Zephyr_Nova Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/newtonai/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Super lurker ultra V12 Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/newtonai/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hautlle Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zephyr_Nova Posted June 29, 2011 Author Share Posted June 29, 2011 Whatever, still news to me. I thought it was neat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essines Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 It is also news to me. Thanks, you two, for pointing it out earlier! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ricky Downtown Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 so i wonder what crazy shit computers are doing now, 2 years into the future? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 so i wonder what crazy shit computers are doing now, 2 years into the future? watmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 so i wonder what crazy shit computers are doing now, 2 years into the future? haha, nice work ;-] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nene multiple assgasms Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 now they just need to get it to decipher some shit that humans haven't already worked out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenGOD Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zazen Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 This article isn't really about what it claims to be about, as usual with science journalism. So they basically just shoved some experimental data from specific experiments with pendulums etc into a computer with some genetic algorithms and it was able to figure out the underlying relationships. Sort of interesting, but thats not all the 'laws of physics'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 This article isn't really about what it claims to be about, as usual with science journalism. So they basically just shoved some experimental data from specific experiments with pendulums etc into a computer with some genetic algorithms and it was able to figure out the underlying relationships. Sort of interesting, but thats not all the 'laws of physics'. The computer would need apples, cannonballs, feathers, and melons, for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.