modey Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 variable data! what are you using? directsmile? xmpie? yours truly? i'm interested! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Clitterhaus Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 if someone wants to pm me this, that'd be cool. I like it quite a bit. why do people keep saying this? are you really that poor that you can't afford a couple of dollars for a track? I'm made out of mold. This retort encapsulates the limitations of the n00b. An epic fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcbpete Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 (edited) somebody pls send me the Quaristice.Quadrange.ep.ae thx don't be a fucking cheapskate thx this track is ace by the way. Edited May 31, 2008 by mcbpete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBLA Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 variable data! what are you using? directsmile? xmpie? yours truly? i'm interested! ummm... indesign and darwin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modey Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 oh! i didn't know darwin was indesign based now.. i guess they had to change from quark so they wouldn't go out of business heheh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBLA Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 oh! i didn't know darwin was indesign based now.. i guess they had to change from quark so they wouldn't go out of business heheh. yeah... that's the only way i know it... i've only been doing this for about 2 months now... i was bored one day caught up with work and the dude that normally does it was backed up and needed help... so i kinda taught myself how to do it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modey Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 (edited) i just learned directsmile, it's a pretty awesome program. variable imagery and such. my favourite demo image is the slightly underaged looking girl in a bath writing a person's name in the bubbles: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « you can even see a nipple if you look hard enough! Edited May 31, 2008 by modey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest maldoror Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 variable data! what are you using? directsmile? xmpie? yours truly? i'm interested! everytime i see your icon, i get momentarily confused, trying to decide if it's peter gabriel or peter christopherson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nsixqatsi Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 if someone wants to pm me this, that'd be cool. I like it quite a bit. why do people keep saying this? are you really that poor that you can't afford a couple of dollars for a track? I'm made out of mold. This retort encapsulates the limitations of the n00b. An epic fail. boo hoo new person joins forum mostly so he can occasionaly get something new pmed to him for the easy. maybe i should READ THE RULES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lianne Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 (edited) There's something a bit rough and ugly sounding about this track that makes it hard to enjoy. I'm not talking about deliberate darkness, like in Confield. It's something irritating. Edited May 31, 2008 by Lianne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hanratty Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 How long is this track? I love the "slowed-down Basic Channel" comparison. Really curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LCC Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 How long is this track? I love the "slowed-down Basic Channel" comparison. Really curious. 58:35 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jules Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 id be curious to hear what people thought of this if the exact track was released by say, chris clark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lianne Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 id be curious to hear what people thought of this if the exact track was released by say, chris clark. Same here. Much as I've loved a lot of Autechre's music, I do reckon if Clark put that track out everyone would rip it to shreds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehauntingsoul Posted June 3, 2008 Author Share Posted June 3, 2008 I listened to this track in its entirety whilst tripping on shrooms this weekend and I've got to say it was really deep, absolutely mind-blowing experience:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goonstock Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 i've yet to listen to more than one minute of this track maybe i will now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amnesia Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 I listened to this track in its entirety whilst tripping on shrooms this weekend and I've got to say it was really deep, absolutely mind-blowing experience:) IM SURE ANY MUSIC ON MUSHROOMS IS AMAZING...MEAT BEAT MANIFESTOS 99% WILL ALWAYS BE MY FAV MUSHROOM MUSIC AND THE PSYCHIC WARRIORS OV GAIA ALBUM :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sysyphus Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 this track is the timeline of every living organism on this planet - from birth and life to death and silence....muy bien Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest November Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 The Subrange sets, Losid 2 and Suns versions were all more enjoyable for me than the Range set and Perlence itself, which I felt were kinda throwaways to begin with. My only issue with Subrange 6-36 is the clipping-like reverb on some of the bass hits are too jarring to truly feel like it has a purpose there. Otherwise, it's an average at best ambient track and I don't mind it. Altibzz/Altichyre and the Notwo/Nofour sets more than make up for it. If they won't do a 'studio live' album, I can only hope they do a more ambient album along those lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lianne Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 The Subrange sets, Losid 2 and Suns versions were all more enjoyable for me than the Range set and Perlence itself, which I felt were kinda throwaways to begin with. My only issue with Subrange 6-36 is the clipping-like reverb on some of the bass hits are too jarring to truly feel like it has a purpose there. Otherwise, it's an average at best ambient track and I don't mind it. Altibzz/Altichyre and the Notwo/Nofour sets more than make up for it. If they won't do a 'studio live' album, I can only hope they do a more ambient album along those lines. Ah, that's what it was. I thought there was something wrong with my brand new headphones! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest QkThr Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 ..And I don't want to get high in order to enjoy it! LOL, a flushing toilet sounds cool when you're stoned. Plus, that would make it a really expensive track if you had to go score each time you listened. Bleep should put "Suggested Retail Price 50 Euros as You're Gonna Need Some Skunk for this One." :laughing: exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awepittance Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 I listened to this track in its entirety whilst tripping on shrooms this weekend and I've got to say it was really deep, absolutely mind-blowing experience:) you need better drug music. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Super lurker ultra V12 Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 id be curious to hear what people thought of this if the exact track was released by say, chris clark. Same here. Much as I've loved a lot of Autechre's music, I do reckon if Clark put that track out everyone would rip it to shreds. I don't care who released this, it sucks There are a lot of experimental artists who have released better ambient tracks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest moo duck Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 i think clipping-like effect is what makes this track on its front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Dylan Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Anybody tried to compress the time by 0.1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now