karmakramer Posted October 9, 2009 Author Share Posted October 9, 2009 Clark is famous for his already "compressed" tunes. These are two completely different kinds of compression. True, my point was mostly that because Clark's music is so distorted/complex, listening to it at a low-bitrates (compressed), would especially not be advised. That still doesn't make any sense. but anyways, isn't vbr theoretically just as good as cbr? Is it? I honestly don't know much on the technical side, but just assumed constant quality is better then one that varies... Not worth the extra mb though in all honestly. especially not in a mix. How much space can/will it save do you think? I just tried making a VBR MP3 in iTunes... and I must be doing something wrong but I set the settings at Medium High for the VBR and the file size still came out the same as the CBR MP3... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneaksta303 Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 key words (or word?) there - "iTunes" try a free audio editor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karmakramer Posted October 10, 2009 Author Share Posted October 10, 2009 key words (or word?) there - "iTunes" try a free audio editor Alright, iTunes seems to be a good converter most of the time for me, but I'll use something else. Do you still want a VBR version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneaksta303 Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 key words (or word?) there - "iTunes" try a free audio editor Alright, iTunes seems to be a good converter most of the time for me, but I'll use something else. Do you still want a VBR version? don't worry about it, I'll just get this one. BUT, in the future, if I were you I'd just do a relatively HQ VBR version instead of 320. For mixes there isn't really a reason to go any higher. This is just 1 man's opinion though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spptrl alt del Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 pretty rough transition between Look Into the Heart Now and Vengeance Drools. nice mix though, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayhook Posted November 18, 2009 Share Posted November 18, 2009 can you reup? I would love to hear this.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chim Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Really good stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karmakramer Posted November 23, 2009 Author Share Posted November 23, 2009 new upload - http://www.mediafire.com/?mymonmnheii Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Excellent on the download now, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayhook Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 new upload - http://www.mediafire.com/?mymonmnheii great mix man thanks have been digging it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bigs Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 download's gone again........ and high quality vbr should sound *essentially* the same as a 320KB/s CBR. the idea is variable bit rate means it devotes more bits towards representing some samples of music when those samples are more complex (less easily represented in some generalizing form) and less when there are a fewer sounds, etc. this way, on average, VBR and CBR are losing basically the same amount of information, though VBR is better compressed. it's pretty good times, i'm a fan of VBR. anywho, i'd love to hear this mix! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karmakramer Posted December 5, 2009 Author Share Posted December 5, 2009 download's gone again........ and high quality vbr should sound *essentially* the same as a 320KB/s CBR. the idea is variable bit rate means it devotes more bits towards representing some samples of music when those samples are more complex (less easily represented in some generalizing form) and less when there are a fewer sounds, etc. this way, on average, VBR and CBR are losing basically the same amount of information, though VBR is better compressed. it's pretty good times, i'm a fan of VBR. anywho, i'd love to hear this mix! woah weird... well I'll tell you what, after re-listening to this mix I've decided its really not good enough... so I am going to another one this weekend and will post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Man you deserve to be granted a spare set of balls for when your ones wear out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Otto Krat Posted December 13, 2009 Share Posted December 13, 2009 can you reup? I would love to hear this.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abreaktor Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 awesome mix. thanks man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tokn Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Please re-upload Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karmakramer Posted January 30, 2010 Author Share Posted January 30, 2010 Please re-upload http://soundcloud.com/analoguerevolver/chris-clark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.