chassis Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I noticed this in my collection a while back. I downloaded Hangable Auto Bulb and then I bought it some time later. But then I forgot which copy was the cd burn and which was the download, but to be honest I wasnt arsed checking it out. But Ive found videos on youtube to the same effect. If you care to look at the 2 videos, just the beginning of each is enough to tell the difference between them. One starts of distinctly flatter than the other. So which one is the one Richy intended? Which one do you prefer? I presume this came out by people ripping the vinyl at different speeds. Personally I prefer the one with the more minor texture. Fast one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mazNV3wTpyY Slower one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pzTGolXgS0 Yeah this could be Jazz but I couldn't be arse searching because the forum search doesnt work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubbhasdance Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I believe the slower one is the one he intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chassis Posted August 14, 2010 Author Share Posted August 14, 2010 The fast one seems a but rushed alright. Fuckin' turntable noobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubbhasdance Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Wait, now that I actually listen to the tracks, I believe it's the fast one, lol. Sounds just like the version on my computer. Anyone can confirm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBLA Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 the fast one is on the cd that i bought a few years ago... i too have a ripped version that someone gave me and it was slower than that other sample you posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chassis Posted August 14, 2010 Author Share Posted August 14, 2010 Thats a pity bubbha because I think the slower one there is much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rabid Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Never really liked this track but the slow version is pretty good... quite good, even... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Calx Sherbet Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 slower one sounds right. i'm positive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azatoth Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I think the faster sounds more right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcbpete Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 It's the one at the top (matchings the timing to the CD release I have - though why they included 1 minutes worth of silence is a mystery). Though the bottom one I'm guessing is just slowed down slightly via the turntable speed slider thing rather than being played at 33 when it should be 45 as there's only a few seconds difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Billov Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Yip its the faster one, I have the CD too... I've always thought this sounded like an idm bagpipes jam put through a wah pedal... fucking love it :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elusive4 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 always bet on faster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goDel Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 idm is like betting on horses. the most drug-driven always wins! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosmachine Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 this is my favorite rdj track. fast one sounds right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markedone Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Yeah it's definitely the fast[er] one. I have the CD release and having heard that version for years, the "slow version" sounds proper lethargic. Sure the wails sound cool slowed down but the drums don't have nearly the same tightly-programmed effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Calx Sherbet Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 wow, i've been so blind all these years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chassis Posted August 14, 2010 Author Share Posted August 14, 2010 I think I'll keep my slower version. Sounds better in my eyes(ears). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hahathhat Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 how funny. i had just put on HAB yesterday and was getting seriously into this track for the first time in ages, now today there is a two-page thread here edit: to be on topic, my pirated mp3 is faster version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thief Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 heat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cern Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 "Every Day" is also Tempo fucked. But I like the slower version better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deepex Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 The slower versions were the only versions I knew until the CD reissue came out. That totttaally fucked with me. It felt so rushed. But since it was obviously intended to be faster, I kept the legit versions. Now I've gotten used to it and that slow version sounds really slow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Coalbucket PI Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 I'd somehow never heard this until the CD came out so I only know the faster one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest yetihunter Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 heat night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest no carrier Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 the first time i ever heard this song was on a tape made of the original record: it's the faster one. the reissue HAB CD backs this up, although it mixes up the track names for every day and arched maid on the back of the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBLA Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 fast is the way. i knew when i had the slow versions something wasn't right. everyday didn't sound right. fast is the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.