Jump to content
IGNORED

First Antimatter Atom Is Trapped


Redruth

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I hope we can do something awesome with anti matter besides using it as a weapon more powerful than the hydrogen bomb.

Amen to that, brother. If you mean that such a weapon would be a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we can do something awesome with anti matter besides using it as a weapon more powerful than the hydrogen bomb.

Amen to that, brother. If you mean that such a weapon would be a disaster.

 

 

Quantities measured in grams would be required to achieve destructive effect comparable with conventional nuclear weapons; one gram of antimatter annihilating with one gram of matter produces 180 terajoules, the equivalent of 42.96 kilotons of TNT (approximately 3 times the bomb dropped on Hiroshima - and as such enough to power an average city for an extensive amount of time).

 

Who ever develops this will definitely be the next world power.

 

I'm beginning to question their motives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's bad enough that there are still nuclear weapons in countries' arsenals, but nooo, we also need to worry about anti-matter weapons. :sad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we can do something awesome with anti matter besides using it as a weapon more powerful than the hydrogen bomb.

Amen to that, brother. If you mean that such a weapon would be a disaster.

 

 

Quantities measured in grams would be required to achieve destructive effect comparable with conventional nuclear weapons; one gram of antimatter annihilating with one gram of matter produces 180 terajoules, the equivalent of 42.96 kilotons of TNT (approximately 3 times the bomb dropped on Hiroshima - and as such enough to power an average city for an extensive amount of time).

 

Who ever develops this will definitely be the next world power.

 

I'm beginning to question their motives.

 

Making anti-matter weapons would be such a delicate, expensive, arduous and for now undo-able process I'm not too certain it will ever happen let alone in the near future. Basically what I'm saying is don't worry about it for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when i first heard about the LHC i felt a bit paranoid. i'd read there would be black hole and all that. of course that was ridiculous.

 

i can't say that the fear of "mad" scientists in high places without proper regard for the consequences of their findings was completely irrational.

 

i don't know. the possibilities are endless!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

next time maybe we'll do it essines way since he asked so nice

Sorry troony, i am grumpy as fuck and just preyed on the first person i could. Everyone does it (as in everyone posts a thread which contains merely a link, but at least you had a pic). And it isn't that big a deal, I am just an ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest disparaissant

while it would be horrible if they did weaponize this stuff, it doesn't produce radiation, right? so yeah loads of death all at once, but no lingering repurcussions? lesser of two evils? i mean still fucked up but certainly not "we're going to kill EVERYTHING" fucked up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest disparaissant

Cancer will look like a common cold compared to anti-matter wormholes gesticulating in your gut.

probably a quicker death, either way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry troony, i am grumpy as fuck and just preyed on the first person i could. Everyone does it (as in everyone posts a thread which contains merely a link, but at least you had a pic). And it isn't that big a deal, I am just an ass.

figured there must have been something else going on essines, appriciate your kind words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this article was interesting. Looking forward to more Physics based threads.

 

So obviously aliens are just anti-matter beings and thats why we havn't run into them yet cuz if we tried to shake hands they would blow up the universe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"How do you store something that explodes with enough energy to destroy a city block when it comes into contact with just about anything?

Antimatter is not something that can be found by itself in a jar on a table," comments Gerald Share of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory

in Washington D.C. in a Space.com interview.

 

"Once the antimatter forms it has to be quickly channeled into special high-tech tanks called ‘Penning Traps.’ Inside, magnetic fields hold

the antimatter suspended in a total vacuum and keep it from bumping into the tank walls.

 

Currently, only three particle colliders on Earth can even make and store antimatter: Brookhaven National Laboratories on

Long Island, New York; Fermi National. Accelerator outside of Chicago; and CERN west of Geneva, Switzerland. Even these

three machines together only make a tiny amount."

 

“Right now, only about 84 billionths of a gram of antiprotons are made worldwide,” according to Los Alamos physicist Steve Howe.

"Making antimatter isn’t cheap, antimatter is the most expensive substance on Earth,”

says Dave Dooling of NASA, “about $62.5 trillion a gram.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Look at picture

2. Draw parallel to this:

gescom.jpg

3. Accept IDM nature at face value, stroke chin at a job well done, finish night masturbating over comprehensive bit rate analyses of your digital music collection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.