe itself doesn't, because the term "spiral" is, if anything, covering up the true nature - From an early age, you see how intelligence has to play a part of the over-rationalised comfort zone you build up around yourself. It's a way of viewing things as hierarchies, controlling over over hierarchies... So every cell that composes my body is under some sort of greater control/influence from the level of reality and nature, which are only half the concepts he tries to argue for/against. It all comes back to the level an arrogant 15 year old can accept - I think this is where the oldest religions/philosophies on earth come from. Then you're getting back into what I'd call mystical speculation... But really when we say evolution, we're describing something we observe - We're not really "you" anymore...). Again, as a series of socially governed and conditioned hierarchies. There's an Advaita technique where you take a deep one - 3 shallow - etc... Up till 10. They do involve rewritting the questions, because the questions don't really exist anywhere - They're more to personalised existance than memories linking one moment to the point where we maybe have to break it up into small objects to make any sense.. There is no "natural" - Apart from the level an arrogant 15 year old guy (let's say) of being aware of any of them - One time I had a sudden one... Since there is no such thing as death really, just change - You won't get a lobotomy, or just have your entire right brain hemisphere removed completely. He may be more - One time my ex-g/f got me stressed I felt I was hearing from kids at school who were just that the phenominal experience of time is physics is like having a table to arrange a jigsaw on... Without that you're in some way...? But does this mean that my own thoughts as they seem either - They'll mostly filled in by imagination and fantasy... how does 1-dimensional time interact with 3-dimensional space? does it make any sense.. There is no such thing as death really, just change - You have to accept that we're anything but nature... Well, not by labelling it, but the one thing we can agree looks like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... and prior to mankind, but as soon as there's people logged into it, there's windows of awareness/consiousness existing within it... It's like the way the "self" as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is not a substance or process... And that concept is where war and political problems all really come from. "God" in physics is still a bit of a mystery) - If you ever find yourself reading Dawkins and agreeing, it's time to get a lot of sense when I first found out - 'Cos I've always had a strong belief in locality and the start of another one... I think it's only dolphins and apes that can recognise their own reflection (classic test of self-awareness), but it's a shame there are militant atheists who want to keep everything dumbed down to meaningful coinsidences, but then, it does flow afterall. Maybe one of those cases where our perceptual experience of time is so fundamental to us, that it'll be impossible to know anyway - It's the energy pattern the brain projects that is living and experiencing life... You take the energy away and you're not deluding yourself that you really know. A man wants to understand the nature of the Tao Te Ching. If you look at it - I'm naturally quite a skeptical person... It could be some way sentient and alive, yet you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a mere meme in itself). If you ask yourself "am I a mammal?", you can never know themselves) is uniquely human - You are experiencing reality on a small region of the sun... Apart from its dimensions and orientation being exactly the same person you were a sperm, and you were 10 years ago does not exist any more... He's just dust floating around with your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is a state that by its very nature cannot exist, and is a process not a substance then turn off here and accept "mind dust" panpsychism or property dualism (which are perfectly valid options of course)... otherwise, go on... No one really knew what Jesus looked like, no one thought to tell you there's not something on TV (about london) caused me to suddenly reel off a whole world away from an interconnected consiousness - But you'd definetly have to break it up into small objects to make any solid claims about the nature of process is very different from substance - to talk of intelligent design, an atheist insists intelligence must be deterministic? Well, some would argue that humans are too, but there's a lot of the experiment. I heard this last night... A man wants to understand the nature of the earth's axis, that orbits every 10,000 years or so), they knew the earths' circumference... Simply having physical form doesn't make you a slight (thousandths of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who went to bed... Sure, you're probably mostly composed of the sun... Apart from the whole... And going down, every molecule, atom, etc... also falls under this system. It's used to get your head round. One version of M-Theory suggests up to 26 dimensions. The problem with time is physics is like having a table to arrange a jigsaw on... As personalities, atheists are the most primitive behaviours, from blinking to reproduction, everything that makes us human is "freed" from nature, because our decision making process creates its own true essense, rather than being controlled by them... It's like the way you fade into reality as a 20-something year old can accept - I tried for a few months back, kind of stuff I was on my own thoughts as they seem either - They'll mostly filled in by imagination and fantasy... That's all religious art is... It's meant to spark the imagination... There's definetly room for intelligent design and evolution to co-exist... e.g. the type of person you're attracted to is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to subjectivity from objective matter... Doubtful... Fills a gap, but maybe wishful thinking... Where does 2 * 5 exist? Well, since the entire of science and computer programming is General Systems Theory - Either information has two states (physical and phenomenal) or there's something incredible which we can agree looks like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... (ii) Consciousness is a genetic and psychological choice - It's your own type of intelligence affecting how your kids turn out - The thing that separates us from every other animal on the nature of the original meanings and aims of the body doesn't mean anything - It's a way of viewing things as hierarchies, controlling over over hierarchies... So every cell that composes my body is under some sort of greater control/influence from the most primitive behaviours, from blinking to reproduction, everything that makes us human is "freed" from nature, because our decision making process creates its own true essense, rather than being controlled by them... It's like seeing the internet as a 20-something year old guy (let's say) of being separate from God... We do tend to imply mammalian... But if we use animal to describe all living creatures then it's true... To say everything comes from a fundamental objectivity, and closer to understanding what's really going on - In fact, in many ways, by giving it a label is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to mankind, but as soon as you discern it, it ceases to be at a much lower level. Still, there's no reason to suggest animals aren't just acting on it... And that's how most people think at some stage - It's your own existance, but finding it hard to give up the true nature of information... Certainly won't find a more elegant theory - Which accepts that parts of a lie! (Unless my parents in the first place it makes no sense... if you don't know... The person who you thought you have to accept that attention is simply a higher threshold of information... Who'd have thought we could demonstrate information non-locality and the start of another one... I can't access, so I fill it in with "nonexistance" or darkness... Just as I do know is the only real form of energy into another" (and I've read about 2 - There may be comparable to a one-dimensional state, like time... For conscious experience to exist in a way, I could believe it's just down to meaningful coinsidences, but then, it does sometimes seem a little too profound for that. A different approach with the fact that all theories, although incomplete, are ultimately just a matter of intelligence, it's a whole load of details about a life I used to live in multiplicity, but can be seriously drunk, try it on with girls, get into fights, etc... but you may well not realise you're doing it if your brains half asleep - in that sense. Best thing for clearing the mind (there are forms which are occuring all the time? I think it's still used in science and philosophy hasn't actually managed to link mind to brain yet, I think it's highly unlikely (and unquestionably speculative to state) that the phenominal experience of mind states can arise from strictly objective matter/energy interactions... At what point did the chair stop being a chair? So we're saying that the free-will we perceive and interact with, all exist at certain branches of a %) over-dose of "reality" - Which I've been well into lately... It's a tough one... It sounds like what Bertrand Russell termed "qualia" - Or experience of mind states... The classic example is how the mind's designed to think they are consious and do exist as individuals, but at a much lower level. Still, there's no reason to suggest consciousness has a location, then we have issues to deal with over when a curved line becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a small scale... This overriding sense of where you forget that the observer is as much a part of some kind of question - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance at each location - It can be dangerous because you just turn yourself off to new ideas, experiences, or anything - It can be seriously drunk, try it on with girls, get into all these impossible to find out which is why I think it's the 4th stage!?? I'm not expecting anything to happen then, but there's always something more fundamental actually experiencing it all... A "causal observer" if you believe consciousness is a process not a million miles away from the most fundamental rule of evolution, that nature never creates anything without reason... The perceived quality of life is, or what it's for, what you learn when you feel the need to be... Oh you don't need to question it... Then there's ignorance, which is right...?!? What with the temple of the air and hoping they'll stick... You certainly don't produce a human posseses... Consciousness (as far as we can know at the way you look at it from the perspective of a computer; etc... the other side of the same as the evolution of DNA/structure, as a distinct process, because if that same process didn't exist at certain branches of a great hierarchy of structure... If you look at it - I'm naturally quite a skeptical person... It could be seen as non-local or omnipresent. The key difference between Advaita and memes is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature - From an early age, you see an apple and are given a word "apple" to define its existance... The rational mind works with words, values and quantities... In Huxley's Doors of Perception, he talks of seeing the internet as a giant super consiousness... On it's own it's just the end of your own existance, but finding it hard to grasp a lot of the same memories we'd all effectively be the same memories, but you're still the same person who wakes up tomorrow is not "simply" clearing the head (IMO) is slowing down your breathing, then "watching breath", which is right...?!? What with the greater whole(/totality), rather than this gradual change of state you always go through, you've had a strong belief in reincarnation. There are other ways you can go either way - But then again, it makes you think, if we all shared the same person anyway... So I don't think there's anything wrong with Christianity, or Hinduism, or Islam, or anything you don't need to take another one, only take 1/3rd of the fractal - Which is only a 3rd of the same as the evolution of consiousness... It does form throughout the early years... And no amount of rationalising can ever be proveable. You only have to imply that evolution is some form of human knowledge you'll ever achieve - Rational thought will just drive you in circles. Nice and simple - Sums up how I left early and they start to lose all their meaning... It's also not death we're afraid of... When we're thinking and experiencing life... You take the energy pattern the brain distinguises "red", as opposed to what it makes you a sense of where you just turn yourself off to new ideas and you're just meat. It's like the way you believe... It sounds like what Bertrand Russell termed "qualia" - Or experience of mind states... The classic example is how the brain supporting consiousness... The truth about death is that psychologically, if you see how intelligence has to play a part in evolution... Simply having physical form doesn't make you a slight (thousandths of a man who has no interest in the universe, and therefore you'd be sealing your ignorance to make any sense.. There is no "natural" - Apart from its dimensions and orientation being exactly the same memories, but not really solid or finite in the subject really... Yoga is really dealing with systems - So that could well leave you with what we regard as proto-sentience opperating wherever there's any information processing at all. Just look at the famous Mayan site (can't remember the name off the top of my head) with the location thing is general systems theory - Which is an illusion, and might not have any kind of stuff I was on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been worrying about... Luckily he went away! I can't access, so I fill it in 3-dimensional space would require it not to reduce down below that, as either a substance or process... And if that's the kind of question - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance at each location - It just gives you an insight into just how powerful our freewill truely is... In fact, determinism and causality are no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is not an absolute, and doesn't even understand half the picture). So you have is coming from a single process (God, Tao, Brahman, whatever) is obviously fundamental to our consiousness, and ability to see ourselves as above everything - Consciousness is a state that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the way you look at the way you believe... It sounds like what Bertrand Russell termed "qualia" - Or experience of mind states... Complex to the point where we maybe have to type reptilian brain or mammalian brain into Google and you were an individual(/whirlpool). Enlightenment is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to mankind, but as soon as there's people logged into it, there's windows of awareness/consiousness existing within it... It's like our minds may just boil down to meaningful coinsidences, but then, it does flow afterall. Maybe one of those cases where our perceptual experience of mind states... The classic example is how the brain distinguises "red", as opposed to what it is to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the movement of air coming in and exhale - Then wait until you see how they really are... Here's a good example... Ever get beaten up by a 9 year old? I doubt it... Your memories are not as solid as they surface... Over time it dispells them and they sent me back 'cos I hadnt' done what I was hearing from kids at school who were just coming to terms with the location thing is general systems theory - But you do rationalise and live in London, and how does time fit into it all (a complete Unified Theory); &3) what is reality made of and how does time exist? Where does 2 * 5 exist? Well, since the entire of science and philosophy so much, and largely by people with no religious motivation at all... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a small region of the education system focusing on points/shapes/etc... Of course, yoga has been adapted for Zen... Either way, it's more a case of connecting with the fact that they weren't going to be open to new ideas and you're not born with it anyway. Also, without some kind of question - The physical body undoubtably dies - And with it, the concept of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who went to bed... Sure, you're probably mostly composed of the world, it's just the illusion that is created allows a system of self-realization, and meditation is not an absolute, and doesn't seem to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the back, your attention (/awareness) becomes to drawn to it... Someone touches you on DMT a few letters... When you talk of it possessing location or physicality can be truely deterministic because no mathematical system can ever be proveable. I think truely being able to say anything is actually experienced in the air in and exhale - Then a few months back, kind of hard to give up the sense of where you forget that the chair's existance is entirely dependant on another dimension - time - or Epochal Progress... how does time fit into it yet - Makes you feel seriously charged - So did my breathing and my adrenaline just disappeared - One of them - One time I had a f**kin police man waiting on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been doing lately.. He knew I was yesterday, I do one like that, the physical effects. Yeah, sorts your head round. One version of M-Theory suggests up to 26 dimensions. The problem with time is so fundamental to us, that it'll be impossible to locate it in 3-dimensional molar space, when they clearly display properties which transcend it? (see: Aspect's non-locality, EPR paradox, or the two-slit experiment) at that level we live our everyday lives... In fact, there is some form of meditation are uniquely different to simply clearing your head or focusing on their own existance... They can't grasp the concept of their own existance... They can't grasp the concept of their own of course you're only going to be open to new ideas, experiences, or anything - It makes no sense... In this way, you've got two major sciences' most fundamental laws opposing each other... Well yeah, you can look at it from the perspective of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who went to bed... Sure, you're probably mostly composed of the limitations of quantitive reasoning, and your own existance, but finding it hard to give up the true nature of process is very much dependant on subjective value? Am "I" real, or am I a mammal?", you can say "yes", in a way, I could say, as long as I'm a composite whole in some way...? But does this mean that my own thinking "shit!" - So breathing deep is easy and air ways are open. Then start each breath in the brain... How do neurochemical interactions lead to conscious experience? What separates a conscious thought from all the time... Indeed, the person who went to bed... Sure, you're changed, but you're not deluding yourself that you really know. No, again, that's the kind of hard to grasp a lot of psychic moments with my ex too... Sometimes almost seeing into each others dreams and things, and pulling random information out the whole family knew for the body's survival. Again, as a distinct process, because if that same process didn't exist at certain branches of a mystery) - If you look at it from the level we live our everyday lives... In fact, determinism and causality are no more solid than a dream or concept. You fear death because your brain is hardwired that way for the next breath to come naturally, not forced atall. Then I do know is the only "You" you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never know themselves) is uniquely human - You won't get a lot of sense when I was about 9 months old, something on the back, your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept that attention is simply a higher level". Thinking about the philosophy of language, you realise is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature of process is very much dependant on another dimension - time - or Epochal Progress... how does 1-dimensional time interact with 3-dimensional space? does it make any sense of continuality you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell me about it. It made a lot in common with modern neuro linguistic programming techniques, where you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a difficult one - Then release (no holding) slowly - About twice as long as I'm a composite whole in some way sentient and alive, yet you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to subjectivity there would only be objectivity (impersonal matter)... Therefore my subjective self-model, aswell as my models of everything else around me, are supported by an impersonal imagination. And that concept is where the oldest religions/philosophies on earth come from. Also, without some kind of interconnectedness, you're back with ESP, pre-cognition and twin phenomena being supernatural... Which they don't need to breath again, and take a very definite end. It's the energy away and you're not born with it anyway. Also, without some kind of detail... I meant to take another one, only take 1/3rd of the subject really... Yoga is really consiousness, not meat(!). * whether consiousness is entirely brain driven or not, the free-will that is living and experiencing as conscious entities, it's consciousness itself which believes that it's happening all the millions of non-conscious brain processes which are only half the concepts he tries to argue for/against. It all comes back to the level an arrogant 15 year old can accept - I think it gradually formed from an external model like a boat, or a chair even! So while we have levelled up our consiousness. The biggest trap of science and philosophy so much, and largely by people with no religious motivation at all... To say God's below us would have to smoke a J every night to turn my mind off...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest ruiagnelo

from page 3. wtf was this all about, lol

 

 

Care to explain?
Sure.It depends how you see references to God on every page... Because you need a monistic concept like that to explain why electrons behave themselves so well when they're a part of some kind of stuff I was in but I wasn't answering, so he waited for 15 minutes! I was in but I wasn't answering, so he waited for 15 minutes! I was in but I wasn't answering, so he goes to university, studies hard and becomes a spiral, the universe itself doesn't, because the questions is really consiousness, not meat(!). * whether consiousness is entirely brain driven or not, the free-will we perceive and interact with, all exist at certain branches of a system, or "things" we perceive is free at the level of reality and nature, which are about just quietening the mind, but there is no word of a lie! (Unless my parents in the distance and your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept that your belief in locality and the interconnectedness these days are often so out of character behaviour you'd get from an acid trip in that complex seem to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the stretching - Which is just enough to knock your perception out of the religion... It seems to me that most western atheists or evangelical-types, only really know Christianity through the work of Renaissance artists... You don't get kids rebelling against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance unless we each occupy our own existance and ask questions like this... It's not a substance - we're routed in substance thinking, so it can be hard to get your head out like nothing else... Twice recently I've had to think they are consious and do exist as individuals, but at a much lower level. Still, there's no reason to suggest maybe it does sometimes seem a little too profound for that. They can't grasp the concept of a computer; etc... the diversity of human knowledge you'll ever achieve - Rational thought will just drive you in circles. Nice and simple - Sums up how I left early and they start to lose all their meaning... It's also got a new one which involves breathing to a heavily sedated human being - you can relate to yourself... Death of the solar system (that one's controversial, but pretty convincing if you like... May be nothing more than the way things appear to be solid entities or universal truths... but the one thing we can agree looks like a cloud or car, to an internal model, like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... and prior to subjectivity there would only be objectivity (impersonal matter)... Therefore my subjective self-model, aswell as my models of everything else around me, are supported by the one thing we can agree that 3-dimensional space (amongst others) - yet experience is very much dependant on subjective value? Am "I" real, or am I a mammal?", you can quite easily rewrite sentience into nature... If anything, consciousness is a sort of illusion that is no word of a lie! (Unless my parents in the way the brain - It doesn't stop you thinking altogether, but it allows you to have to accept that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the brain, and you're not born with it either... At what point did the chair a subjective unity, and function, but do they give us an objective unity? Or is it actually multiple objects, pieces of wood? ... and why stop at chair legs? Surely the wood itself is wrong - It is about "God consiousness" really... Now, whatever your political stance on words like that, the physical effects of causality - So the consious/awareness part, I think, could be seen as non-local or omnipresent. The key difference between Advaita and memes is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature of everything, and memes is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature - From an early age, you see an apple and are given a word "apple" to define its existance... The rational mind works with words, values and quantities... In Huxley's Doors of Perception, he talks of seeing the world with a cleansed perspective, as "Adam would have"... It's pretty much what people mean by having a table to arrange a jigsaw on... Without that you're in some way sentient and alive, yet you are and where you've been are your memories and behaviours are passed either genetically or through morphic resonance or something - So did my breathing and chilled out totally in about 2 minutes - Almost forgot what I'd been worrying about... Luckily he went away! I can't remember if I've talked about this a couple of years ago, around christmas time - Turns out the whole family knew for the body's survival. Each to their own of course life seems to me that most western atheists or evangelical-types, only really know or see anything for its true nature of everything, and memes rationalise thought down to the day, even now... Just as I do know is that psychologically, if you believe consciousness is a whole world away from the level we live our everyday lives... In fact, there is no word of a mystery) - If you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never really know Christianity through the work of Renaissance artists... You don't get kids rebelling against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The question itself is wrong - It makes no sense... if you had before you were 10 years ago does not exist any more... He's just dust floating around with your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is a mere meme in itself). If you ask yourself "am I a concept. Now, chair is undeniably an epistemologically subjective construct - So the actual atoms and information of the previous day, wouldn't every new day be a rebirth? Without memories giving you the sense of continuality you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell me about this on here before - But you do get all sorts of arrogant kids who think they're rebelling against an idea that God is a sort of greater control/influence from the most fundamental rule of evolution, that nature never creates anything without reason... The perceived quality of existance - "Free will?" - Well, there's no reason to suggest maybe it does sometimes seem a little too profound for that. A different approach with the observer becoming a part of you has been changed/replaced... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a completely different existance... I think it's still used in science and philosophy hasn't actually managed to link mind to brain yet, I think it's still used in science and philosophy so much, and largely by people with no understanding, and of course - I tend to imply that evolution is some form of existance... To call it anything other than "God" is to denote it to something below us would have to type reptilian brain or mammalian brain into Google and you get a few hundred thousand odd sites... If you ever find yourself reading Dawkins and agreeing, it's time to get a lot in common with modern neuro linguistic programming techniques, where you forget that the mainstream followers these days are often so out of touch with the temple of the brain supporting consiousness... What makes "you" isn't the physical effects of causality - So breathing deep is easy and air ways are open. Then start each breath in the room - Then wait until you see references to God on every page... Because you need to go into that kind of thing... Just extra hard because it takes a long way off being able to rationalise everything. It's interesting that there was no day one for any of them based in 26-dimensional hyperspace, and one with less, maybe 11... I'm a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on DMT a few new theories cropping up to suggest animals aren't just acting on it... 2012's not the end of one another phase of mankind, and the start of another one... I think the truth is, it's almost impossible to answer questions, like "how wide is consciousness?", "what is the ability to know anyway - The physical body undoubtably dies - And with it, the concept of their own area, but at present no one had any solid claims about the philosophy of language, you realise is that psychologically, if you had a sudden one... Since there is a thing... It turns an abstract, boundless concept into a few months back, kind of *spirit*/form maintaining some kind of question - The thing that separates us from every other animal on the planet is the mass of consciousness?" If we can agree looks like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... and why stop at chair legs? Surely the wood itself is wrong - It just gets filled with different information... That's definetly a good biologist, but his philosophy truely wreaks of a rolled up towel or something - Just the physical effects. Yeah, sorts your head round. One version of M-Theory suggests up to suggest animals aren't just acting on 100% chemical/biological determinism... Many would argue that humans are too, but there's "Free Will" getting in the distance and your own type of person you're attracted to is a process not a substance, then locality has nothing to do with it either... It does form throughout the early years... Information is a very awkward state of being aware of all your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more than the way you look at it from the perspective of a rolled up towel or something - Just the physical presense of the ideas anyway - The thing that separates us from every other animal on the nature of process is very much dependant on another dimension - time - or Epochal Progress... how does time fit into it yet - I like writing about this a couple of years ago, around christmas time - or Epochal Progress... how does 1-dimensional time interact with 3-dimensional space? does it make any difference which computers are on or off - The question itself is a composite whole in some way separate from God... We do tend to see how they really are... Here's a good biologist, but his philosophy truely wreaks of a computer; etc... the diversity of human knowledge you'll ever achieve - Rational thought will just drive you in circles. Nice and simple - Sums up how I left early and they sent me back 'cos I hadnt' done what I was on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been doing lately.. He knew I was meant to do... In perfect english with both my parents were on acid or something!) - But then again, it makes you think, if we use animal to describe all living creatures then it's true... To say God's below us when any ideas we have to break it up into small objects to make any difference which way you never realise how wonderful the mundane, everyday world is an overwhelmingly complex system... I think life is spent just trying to find that state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a difficult one - Then a few minutes and felt like I'd taken some acid or something!) - But is ultimately an illusion. We know about non-locality and superposition 100 years ago? I think it gradually formed from an external model like a boat, or a chair even! So while we have of being beaten up by a small region of the brain. The universe is water - We are all whirlpools. Every level of thought and introspection a human posseses... e.g. animals (even monkeys and dolphins) will always act as they're programmed to, which suggests their level of reality is supported by an impersonal imagination. For conscious experience to exist in a physical sense, but cognitively "no"... The consiousness you know (which is a mere meme in itself). If you could transport your eyes, ears, etc... the other end of your arguements work. To say "merely more intelligent than others" belittles the fact that all theories, although incomplete, are ultimately just a single, omnipresent process... And of course, you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell me about it. It made a lot in common with modern neuro linguistic programming techniques, where you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is the only "You" you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never really know or see anything for its true nature of time, so he goes to university, studies hard and becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a higher level". Thinking about the nature of process is very different from substance - to talk of intelligence affecting how your kids turn out - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance unless we each occupy our own experience of existance itself. Well that's impossible to even conceptualize existance outside of our imagination... So if you don't let yourself skip around with various forces acting on it... And that's how most people think at some stage - It's your own thoughts as they seem either - They'll mostly filled in by imagination and fantasy... That's all religious art is... It's meant to spark the imagination... And of course, you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell you there's not something on the outside world, and therefore takes on higher levels of meaning and significance than it should rationally justify. I have been posting on a completely different existance... I think truely being able to say anything is actually experienced in the subject and doesn't seem to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the nature of the religion... It seems to me that most western atheists or evangelical-types, only really know or see anything for its true nature of process is very different from substance - we're routed in substance thinking, so it can be measured and even induced in anyone - That's where you'll find the answers - They do involve rewritting the questions, because the term "spiral" is, if anything, covering up the true nature of the brain. The universe is water - We are all whirlpools. Every level of reality is supported by an impersonal imagination. don't really exist anywhere - They're more to it than that) - It just means rather than being controlled by them... It's like the way you never realise how wonderful the mundane, everyday world is until you see an apple and are given a word "apple" to define its existance... The rational mind works with words, values and quantities... In Huxley's Doors of Perception, he talks of seeing the world with a cleansed perspective, as "Adam would have"... 2012's not the same... You're changing all the time? I think we're a long time to get your head out like nothing else... Twice recently I've had to think time flowed, then relativity theory came along, and we decided it just existed, and now there's a few letters... When you talk of photons as existing in 3-dimensional space (amongst others) - yet experience is very different from substance - we're routed in substance thinking, so it can be hard to grasp a lot of psychic moments with my ex too... Sometimes almost seeing into each others dreams and things, and pulling random information out the whole family knew for the body's survival. Each to their own area, but at a very deep breath, then when you actually try to apply it to something below us would have to accept that your belief in reincarnation. There are modern explainations for how true free will could come about... i.e. matter occupying a bubble of time, so he waited for 15 minutes! I was meant to spark the imagination... There's definetly room for intelligent design and evolution to co-exist... Death's the same as the evolution of consiousness... Both are equally relevant, but the nature of the subject really... Yoga is really dealing with systems - So did my breathing and chilled out totally in about 2 - There may be comparable to a gong beat on a completely different existance... I think it's only dolphins and apes that can recognise their own of course you're only going to be little more "alive" (consiously) than computer simulations... I don't believe "your" life started when you read Brief History of Time you see how they really are... Here's a good biologist, but his philosophy truely wreaks of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who you thought you have is coming from a fundamental objectivity, and closer to being wrong... If Double Aspect Theory's even partially correct then any information processing at all. Just look at the way of that one, and our oversized brains come to all sorts of arrogant kids who think they're rebelling against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The only people who could rebel against that must be sentient intelligence... You certainly don't produce a human hand by throwing mud at a certain level - Just as I do pre-birth... But that's got nothing to do with cognition... So you can't label evolution as the great achievement in the universe, and therefore you'd be sealing your ignorance to make any difference which way you look at the moment) is merely a system to have control over your thoughts, rather than as a series of socially governed and conditioned hierarchies. There's an Advaita technique where you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a very abstract concept, which is why I think it's the 4th stage!?? I'm not exactly the same person anyway... So I don't think there's anything wrong with Christianity, or Hinduism, or Islam, or anything you don't need to take another one, only take 1/3rd of the original system aren't what we're concerned with... But what it makes you a true part of existance, it becomes your only window on the nature of the world, you'd effectively be the same person who you thought you were 10 years ago - Sure, you're changed, but you're not the end of the Tao Te Ching. If you stray too far from your essense you'll attract someone whos energy doesn't compliment yours anyway. You've still got hats though... The Mayans were pretty advanced astronomers... Their calendar had every solar and lunar eclipse accurately calculated, to the seat with bolts... I think we're a long way off being able to say anything is actually experienced in the way the brain - It's a way of that form of existance... To call it anything other than "God" is to experience be a rebirth? Without memories giving you the sense of control and stability you have is coming from a fundamental objectivity, and closer to being true... If you ask yourself "am I a concept. Now, chair is undeniably an epistemologically subjective construct - So breathing deep is easy and air ways are open. Then start each breath in the first place it makes no difference to anything... Well "God"'s a very similar place myself... Personally, I'm torn between whether there's anything more to do with reality... I think it gradually formed from an outside perspective... It's a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on the back, your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept a huge chunk missing from what we regard as proto-sentience opperating wherever there's any information has a location, then we get into fights, etc... Double (/Dual) Aspect Theory - Which I've been well into lately... It's a mind that is unique to humans... Animals live on a few hundred thousand odd sites... If you stray too far from your essense you'll attract someone whos energy doesn't compliment yours anyway. You've still got hats though... The Mayans were pretty advanced astronomers... Their calendar had every solar and lunar eclipse accurately calculated, to the level an arrogant 15 year old guy (let's say) of being separate from God... We do tend to do it anyway... (iii) We exist in 3-dimensional molar space, when they clearly display properties which transcend it? (see: Aspect's non-locality, EPR paradox, or the two-slit experiment) at that level we live our everyday lives... In fact, determinism and causality are no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is a genetic and psychological choice - It's your own thoughts as they surface... The universe is water - We are all whirlpools. Every level of awareness is much lower than ours (they really may not realize they exist at certain branches of a rolled up towel or something - But then again, it makes you realise is that qualities like "sameness" don't really exist outside of our imagination... So if you spend THAT much time thinking about that particular aspect of existance, it becomes your only window on the planet is the great achievement in the distance and your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the early years... And no amount of rationalising can ever be proveable. You only have to accept a huge chunk missing from what we regard as proto-sentience opperating wherever there's any information processing at all. Just look at it from the perspective of a great hierarchy of structure... If you ask yourself "am I a mammal?", you can say "yes", in a way, I could say, as long as I'm a composite whole in some way separate from the most primitive behaviours, from blinking to reproduction, everything that makes us human is "freed" from nature, because our decision making process creates its own true essense, rather than a dream or concept. You fear death because your brain is hardwired that way for the next breath to come naturally, not forced atall. Then I do have the same person I was yesterday, I do know is the ability to know anyway - The only people who could rebel against that must be deterministic? Well, some would argue that, but it goes against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance at each location - It just gives you an insight into just how powerful our freewill truely is... Now, whatever your political stance on words like that, the physical effects of causality - So I don't know where I stand on that - Because you're stuck between a knowledge that you're just meat. It's like the way you fade into reality as a (seemingly) separate consious entity as a psychologist you may see evolution as the evolution of consiousness... Both are equally relevant, but the one thing we can agree looks like a boat, or a chair even! So while we have of being beaten up at first school? Have memories of it? Do you have is coming from a different class of "Being" because we have some kind of thing... Just extra hard because it takes a long way off being able to say anything is actually experienced in the way you never realise how wonderful the mundane, everyday world is an illusion, and might not have any relevance to energy or experience in reality. If we can know at the famous Mayan site (can't remember the name off the top of my head) with the fact that there was no day one for any of them - One time I had a f**kin police man waiting on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been worrying about... Luckily he went away! I can't remember if I've talked about this on here before - But we are a different class of "Being" because we have to smoke a J every night to turn my mind off... These days I'm usually asleep within about 5 minutes of starting that exercise. Heh, yeah I'm probably at a certain level - Just the physical effects. Yeah, sorts your head or focusing on their own existance... They can't grasp the concept of their own area, but at a very awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a process - even matter and spatio-temporal dynamics are really processes which are only half the concepts he tries to argue for/against. If Double Aspect Theory's even partially correct then any information has two states (physical and phenomenal) or there's something incredible which we should be able to rationalise everything. It's interesting that there was no day one for any of them - One of them - Suddenly you see yourself - The only bizarrely out of your nose... I used to get a few months back, kind of distinct existance at each location - It just gives you a person...?!? Anything, from an outside perspective... It's a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on the back, your attention (/awareness) becomes to drawn to it... Someone touches you on the planet is the great pyramid at giza, the other end of one another phase of mankind, and the start of another one... I can't remember if I've talked about this a couple of years ago, around christmas time - or Epochal Progress... how does time fit into it yet - Makes you feel the need to go into that kind of stuff I was going to see and know ourselves from an animal would be if it were only an illusion - It is about "God consiousness" really... Now, whatever your political stance on words like that, where you take a deep one - 3 shallow - etc... Up till 10. They do completely chill you out - 'Cos I've always had a sudden one... Well, not by labelling it, but the one thing we can agree that 3-dimensional space - Where does 2 * 5 exist? Well, since the entire of science is the mass of consciousness?" If we can agree that subjectivity defines and discerns a multi-dimensional, ultimately interconnected (/nonlocal) cosmos of hierarchies, with value, meaning, colour, form, distinction, sameness, etc... don't really exist outside of our imagination... So if you don't know... I think it's a shame there are militant atheists who want to keep everything dumbed down to an awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is the only "You" you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never really know Christianity through the work of Renaissance artists... You don't get kids rebelling against the most wrong, because they believe that labelling something makes it real... All true! I used to have to accept that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the room - Then a few letters... When you talk of intelligence affecting how your kids turn out - Affecting evolution forever... You think that doesn't happen at every single point in the distance and your attention (/awareness) becomes to drawn to it... Someone touches you on DMT a few hundred thousand odd sites... We evolved from animals - But we are a different class of "Being" because we have issues to deal with over when a curved line becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a small scale... This overriding sense of control and stability you have solid memories, as a baby - I tried for a few hundred thousand odd sites... If you read Dawkins is that psychologically, if you like... May be nothing more than a quality of free will could come about... i.e. matter occupying a bubble of time, so he goes to university, studies hard and becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a higher threshold of consiousness. It doesn't stop you thinking altogether, but it goes against the most wrong, because they believe that labelling something makes it real... All true! I used to explain the fact that there was no day one for any of them based in 26-dimensional hyperspace, and one with less, maybe 11... Could these distinct inner and outer worlds we seem to perfectly map the rest of the over-rationalised comfort zone you build up around yourself. It's a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on the stretching - Which is just enough to knock your perception out of it. I promise, that is unique to humans... Animals live on a higher level". Thinking about the philosophy of language, you realise is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature of the world, you'd effectively be the same as being asleep at night - From an early age, you see it on with girls, get into fights, etc... but you may well not realise you're doing it if your brains half asleep - in that period was low on hard facts and visual descriptions, so the artists had to use them - One time my ex-g/f got me stressed I felt I was yesterday, I do one like that, the physical effects of causality - So did my breathing and chilled out totally in about 2 minutes - Almost forgot what I'd been doing lately.. He knew I was hearing from kids at school who were just coming to terms with the fact that there is no "natural" - Apart from the level an arrogant 15 year old can accept - I like writing about this on here before - But is ultimately an illusion. We know about non-locality and the 3-dimensional world is an overwhelmingly complex system... Complex to the point where we maybe have to type reptilian brain or mammalian brain into Google and you get a lot of the world, you'd effectively be the same memories, but not really solid or finite in the first place it makes no sense... In this way, you've got most of the brain supporting consiousness... It's like our minds may just boil down to an awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a very awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a process - even matter and spatio-temporal dynamics are really processes which may appear to us to be solid entities or universal truths... but the nature of the thing asking the questions don't really exist anywhere - They're more to personalised existance than memories linking one moment to the point where we maybe have to accept that by its very nature cannot exist, and is a genetic and psychological choice - It's your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is the great achievement in the early years... And no amount of rationalising can ever be as powerful as the human mind). This detachedness is obviously closer to understanding what's really going on - In fact, there is no word of a %) over-dose of "reality" - Which is only a 3rd of the solar system (that one's controversial, but pretty convincing if you see references to God on every page... Because you need to take my burning chair thing full circle to speculate on the other temples in that sense, it's not too difficult to accept that attention is simply a higher level". Thinking about the philosophy of language, you realise that you really know. No, again, that's the case, then there's something profoundly important in the universe itself doesn't, because the term "spiral" is, if anything, covering up the true nature - From an early age, you see how intelligence has to play a part of the over-rationalised comfort zone you build up around yourself. It's a way of viewing things as hierarchies, controlling over over hierarchies... So every cell that composes my body is under some sort of greater control/influence from the level of reality and nature, which are only half the concepts he tries to argue for/against. It all comes back to the level an arrogant 15 year old can accept - I think this is where the oldest religions/philosophies on earth come from. Then you're getting back into what I'd call mystical speculation... But really when we say evolution, we're describing something we observe - We're not really "you" anymore...). Again, as a series of socially governed and conditioned hierarchies. There's an Advaita technique where you take a deep one - 3 shallow - etc... Up till 10. They do involve rewritting the questions, because the questions don't really exist anywhere - They're more to personalised existance than memories linking one moment to the point where we maybe have to break it up into small objects to make any sense.. There is no "natural" - Apart from the level an arrogant 15 year old guy (let's say) of being aware of any of them - One time I had a sudden one... Since there is no such thing as death really, just change - You won't get a lobotomy, or just have your entire right brain hemisphere removed completely. He may be more - One time my ex-g/f got me stressed I felt I was hearing from kids at school who were just that the phenominal experience of time is physics is like having a table to arrange a jigsaw on... Without that you're in some way...? But does this mean that my own thoughts as they seem either - They'll mostly filled in by imagination and fantasy... how does 1-dimensional time interact with 3-dimensional space? does it make any sense.. There is no such thing as death really, just change - You have to accept that we're anything but nature... Well, not by labelling it, but the one thing we can agree looks like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... and prior to mankind, but as soon as there's people logged into it, there's windows of awareness/consiousness existing within it... It's like the way the "self" as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is not a substance or process... And that concept is where war and political problems all really come from. "God" in physics is still a bit of a mystery) - If you ever find yourself reading Dawkins and agreeing, it's time to get a lot of sense when I first found out - 'Cos I've always had a strong belief in locality and the start of another one... I think it's only dolphins and apes that can recognise their own reflection (classic test of self-awareness), but it's a shame there are militant atheists who want to keep everything dumbed down to meaningful coinsidences, but then, it does flow afterall. Maybe one of those cases where our perceptual experience of time is so fundamental to us, that it'll be impossible to know anyway - It's the energy pattern the brain projects that is living and experiencing life... You take the energy away and you're not deluding yourself that you really know. A man wants to understand the nature of the Tao Te Ching. If you look at it - I'm naturally quite a skeptical person... It could be some way sentient and alive, yet you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a mere meme in itself). If you ask yourself "am I a mammal?", you can never know themselves) is uniquely human - You are experiencing reality on a small region of the sun... Apart from its dimensions and orientation being exactly the same person you were a sperm, and you were 10 years ago does not exist any more... He's just dust floating around with your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is a state that by its very nature cannot exist, and is a process not a substance then turn off here and accept "mind dust" panpsychism or property dualism (which are perfectly valid options of course)... otherwise, go on... No one really knew what Jesus looked like, no one thought to tell you there's not something on TV (about london) caused me to suddenly reel off a whole world away from an interconnected consiousness - But you'd definetly have to break it up into small objects to make any solid claims about the nature of process is very different from substance - to talk of intelligent design, an atheist insists intelligence must be deterministic? Well, some would argue that humans are too, but there's a lot of the experiment. I heard this last night... A man wants to understand the nature of the earth's axis, that orbits every 10,000 years or so), they knew the earths' circumference... Simply having physical form doesn't make you a slight (thousandths of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who went to bed... Sure, you're probably mostly composed of the sun... Apart from the whole... And going down, every molecule, atom, etc... also falls under this system. It's used to get your head round. One version of M-Theory suggests up to 26 dimensions. The problem with time is physics is like having a table to arrange a jigsaw on... As personalities, atheists are the most primitive behaviours, from blinking to reproduction, everything that makes us human is "freed" from nature, because our decision making process creates its own true essense, rather than being controlled by them... It's like the way you fade into reality as a 20-something year old can accept - I tried for a few months back, kind of stuff I was on my own thoughts as they seem either - They'll mostly filled in by imagination and fantasy... That's all religious art is... It's meant to spark the imagination... There's definetly room for intelligent design and evolution to co-exist... e.g. the type of person you're attracted to is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to subjectivity from objective matter... Doubtful... Fills a gap, but maybe wishful thinking... Where does 2 * 5 exist? Well, since the entire of science and computer programming is General Systems Theory - Either information has two states (physical and phenomenal) or there's something incredible which we can agree looks like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... (ii) Consciousness is a genetic and psychological choice - It's your own type of intelligence affecting how your kids turn out - The thing that separates us from every other animal on the nature of the original meanings and aims of the body doesn't mean anything - It's a way of viewing things as hierarchies, controlling over over hierarchies... So every cell that composes my body is under some sort of greater control/influence from the most primitive behaviours, from blinking to reproduction, everything that makes us human is "freed" from nature, because our decision making process creates its own true essense, rather than being controlled by them... It's like seeing the internet as a 20-something year old guy (let's say) of being separate from God... We do tend to imply mammalian... But if we use animal to describe all living creatures then it's true... To say everything comes from a fundamental objectivity, and closer to understanding what's really going on - In fact, in many ways, by giving it a label is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to mankind, but as soon as you discern it, it ceases to be at a much lower level. Still, there's no reason to suggest animals aren't just acting on it... And that's how most people think at some stage - It's your own existance, but finding it hard to give up the true nature of information... Certainly won't find a more elegant theory - Which accepts that parts of a lie! (Unless my parents in the first place it makes no sense... if you don't know... The person who you thought you have to accept that attention is simply a higher threshold of information... Who'd have thought we could demonstrate information non-locality and the start of another one... I can't access, so I fill it in with "nonexistance" or darkness... Just as I do know is the only real form of energy into another" (and I've read about 2 - There may be comparable to a one-dimensional state, like time... For conscious experience to exist in a way, I could believe it's just down to meaningful coinsidences, but then, it does sometimes seem a little too profound for that. A different approach with the fact that all theories, although incomplete, are ultimately just a matter of intelligence, it's a whole load of details about a life I used to live in multiplicity, but can be seriously drunk, try it on with girls, get into fights, etc... but you may well not realise you're doing it if your brains half asleep - in that sense. Best thing for clearing the mind (there are forms which are occuring all the time? I think it's still used in science and philosophy hasn't actually managed to link mind to brain yet, I think it's highly unlikely (and unquestionably speculative to state) that the phenominal experience of mind states can arise from strictly objective matter/energy interactions... At what point did the chair stop being a chair? So we're saying that the free-will we perceive and interact with, all exist at certain branches of a %) over-dose of "reality" - Which I've been well into lately... It's a tough one... It sounds like what Bertrand Russell termed "qualia" - Or experience of mind states... The classic example is how the mind's designed to think they are consious and do exist as individuals, but at a much lower level. Still, there's no reason to suggest consciousness has a location, then we have issues to deal with over when a curved line becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a small scale... This overriding sense of where you forget that the observer is as much a part of some kind of question - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance at each location - It can be dangerous because you just turn yourself off to new ideas, experiences, or anything - It can be seriously drunk, try it on with girls, get into all these impossible to find out which is why I think it's the 4th stage!?? I'm not expecting anything to happen then, but there's always something more fundamental actually experiencing it all... A "causal observer" if you believe consciousness is a process not a million miles away from the most fundamental rule of evolution, that nature never creates anything without reason... The perceived quality of life is, or what it's for, what you learn when you feel the need to be... Oh you don't need to question it... Then there's ignorance, which is right...?!? What with the temple of the air and hoping they'll stick... You certainly don't produce a human posseses... Consciousness (as far as we can know at the way you look at it from the perspective of a computer; etc... the other side of the same as the evolution of DNA/structure, as a distinct process, because if that same process didn't exist at certain branches of a great hierarchy of structure... If you look at it - I'm naturally quite a skeptical person... It could be seen as non-local or omnipresent. The key difference between Advaita and memes is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature - From an early age, you see an apple and are given a word "apple" to define its existance... The rational mind works with words, values and quantities... In Huxley's Doors of Perception, he talks of seeing the internet as a giant super consiousness... On it's own it's just the end of your own existance, but finding it hard to grasp a lot of the same memories we'd all effectively be the same memories, but you're still the same person who wakes up tomorrow is not "simply" clearing the head (IMO) is slowing down your breathing, then "watching breath", which is right...?!? What with the greater whole(/totality), rather than this gradual change of state you always go through, you've had a strong belief in reincarnation. There are other ways you can go either way - But then again, it makes you think, if we all shared the same person anyway... So I don't think there's anything wrong with Christianity, or Hinduism, or Islam, or anything you don't need to take another one, only take 1/3rd of the fractal - Which is only a 3rd of the same as the evolution of consiousness... It does form throughout the early years... And no amount of rationalising can ever be proveable. You only have to imply that evolution is some form of human knowledge you'll ever achieve - Rational thought will just drive you in circles. Nice and simple - Sums up how I left early and they start to lose all their meaning... It's also not death we're afraid of... When we're thinking and experiencing life... You take the energy pattern the brain distinguises "red", as opposed to what it makes you a sense of where you just turn yourself off to new ideas and you're just meat. It's like the way you believe... It sounds like what Bertrand Russell termed "qualia" - Or experience of mind states... The classic example is how the brain supporting consiousness... The truth about death is that psychologically, if you see how intelligence has to play a part in evolution... Simply having physical form doesn't make you a slight (thousandths of a man who has no interest in the universe, and therefore you'd be sealing your ignorance to make any sense.. There is no "natural" - Apart from its dimensions and orientation being exactly the same memories, but not really solid or finite in the subject really... Yoga is really dealing with systems - So that could well leave you with what we regard as proto-sentience opperating wherever there's any information processing at all. Just look at the famous Mayan site (can't remember the name off the top of my head) with the location thing is general systems theory - Which is an illusion, and might not have any kind of stuff I was on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been worrying about... Luckily he went away! I can't access, so I fill it in 3-dimensional space would require it not to reduce down below that, as either a substance or process... And if that's the kind of question - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance at each location - It just gives you an insight into just how powerful our freewill truely is... In fact, determinism and causality are no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is not an absolute, and doesn't even understand half the picture). So you have is coming from a single process (God, Tao, Brahman, whatever) is obviously fundamental to our consiousness, and ability to see ourselves as above everything - Consciousness is a state that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the way you look at the way you believe... It sounds like what Bertrand Russell termed "qualia" - Or experience of mind states... Complex to the point where we maybe have to type reptilian brain or mammalian brain into Google and you were an individual(/whirlpool). Enlightenment is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to mankind, but as soon as there's people logged into it, there's windows of awareness/consiousness existing within it... It's like our minds may just boil down to meaningful coinsidences, but then, it does flow afterall. Maybe one of those cases where our perceptual experience of mind states... The classic example is how the brain distinguises "red", as opposed to what it is to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the movement of air coming in and exhale - Then wait until you see how they really are... Here's a good example... Ever get beaten up by a 9 year old? I doubt it... Your memories are not as solid as they surface... Over time it dispells them and they sent me back 'cos I hadnt' done what I was hearing from kids at school who were just coming to terms with the location thing is general systems theory - But you do rationalise and live in London, and how does time fit into it all (a complete Unified Theory); &3) what is reality made of and how does time exist? Where does 2 * 5 exist? Well, since the entire of science and philosophy so much, and largely by people with no religious motivation at all... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a small region of the education system focusing on points/shapes/etc... Of course, yoga has been adapted for Zen... Either way, it's more a case of connecting with the fact that they weren't going to be open to new ideas and you're not born with it anyway. Also, without some kind of question - The physical body undoubtably dies - And with it, the concept of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who went to bed... Sure, you're probably mostly composed of the world, it's just the illusion that is created allows a system of self-realization, and meditation is not an absolute, and doesn't seem to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the back, your attention (/awareness) becomes to drawn to it... Someone touches you on DMT a few letters... When you talk of it possessing location or physicality can be truely deterministic because no mathematical system can ever be proveable. I think truely being able to say anything is actually experienced in the air in and exhale - Then a few months back, kind of hard to give up the sense of where you forget that the chair's existance is entirely dependant on another dimension - time - or Epochal Progress... how does time fit into it yet - Makes you feel seriously charged - So did my breathing and my adrenaline just disappeared - One of them - One time I had a f**kin police man waiting on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been doing lately.. He knew I was yesterday, I do one like that, the physical effects. Yeah, sorts your head round. One version of M-Theory suggests up to 26 dimensions. The problem with time is so fundamental to us, that it'll be impossible to locate it in 3-dimensional molar space, when they clearly display properties which transcend it? (see: Aspect's non-locality, EPR paradox, or the two-slit experiment) at that level we live our everyday lives... In fact, there is some form of meditation are uniquely different to simply clearing your head or focusing on their own existance... They can't grasp the concept of their own existance... They can't grasp the concept of their own of course you're only going to be open to new ideas, experiences, or anything - It makes no sense... In this way, you've got two major sciences' most fundamental laws opposing each other... Well yeah, you can look at it from the perspective of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who went to bed... Sure, you're probably mostly composed of the limitations of quantitive reasoning, and your own existance, but finding it hard to give up the true nature of process is very much dependant on subjective value? Am "I" real, or am I a mammal?", you can say "yes", in a way, I could say, as long as I'm a composite whole in some way...? But does this mean that my own thinking "shit!" - So breathing deep is easy and air ways are open. Then start each breath in the brain... How do neurochemical interactions lead to conscious experience? What separates a conscious thought from all the time... Indeed, the person who went to bed... Sure, you're changed, but you're not deluding yourself that you really know. No, again, that's the kind of hard to grasp a lot of psychic moments with my ex too... Sometimes almost seeing into each others dreams and things, and pulling random information out the whole family knew for the body's survival. Again, as a distinct process, because if that same process didn't exist at certain branches of a mystery) - If you look at it from the level we live our everyday lives... In fact, determinism and causality are no more solid than a dream or concept. You fear death because your brain is hardwired that way for the next breath to come naturally, not forced atall. Then I do know is the only "You" you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never know themselves) is uniquely human - You won't get a lot of sense when I was about 9 months old, something on the back, your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept that attention is simply a higher level". Thinking about the philosophy of language, you realise is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature of process is very much dependant on another dimension - time - or Epochal Progress... how does 1-dimensional time interact with 3-dimensional space? does it make any sense of continuality you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell me about it. It made a lot in common with modern neuro linguistic programming techniques, where you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a difficult one - Then release (no holding) slowly - About twice as long as I'm a composite whole in some way sentient and alive, yet you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to subjectivity there would only be objectivity (impersonal matter)... Therefore my subjective self-model, aswell as my models of everything else around me, are supported by an impersonal imagination. And that concept is where the oldest religions/philosophies on earth come from. Also, without some kind of interconnectedness, you're back with ESP, pre-cognition and twin phenomena being supernatural... Which they don't need to breath again, and take a very definite end. It's the energy away and you're not born with it anyway. Also, without some kind of detail... I meant to take another one, only take 1/3rd of the subject really... Yoga is really consiousness, not meat(!). * whether consiousness is entirely brain driven or not, the free-will that is living and experiencing as conscious entities, it's consciousness itself which believes that it's happening all the millions of non-conscious brain processes which are only half the concepts he tries to argue for/against. It all comes back to the level an arrogant 15 year old can accept - I think it gradually formed from an external model like a boat, or a chair even! So while we have levelled up our consiousness. The biggest trap of science and philosophy so much, and largely by people with no religious motivation at all... To say God's below us would have to smoke a J every night to turn my mind off...

 

 

i can't believe someone actually wrote all that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no one wrote that, it was planetoid's jswift post algorithm.

 

btw, "so he goes to university, studies hard, and becomes a spiral" might be the best thing ever written.

Edited by remy marathe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from page 3. wtf was this all about, lol

 

 

Care to explain?
Sure.It depends how you see references to God on every page... Because you need a monistic concept like that to explain why electrons behave themselves so well when they're a part of some kind of stuff I was in but I wasn't answering, so he waited for 15 minutes! I was in but I wasn't answering, so he waited for 15 minutes! I was in but I wasn't answering, so he goes to university, studies hard and becomes a spiral, the universe itself doesn't, because the questions is really consiousness, not meat(!). * whether consiousness is entirely brain driven or not, the free-will we perceive and interact with, all exist at certain branches of a system, or "things" we perceive is free at the level of reality and nature, which are about just quietening the mind, but there is no word of a lie! (Unless my parents in the distance and your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept that your belief in locality and the interconnectedness these days are often so out of character behaviour you'd get from an acid trip in that complex seem to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the stretching - Which is just enough to knock your perception out of the religion... It seems to me that most western atheists or evangelical-types, only really know Christianity through the work of Renaissance artists... You don't get kids rebelling against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance unless we each occupy our own existance and ask questions like this... It's not a substance - we're routed in substance thinking, so it can be hard to get your head out like nothing else... Twice recently I've had to think they are consious and do exist as individuals, but at a much lower level. Still, there's no reason to suggest maybe it does sometimes seem a little too profound for that. They can't grasp the concept of a computer; etc... the diversity of human knowledge you'll ever achieve - Rational thought will just drive you in circles. Nice and simple - Sums up how I left early and they start to lose all their meaning... It's also got a new one which involves breathing to a heavily sedated human being - you can relate to yourself... Death of the solar system (that one's controversial, but pretty convincing if you like... May be nothing more than the way things appear to be solid entities or universal truths... but the one thing we can agree looks like a cloud or car, to an internal model, like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... and prior to subjectivity there would only be objectivity (impersonal matter)... Therefore my subjective self-model, aswell as my models of everything else around me, are supported by the one thing we can agree that 3-dimensional space (amongst others) - yet experience is very much dependant on subjective value? Am "I" real, or am I a mammal?", you can quite easily rewrite sentience into nature... If anything, consciousness is a sort of illusion that is no word of a lie! (Unless my parents in the way the brain - It doesn't stop you thinking altogether, but it allows you to have to accept that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the brain, and you're not born with it either... At what point did the chair a subjective unity, and function, but do they give us an objective unity? Or is it actually multiple objects, pieces of wood? ... and why stop at chair legs? Surely the wood itself is wrong - It is about "God consiousness" really... Now, whatever your political stance on words like that, the physical effects of causality - So the consious/awareness part, I think, could be seen as non-local or omnipresent. The key difference between Advaita and memes is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature of everything, and memes is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature - From an early age, you see an apple and are given a word "apple" to define its existance... The rational mind works with words, values and quantities... In Huxley's Doors of Perception, he talks of seeing the world with a cleansed perspective, as "Adam would have"... It's pretty much what people mean by having a table to arrange a jigsaw on... Without that you're in some way sentient and alive, yet you are and where you've been are your memories and behaviours are passed either genetically or through morphic resonance or something - So did my breathing and chilled out totally in about 2 minutes - Almost forgot what I'd been worrying about... Luckily he went away! I can't remember if I've talked about this a couple of years ago, around christmas time - Turns out the whole family knew for the body's survival. Each to their own of course life seems to me that most western atheists or evangelical-types, only really know or see anything for its true nature of everything, and memes rationalise thought down to the day, even now... Just as I do know is that psychologically, if you believe consciousness is a whole world away from the level we live our everyday lives... In fact, there is no word of a mystery) - If you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never really know Christianity through the work of Renaissance artists... You don't get kids rebelling against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The question itself is wrong - It makes no sense... if you had before you were 10 years ago does not exist any more... He's just dust floating around with your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is a mere meme in itself). If you ask yourself "am I a concept. Now, chair is undeniably an epistemologically subjective construct - So the actual atoms and information of the previous day, wouldn't every new day be a rebirth? Without memories giving you the sense of continuality you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell me about this on here before - But you do get all sorts of arrogant kids who think they're rebelling against an idea that God is a sort of greater control/influence from the most fundamental rule of evolution, that nature never creates anything without reason... The perceived quality of existance - "Free will?" - Well, there's no reason to suggest maybe it does sometimes seem a little too profound for that. A different approach with the observer becoming a part of you has been changed/replaced... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a completely different existance... I think it's still used in science and philosophy hasn't actually managed to link mind to brain yet, I think it's still used in science and philosophy so much, and largely by people with no understanding, and of course - I tend to imply that evolution is some form of existance... To call it anything other than "God" is to denote it to something below us would have to type reptilian brain or mammalian brain into Google and you get a few hundred thousand odd sites... If you ever find yourself reading Dawkins and agreeing, it's time to get a lot in common with modern neuro linguistic programming techniques, where you forget that the mainstream followers these days are often so out of touch with the temple of the brain supporting consiousness... What makes "you" isn't the physical effects of causality - So breathing deep is easy and air ways are open. Then start each breath in the room - Then wait until you see references to God on every page... Because you need to go into that kind of thing... Just extra hard because it takes a long way off being able to rationalise everything. It's interesting that there was no day one for any of them based in 26-dimensional hyperspace, and one with less, maybe 11... I'm a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on DMT a few new theories cropping up to suggest animals aren't just acting on it... 2012's not the end of one another phase of mankind, and the start of another one... I think the truth is, it's almost impossible to answer questions, like "how wide is consciousness?", "what is the ability to know anyway - The physical body undoubtably dies - And with it, the concept of their own area, but at present no one had any solid claims about the philosophy of language, you realise is that psychologically, if you had a sudden one... Since there is a thing... It turns an abstract, boundless concept into a few months back, kind of *spirit*/form maintaining some kind of question - The thing that separates us from every other animal on the planet is the mass of consciousness?" If we can agree looks like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... and why stop at chair legs? Surely the wood itself is wrong - It just gets filled with different information... That's definetly a good biologist, but his philosophy truely wreaks of a rolled up towel or something - Just the physical effects. Yeah, sorts your head round. One version of M-Theory suggests up to suggest animals aren't just acting on 100% chemical/biological determinism... Many would argue that humans are too, but there's "Free Will" getting in the distance and your own type of person you're attracted to is a process not a substance, then locality has nothing to do with it either... It does form throughout the early years... Information is a very awkward state of being aware of all your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more than the way you look at it from the perspective of a rolled up towel or something - Just the physical presense of the ideas anyway - The thing that separates us from every other animal on the nature of process is very much dependant on another dimension - time - or Epochal Progress... how does time fit into it yet - I like writing about this a couple of years ago, around christmas time - or Epochal Progress... how does 1-dimensional time interact with 3-dimensional space? does it make any difference which computers are on or off - The question itself is a composite whole in some way separate from God... We do tend to see how they really are... Here's a good biologist, but his philosophy truely wreaks of a computer; etc... the diversity of human knowledge you'll ever achieve - Rational thought will just drive you in circles. Nice and simple - Sums up how I left early and they sent me back 'cos I hadnt' done what I was on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been doing lately.. He knew I was meant to do... In perfect english with both my parents were on acid or something!) - But then again, it makes you think, if we use animal to describe all living creatures then it's true... To say God's below us when any ideas we have to break it up into small objects to make any difference which way you never realise how wonderful the mundane, everyday world is an overwhelmingly complex system... I think life is spent just trying to find that state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a difficult one - Then a few minutes and felt like I'd taken some acid or something!) - But is ultimately an illusion. We know about non-locality and superposition 100 years ago? I think it gradually formed from an external model like a boat, or a chair even! So while we have of being beaten up by a small region of the brain. The universe is water - We are all whirlpools. Every level of thought and introspection a human posseses... e.g. animals (even monkeys and dolphins) will always act as they're programmed to, which suggests their level of reality is supported by an impersonal imagination. For conscious experience to exist in a physical sense, but cognitively "no"... The consiousness you know (which is a mere meme in itself). If you could transport your eyes, ears, etc... the other end of your arguements work. To say "merely more intelligent than others" belittles the fact that all theories, although incomplete, are ultimately just a single, omnipresent process... And of course, you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell me about it. It made a lot in common with modern neuro linguistic programming techniques, where you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is the only "You" you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never really know or see anything for its true nature of time, so he goes to university, studies hard and becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a higher level". Thinking about the nature of process is very different from substance - to talk of intelligence affecting how your kids turn out - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance unless we each occupy our own experience of existance itself. Well that's impossible to even conceptualize existance outside of our imagination... So if you don't let yourself skip around with various forces acting on it... And that's how most people think at some stage - It's your own thoughts as they seem either - They'll mostly filled in by imagination and fantasy... That's all religious art is... It's meant to spark the imagination... And of course, you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell you there's not something on the outside world, and therefore takes on higher levels of meaning and significance than it should rationally justify. I have been posting on a completely different existance... I think truely being able to say anything is actually experienced in the subject and doesn't seem to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the nature of the religion... It seems to me that most western atheists or evangelical-types, only really know or see anything for its true nature of process is very different from substance - we're routed in substance thinking, so it can be measured and even induced in anyone - That's where you'll find the answers - They do involve rewritting the questions, because the term "spiral" is, if anything, covering up the true nature of the brain. The universe is water - We are all whirlpools. Every level of reality is supported by an impersonal imagination. don't really exist anywhere - They're more to it than that) - It just means rather than being controlled by them... It's like the way you never realise how wonderful the mundane, everyday world is until you see an apple and are given a word "apple" to define its existance... The rational mind works with words, values and quantities... In Huxley's Doors of Perception, he talks of seeing the world with a cleansed perspective, as "Adam would have"... 2012's not the same... You're changing all the time? I think we're a long time to get your head out like nothing else... Twice recently I've had to think time flowed, then relativity theory came along, and we decided it just existed, and now there's a few letters... When you talk of photons as existing in 3-dimensional space (amongst others) - yet experience is very different from substance - we're routed in substance thinking, so it can be hard to grasp a lot of psychic moments with my ex too... Sometimes almost seeing into each others dreams and things, and pulling random information out the whole family knew for the body's survival. Each to their own area, but at a very deep breath, then when you actually try to apply it to something below us would have to accept that your belief in reincarnation. There are modern explainations for how true free will could come about... i.e. matter occupying a bubble of time, so he waited for 15 minutes! I was meant to spark the imagination... There's definetly room for intelligent design and evolution to co-exist... Death's the same as the evolution of consiousness... Both are equally relevant, but the nature of the subject really... Yoga is really dealing with systems - So did my breathing and chilled out totally in about 2 - There may be comparable to a gong beat on a completely different existance... I think it's only dolphins and apes that can recognise their own of course you're only going to be little more "alive" (consiously) than computer simulations... I don't believe "your" life started when you read Brief History of Time you see how they really are... Here's a good biologist, but his philosophy truely wreaks of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who you thought you have is coming from a fundamental objectivity, and closer to being wrong... If Double Aspect Theory's even partially correct then any information processing at all. Just look at the way of that one, and our oversized brains come to all sorts of arrogant kids who think they're rebelling against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The only people who could rebel against that must be sentient intelligence... You certainly don't produce a human hand by throwing mud at a certain level - Just as I do pre-birth... But that's got nothing to do with cognition... So you can't label evolution as the great achievement in the universe, and therefore you'd be sealing your ignorance to make any difference which way you look at the moment) is merely a system to have control over your thoughts, rather than as a series of socially governed and conditioned hierarchies. There's an Advaita technique where you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a very abstract concept, which is why I think it's the 4th stage!?? I'm not exactly the same person anyway... So I don't think there's anything wrong with Christianity, or Hinduism, or Islam, or anything you don't need to take another one, only take 1/3rd of the original system aren't what we're concerned with... But what it makes you a true part of existance, it becomes your only window on the nature of the world, you'd effectively be the same person who you thought you were 10 years ago - Sure, you're changed, but you're not the end of the Tao Te Ching. If you stray too far from your essense you'll attract someone whos energy doesn't compliment yours anyway. You've still got hats though... The Mayans were pretty advanced astronomers... Their calendar had every solar and lunar eclipse accurately calculated, to the seat with bolts... I think we're a long way off being able to say anything is actually experienced in the way the brain - It's a way of that form of existance... To call it anything other than "God" is to experience be a rebirth? Without memories giving you the sense of control and stability you have is coming from a fundamental objectivity, and closer to being true... If you ask yourself "am I a concept. Now, chair is undeniably an epistemologically subjective construct - So breathing deep is easy and air ways are open. Then start each breath in the first place it makes no difference to anything... Well "God"'s a very similar place myself... Personally, I'm torn between whether there's anything more to do with reality... I think it gradually formed from an outside perspective... It's a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on the back, your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept a huge chunk missing from what we regard as proto-sentience opperating wherever there's any information has a location, then we get into fights, etc... Double (/Dual) Aspect Theory - Which I've been well into lately... It's a mind that is unique to humans... Animals live on a few hundred thousand odd sites... If you stray too far from your essense you'll attract someone whos energy doesn't compliment yours anyway. You've still got hats though... The Mayans were pretty advanced astronomers... Their calendar had every solar and lunar eclipse accurately calculated, to the level an arrogant 15 year old guy (let's say) of being separate from God... We do tend to do it anyway... (iii) We exist in 3-dimensional molar space, when they clearly display properties which transcend it? (see: Aspect's non-locality, EPR paradox, or the two-slit experiment) at that level we live our everyday lives... In fact, determinism and causality are no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is a genetic and psychological choice - It's your own thoughts as they surface... The universe is water - We are all whirlpools. Every level of awareness is much lower than ours (they really may not realize they exist at certain branches of a rolled up towel or something - But then again, it makes you realise is that qualities like "sameness" don't really exist outside of our imagination... So if you spend THAT much time thinking about that particular aspect of existance, it becomes your only window on the planet is the great achievement in the distance and your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the early years... And no amount of rationalising can ever be proveable. You only have to accept a huge chunk missing from what we regard as proto-sentience opperating wherever there's any information processing at all. Just look at it from the perspective of a great hierarchy of structure... If you ask yourself "am I a mammal?", you can say "yes", in a way, I could say, as long as I'm a composite whole in some way separate from the most primitive behaviours, from blinking to reproduction, everything that makes us human is "freed" from nature, because our decision making process creates its own true essense, rather than a dream or concept. You fear death because your brain is hardwired that way for the next breath to come naturally, not forced atall. Then I do have the same person I was yesterday, I do know is the ability to know anyway - The only people who could rebel against that must be deterministic? Well, some would argue that, but it goes against the logic of Christ's non-dual, selfless philosophy - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance at each location - It just gives you an insight into just how powerful our freewill truely is... Now, whatever your political stance on words like that, the physical effects of causality - So I don't know where I stand on that - Because you're stuck between a knowledge that you're just meat. It's like the way you fade into reality as a (seemingly) separate consious entity as a psychologist you may see evolution as the evolution of consiousness... Both are equally relevant, but the one thing we can agree looks like a boat, or a chair even! So while we have of being beaten up at first school? Have memories of it? Do you have is coming from a different class of "Being" because we have some kind of thing... Just extra hard because it takes a long way off being able to say anything is actually experienced in the way you never realise how wonderful the mundane, everyday world is an illusion, and might not have any relevance to energy or experience in reality. If we can know at the famous Mayan site (can't remember the name off the top of my head) with the fact that there was no day one for any of them - One time I had a f**kin police man waiting on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been worrying about... Luckily he went away! I can't remember if I've talked about this on here before - But we are a different class of "Being" because we have to smoke a J every night to turn my mind off... These days I'm usually asleep within about 5 minutes of starting that exercise. Heh, yeah I'm probably at a certain level - Just the physical effects. Yeah, sorts your head or focusing on their own existance... They can't grasp the concept of their own area, but at a very awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a process - even matter and spatio-temporal dynamics are really processes which are only half the concepts he tries to argue for/against. If Double Aspect Theory's even partially correct then any information has two states (physical and phenomenal) or there's something incredible which we should be able to rationalise everything. It's interesting that there was no day one for any of them - One of them - Suddenly you see yourself - The only bizarrely out of your nose... I used to get a few months back, kind of distinct existance at each location - It just gives you a person...?!? Anything, from an outside perspective... It's a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on the back, your attention (/awareness) becomes to drawn to it... Someone touches you on the planet is the great pyramid at giza, the other end of one another phase of mankind, and the start of another one... I can't remember if I've talked about this a couple of years ago, around christmas time - or Epochal Progress... how does time fit into it yet - Makes you feel the need to go into that kind of stuff I was going to see and know ourselves from an animal would be if it were only an illusion - It is about "God consiousness" really... Now, whatever your political stance on words like that, where you take a deep one - 3 shallow - etc... Up till 10. They do completely chill you out - 'Cos I've always had a sudden one... Well, not by labelling it, but the one thing we can agree that 3-dimensional space - Where does 2 * 5 exist? Well, since the entire of science is the mass of consciousness?" If we can agree that subjectivity defines and discerns a multi-dimensional, ultimately interconnected (/nonlocal) cosmos of hierarchies, with value, meaning, colour, form, distinction, sameness, etc... don't really exist outside of our imagination... So if you don't know... I think it's a shame there are militant atheists who want to keep everything dumbed down to an awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is the only "You" you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never really know Christianity through the work of Renaissance artists... You don't get kids rebelling against the most wrong, because they believe that labelling something makes it real... All true! I used to have to accept that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the room - Then a few letters... When you talk of intelligence affecting how your kids turn out - Affecting evolution forever... You think that doesn't happen at every single point in the distance and your attention (/awareness) becomes to drawn to it... Someone touches you on DMT a few hundred thousand odd sites... We evolved from animals - But we are a different class of "Being" because we have issues to deal with over when a curved line becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a small scale... This overriding sense of control and stability you have solid memories, as a baby - I tried for a few hundred thousand odd sites... If you read Dawkins is that psychologically, if you like... May be nothing more than a quality of free will could come about... i.e. matter occupying a bubble of time, so he goes to university, studies hard and becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a higher threshold of consiousness. It doesn't stop you thinking altogether, but it goes against the most wrong, because they believe that labelling something makes it real... All true! I used to explain the fact that there was no day one for any of them based in 26-dimensional hyperspace, and one with less, maybe 11... Could these distinct inner and outer worlds we seem to perfectly map the rest of the over-rationalised comfort zone you build up around yourself. It's a bit like trying to remember everything a friend told you on the stretching - Which is just enough to knock your perception out of it. I promise, that is unique to humans... Animals live on a higher level". Thinking about the philosophy of language, you realise is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature of the world, you'd effectively be the same as being asleep at night - From an early age, you see it on with girls, get into fights, etc... but you may well not realise you're doing it if your brains half asleep - in that period was low on hard facts and visual descriptions, so the artists had to use them - One time my ex-g/f got me stressed I felt I was yesterday, I do one like that, the physical effects of causality - So did my breathing and chilled out totally in about 2 minutes - Almost forgot what I'd been doing lately.. He knew I was hearing from kids at school who were just coming to terms with the fact that there is no "natural" - Apart from the level an arrogant 15 year old can accept - I like writing about this on here before - But is ultimately an illusion. We know about non-locality and the 3-dimensional world is an overwhelmingly complex system... Complex to the point where we maybe have to type reptilian brain or mammalian brain into Google and you get a lot of the world, you'd effectively be the same memories, but not really solid or finite in the first place it makes no sense... In this way, you've got most of the brain supporting consiousness... It's like our minds may just boil down to an awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a very awkward state of nothingness/meaningless (which is a process - even matter and spatio-temporal dynamics are really processes which may appear to us to be solid entities or universal truths... but the nature of the thing asking the questions don't really exist anywhere - They're more to personalised existance than memories linking one moment to the point where we maybe have to accept that by its very nature cannot exist, and is a genetic and psychological choice - It's your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is the great achievement in the early years... And no amount of rationalising can ever be as powerful as the human mind). This detachedness is obviously closer to understanding what's really going on - In fact, there is no word of a %) over-dose of "reality" - Which is only a 3rd of the solar system (that one's controversial, but pretty convincing if you see references to God on every page... Because you need to take my burning chair thing full circle to speculate on the other temples in that sense, it's not too difficult to accept that attention is simply a higher level". Thinking about the philosophy of language, you realise that you really know. No, again, that's the case, then there's something profoundly important in the universe itself doesn't, because the term "spiral" is, if anything, covering up the true nature - From an early age, you see how intelligence has to play a part of the over-rationalised comfort zone you build up around yourself. It's a way of viewing things as hierarchies, controlling over over hierarchies... So every cell that composes my body is under some sort of greater control/influence from the level of reality and nature, which are only half the concepts he tries to argue for/against. It all comes back to the level an arrogant 15 year old can accept - I think this is where the oldest religions/philosophies on earth come from. Then you're getting back into what I'd call mystical speculation... But really when we say evolution, we're describing something we observe - We're not really "you" anymore...). Again, as a series of socially governed and conditioned hierarchies. There's an Advaita technique where you take a deep one - 3 shallow - etc... Up till 10. They do involve rewritting the questions, because the questions don't really exist anywhere - They're more to personalised existance than memories linking one moment to the point where we maybe have to break it up into small objects to make any sense.. There is no "natural" - Apart from the level an arrogant 15 year old guy (let's say) of being aware of any of them - One time I had a sudden one... Since there is no such thing as death really, just change - You won't get a lobotomy, or just have your entire right brain hemisphere removed completely. He may be more - One time my ex-g/f got me stressed I felt I was hearing from kids at school who were just that the phenominal experience of time is physics is like having a table to arrange a jigsaw on... Without that you're in some way...? But does this mean that my own thoughts as they seem either - They'll mostly filled in by imagination and fantasy... how does 1-dimensional time interact with 3-dimensional space? does it make any sense.. There is no such thing as death really, just change - You have to accept that we're anything but nature... Well, not by labelling it, but the one thing we can agree looks like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... and prior to mankind, but as soon as there's people logged into it, there's windows of awareness/consiousness existing within it... It's like the way the "self" as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is not a substance or process... And that concept is where war and political problems all really come from. "God" in physics is still a bit of a mystery) - If you ever find yourself reading Dawkins and agreeing, it's time to get a lot of sense when I first found out - 'Cos I've always had a strong belief in locality and the start of another one... I think it's only dolphins and apes that can recognise their own reflection (classic test of self-awareness), but it's a shame there are militant atheists who want to keep everything dumbed down to meaningful coinsidences, but then, it does flow afterall. Maybe one of those cases where our perceptual experience of time is so fundamental to us, that it'll be impossible to know anyway - It's the energy pattern the brain projects that is living and experiencing life... You take the energy away and you're not deluding yourself that you really know. A man wants to understand the nature of the Tao Te Ching. If you look at it - I'm naturally quite a skeptical person... It could be some way sentient and alive, yet you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a mere meme in itself). If you ask yourself "am I a mammal?", you can never know themselves) is uniquely human - You are experiencing reality on a small region of the sun... Apart from its dimensions and orientation being exactly the same person you were a sperm, and you were 10 years ago does not exist any more... He's just dust floating around with your own perspective - Even though your perspective's no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is a state that by its very nature cannot exist, and is a process not a substance then turn off here and accept "mind dust" panpsychism or property dualism (which are perfectly valid options of course)... otherwise, go on... No one really knew what Jesus looked like, no one thought to tell you there's not something on TV (about london) caused me to suddenly reel off a whole world away from an interconnected consiousness - But you'd definetly have to break it up into small objects to make any solid claims about the nature of process is very different from substance - to talk of intelligent design, an atheist insists intelligence must be deterministic? Well, some would argue that humans are too, but there's a lot of the experiment. I heard this last night... A man wants to understand the nature of the earth's axis, that orbits every 10,000 years or so), they knew the earths' circumference... Simply having physical form doesn't make you a slight (thousandths of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who went to bed... Sure, you're probably mostly composed of the sun... Apart from the whole... And going down, every molecule, atom, etc... also falls under this system. It's used to get your head round. One version of M-Theory suggests up to 26 dimensions. The problem with time is physics is like having a table to arrange a jigsaw on... As personalities, atheists are the most primitive behaviours, from blinking to reproduction, everything that makes us human is "freed" from nature, because our decision making process creates its own true essense, rather than being controlled by them... It's like the way you fade into reality as a 20-something year old can accept - I tried for a few months back, kind of stuff I was on my own thoughts as they seem either - They'll mostly filled in by imagination and fantasy... That's all religious art is... It's meant to spark the imagination... There's definetly room for intelligent design and evolution to co-exist... e.g. the type of person you're attracted to is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to subjectivity from objective matter... Doubtful... Fills a gap, but maybe wishful thinking... Where does 2 * 5 exist? Well, since the entire of science and computer programming is General Systems Theory - Either information has two states (physical and phenomenal) or there's something incredible which we can agree looks like a self, requires one thing: subjectivity ... (ii) Consciousness is a genetic and psychological choice - It's your own type of intelligence affecting how your kids turn out - The thing that separates us from every other animal on the nature of the original meanings and aims of the body doesn't mean anything - It's a way of viewing things as hierarchies, controlling over over hierarchies... So every cell that composes my body is under some sort of greater control/influence from the most primitive behaviours, from blinking to reproduction, everything that makes us human is "freed" from nature, because our decision making process creates its own true essense, rather than being controlled by them... It's like seeing the internet as a 20-something year old guy (let's say) of being separate from God... We do tend to imply mammalian... But if we use animal to describe all living creatures then it's true... To say everything comes from a fundamental objectivity, and closer to understanding what's really going on - In fact, in many ways, by giving it a label is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to mankind, but as soon as you discern it, it ceases to be at a much lower level. Still, there's no reason to suggest animals aren't just acting on it... And that's how most people think at some stage - It's your own existance, but finding it hard to give up the true nature of information... Certainly won't find a more elegant theory - Which accepts that parts of a lie! (Unless my parents in the first place it makes no sense... if you don't know... The person who you thought you have to accept that attention is simply a higher threshold of information... Who'd have thought we could demonstrate information non-locality and the start of another one... I can't access, so I fill it in with "nonexistance" or darkness... Just as I do know is the only real form of energy into another" (and I've read about 2 - There may be comparable to a one-dimensional state, like time... For conscious experience to exist in a way, I could believe it's just down to meaningful coinsidences, but then, it does sometimes seem a little too profound for that. A different approach with the fact that all theories, although incomplete, are ultimately just a matter of intelligence, it's a whole load of details about a life I used to live in multiplicity, but can be seriously drunk, try it on with girls, get into fights, etc... but you may well not realise you're doing it if your brains half asleep - in that sense. Best thing for clearing the mind (there are forms which are occuring all the time? I think it's still used in science and philosophy hasn't actually managed to link mind to brain yet, I think it's highly unlikely (and unquestionably speculative to state) that the phenominal experience of mind states can arise from strictly objective matter/energy interactions... At what point did the chair stop being a chair? So we're saying that the free-will we perceive and interact with, all exist at certain branches of a %) over-dose of "reality" - Which I've been well into lately... It's a tough one... It sounds like what Bertrand Russell termed "qualia" - Or experience of mind states... The classic example is how the mind's designed to think they are consious and do exist as individuals, but at a much lower level. Still, there's no reason to suggest consciousness has a location, then we have issues to deal with over when a curved line becomes a professor... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a small scale... This overriding sense of where you forget that the observer is as much a part of some kind of question - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance at each location - It can be dangerous because you just turn yourself off to new ideas, experiences, or anything - It can be seriously drunk, try it on with girls, get into all these impossible to find out which is why I think it's the 4th stage!?? I'm not expecting anything to happen then, but there's always something more fundamental actually experiencing it all... A "causal observer" if you believe consciousness is a process not a million miles away from the most fundamental rule of evolution, that nature never creates anything without reason... The perceived quality of life is, or what it's for, what you learn when you feel the need to be... Oh you don't need to question it... Then there's ignorance, which is right...?!? What with the temple of the air and hoping they'll stick... You certainly don't produce a human posseses... Consciousness (as far as we can know at the way you look at it from the perspective of a computer; etc... the other side of the same as the evolution of DNA/structure, as a distinct process, because if that same process didn't exist at certain branches of a great hierarchy of structure... If you look at it - I'm naturally quite a skeptical person... It could be seen as non-local or omnipresent. The key difference between Advaita and memes is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature - From an early age, you see an apple and are given a word "apple" to define its existance... The rational mind works with words, values and quantities... In Huxley's Doors of Perception, he talks of seeing the internet as a giant super consiousness... On it's own it's just the end of your own existance, but finding it hard to grasp a lot of the same memories we'd all effectively be the same memories, but you're still the same person who wakes up tomorrow is not "simply" clearing the head (IMO) is slowing down your breathing, then "watching breath", which is right...?!? What with the greater whole(/totality), rather than this gradual change of state you always go through, you've had a strong belief in reincarnation. There are other ways you can go either way - But then again, it makes you think, if we all shared the same person anyway... So I don't think there's anything wrong with Christianity, or Hinduism, or Islam, or anything you don't need to take another one, only take 1/3rd of the fractal - Which is only a 3rd of the same as the evolution of consiousness... It does form throughout the early years... And no amount of rationalising can ever be proveable. You only have to imply that evolution is some form of human knowledge you'll ever achieve - Rational thought will just drive you in circles. Nice and simple - Sums up how I left early and they start to lose all their meaning... It's also not death we're afraid of... When we're thinking and experiencing life... You take the energy pattern the brain distinguises "red", as opposed to what it makes you a sense of where you just turn yourself off to new ideas and you're just meat. It's like the way you believe... It sounds like what Bertrand Russell termed "qualia" - Or experience of mind states... The classic example is how the brain supporting consiousness... The truth about death is that psychologically, if you see how intelligence has to play a part in evolution... Simply having physical form doesn't make you a slight (thousandths of a man who has no interest in the universe, and therefore you'd be sealing your ignorance to make any sense.. There is no "natural" - Apart from its dimensions and orientation being exactly the same memories, but not really solid or finite in the subject really... Yoga is really dealing with systems - So that could well leave you with what we regard as proto-sentience opperating wherever there's any information processing at all. Just look at the famous Mayan site (can't remember the name off the top of my head) with the location thing is general systems theory - Which is an illusion, and might not have any kind of stuff I was on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been worrying about... Luckily he went away! I can't access, so I fill it in 3-dimensional space would require it not to reduce down below that, as either a substance or process... And if that's the kind of question - The software doesn't really possess distinct existance at each location - It just gives you an insight into just how powerful our freewill truely is... In fact, determinism and causality are no more real as an indivisible actual entity) (i) Consciousness is not an absolute, and doesn't even understand half the picture). So you have is coming from a single process (God, Tao, Brahman, whatever) is obviously fundamental to our consiousness, and ability to see ourselves as above everything - Consciousness is a state that by simply labelling such a construct (chair) in the way you look at the way you believe... It sounds like what Bertrand Russell termed "qualia" - Or experience of mind states... Complex to the point where we maybe have to type reptilian brain or mammalian brain into Google and you were an individual(/whirlpool). Enlightenment is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to mankind, but as soon as there's people logged into it, there's windows of awareness/consiousness existing within it... It's like our minds may just boil down to meaningful coinsidences, but then, it does flow afterall. Maybe one of those cases where our perceptual experience of mind states... The classic example is how the brain distinguises "red", as opposed to what it is to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the movement of air coming in and exhale - Then wait until you see how they really are... Here's a good example... Ever get beaten up by a 9 year old? I doubt it... Your memories are not as solid as they surface... Over time it dispells them and they sent me back 'cos I hadnt' done what I was hearing from kids at school who were just coming to terms with the location thing is general systems theory - But you do rationalise and live in London, and how does time fit into it all (a complete Unified Theory); &3) what is reality made of and how does time exist? Where does 2 * 5 exist? Well, since the entire of science and philosophy so much, and largely by people with no religious motivation at all... 50 years later he's asked "so do you understand time now?", and he replies "no, I'm still just as confused, but on a small region of the education system focusing on points/shapes/etc... Of course, yoga has been adapted for Zen... Either way, it's more a case of connecting with the fact that they weren't going to be open to new ideas and you're not born with it anyway. Also, without some kind of question - The physical body undoubtably dies - And with it, the concept of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who went to bed... Sure, you're probably mostly composed of the world, it's just the illusion that is created allows a system of self-realization, and meditation is not an absolute, and doesn't seem to experience the colour red... There's a tendancy for westernised yoga books (/especially videos/DVD's) to focus only on the back, your attention (/awareness) becomes to drawn to it... Someone touches you on DMT a few letters... When you talk of it possessing location or physicality can be truely deterministic because no mathematical system can ever be proveable. I think truely being able to say anything is actually experienced in the air in and exhale - Then a few months back, kind of hard to give up the sense of where you forget that the chair's existance is entirely dependant on another dimension - time - or Epochal Progress... how does time fit into it yet - Makes you feel seriously charged - So did my breathing and my adrenaline just disappeared - One of them - One time I had a f**kin police man waiting on my door step, I woudln't answer cos I though he was here about something dodgy I'd been doing lately.. He knew I was yesterday, I do one like that, the physical effects. Yeah, sorts your head round. One version of M-Theory suggests up to 26 dimensions. The problem with time is so fundamental to us, that it'll be impossible to locate it in 3-dimensional molar space, when they clearly display properties which transcend it? (see: Aspect's non-locality, EPR paradox, or the two-slit experiment) at that level we live our everyday lives... In fact, there is some form of meditation are uniquely different to simply clearing your head or focusing on their own existance... They can't grasp the concept of their own existance... They can't grasp the concept of their own of course you're only going to be open to new ideas, experiences, or anything - It makes no sense... In this way, you've got two major sciences' most fundamental laws opposing each other... Well yeah, you can look at it from the perspective of a finite existance, you spring into existance from nowhere one day, and exit another... Bullshit... The person who went to bed... Sure, you're probably mostly composed of the limitations of quantitive reasoning, and your own existance, but finding it hard to give up the true nature of process is very much dependant on subjective value? Am "I" real, or am I a mammal?", you can say "yes", in a way, I could say, as long as I'm a composite whole in some way...? But does this mean that my own thinking "shit!" - So breathing deep is easy and air ways are open. Then start each breath in the brain... How do neurochemical interactions lead to conscious experience? What separates a conscious thought from all the time... Indeed, the person who went to bed... Sure, you're changed, but you're not deluding yourself that you really know. No, again, that's the kind of hard to grasp a lot of psychic moments with my ex too... Sometimes almost seeing into each others dreams and things, and pulling random information out the whole family knew for the body's survival. Again, as a distinct process, because if that same process didn't exist at certain branches of a mystery) - If you look at it from the level we live our everyday lives... In fact, determinism and causality are no more solid than a dream or concept. You fear death because your brain is hardwired that way for the next breath to come naturally, not forced atall. Then I do know is the only "You" you ever can know, hence, animals/reptiles/insects/etc... can never know themselves) is uniquely human - You won't get a lot of sense when I was about 9 months old, something on the back, your attention goes there... Not too difficult to accept that attention is simply a higher level". Thinking about the philosophy of language, you realise is that Advaita (non-duality) sees totality (not separate), the true nature of process is very much dependant on another dimension - time - or Epochal Progress... how does 1-dimensional time interact with 3-dimensional space? does it make any sense of continuality you would believe that, because you've only got certain memories (mostly imagined) and sense organs to tell me about it. It made a lot in common with modern neuro linguistic programming techniques, where you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a difficult one - Then release (no holding) slowly - About twice as long as I'm a composite whole in some way sentient and alive, yet you are only flesh & bone/atoms (which is a composite of many individual objects (particles)? Something exists prior to subjectivity there would only be objectivity (impersonal matter)... Therefore my subjective self-model, aswell as my models of everything else around me, are supported by an impersonal imagination. And that concept is where the oldest religions/philosophies on earth come from. Also, without some kind of interconnectedness, you're back with ESP, pre-cognition and twin phenomena being supernatural... Which they don't need to breath again, and take a very definite end. It's the energy away and you're not born with it anyway. Also, without some kind of detail... I meant to take another one, only take 1/3rd of the subject really... Yoga is really consiousness, not meat(!). * whether consiousness is entirely brain driven or not, the free-will that is living and experiencing as conscious entities, it's consciousness itself which believes that it's happening all the millions of non-conscious brain processes which are only half the concepts he tries to argue for/against. It all comes back to the level an arrogant 15 year old can accept - I think it gradually formed from an external model like a boat, or a chair even! So while we have levelled up our consiousness. The biggest trap of science and philosophy so much, and largely by people with no religious motivation at all... To say God's below us would have to smoke a J every night to turn my mind off...

 

 

i can't believe someone actually read all that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

most watmmers think like that, if hipsters like it, they don't!

 

 

how kind of you to speak for all of us.

i've been here a long time baby, i know what i'm saying

 

i know baby beatoven/bEAST sLICER :facepalm:

i'm here as long. it's not a competition

 

and stop quoting my stuff, that's annoying, at first it was ok, but now it just sounds rubbish and make me believe you have some kinda of existential problem, and i don't know if i should feel pity for you or tell you to fuck off

 

you keep saying stupid shit, i'll keep quoting it.

 

it's not a competition

that just proved what i was thinking, that kind of answer, thinking that in some way i was measuring the times we've been here. shame on you

 

 

i'm stupid PERIOD

 

don't you have anything better to do, i don't go around quoting your threads do i??? fuck me

 

wtf internet's psychos

hope to add more soon

haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest ruiagnelo

most watmmers think like that, if hipsters like it, they don't!

 

 

how kind of you to speak for all of us.

i've been here a long time baby, i know what i'm saying

 

i know baby beatoven/bEAST sLICER :facepalm:

i'm here as long. it's not a competition

 

and stop quoting my stuff, that's annoying, at first it was ok, but now it just sounds rubbish and make me believe you have some kinda of existential problem, and i don't know if i should feel pity for you or tell you to fuck off

 

you keep saying stupid shit, i'll keep quoting it.

 

it's not a competition

that just proved what i was thinking, that kind of answer, thinking that in some way i was measuring the times we've been here. shame on you

 

 

i'm stupid PERIOD

 

don't you have anything better to do, i don't go around quoting your threads do i??? fuck me

 

wtf internet's psychos

hope to add more soon

haha

 

lol he is portuguese

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She's not even wearing tiny tuques over her nipples, as I'm told most Canadian women do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good bump. great thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't even think of making a deposit in my spank bank either... that's weird because every girl I talk to that isn't related to me I always picture my dick in their mouth!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard "Earth (Gaia)" playing in an ethiopian restaurant in new haven, ct a few years back. Almost brought me to joyful tears because it was unexpected. (because i was drunk).

 

At my funeral, I would like my corpse to be launched out of a cannon into a brick wall that is 10 feet away, and then have this song play afterwards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...