Jump to content
IGNORED

stupid first world problems you're dealing with


Guest KY

Recommended Posts

 

 

i've been writing a bit of music with a friend where he comes up with guitar and bass lines and i'm working on the other stuff and i talked to him tonight about doing it more and i guess really the ball is in my court to really work with what i have, it's not that i'm depressed but just majorly uninspired and i guess i have to kick my ass to do this and also wtf this a great run-on sentence.

 

Discipline > Inspiration

 

Even when you're not inspired, force yourself to do *something*.

That way when you are inspired, you have some material to work with.

 

Absolutely.  Those bits I force myself to do out of boredom usually end up becoming greater inspiration than "a burst of inspiration" does.  I find the process leads to inspiration rather than the other way around.

 

alright, i'll make it a ting, guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

take heart from the fact that that video is filled with fake news.

 

I'm sure that all of the rational governments in the world will make good choices to remedy the problems mentioned in that video. You know, like the big countries with vast amounts of wealth and resources. Totally gonna do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the problems he mentions don't actually exist though, we haven't hit peak oil, gas or coal (coal use has declined, because we're thankfully using it less), and aren't likely to any time soon. The bit about titanium was nonsense, and we're not going to run out of other metals or plastics or other resources any time soon either. Once resources do start to become scarce we can just mine asteroids and the moon. He exaggerates the degree of extinction and the impact of modern farming practices too, agriculture is very productive and has massive scope for further improvements. His arguments for reducing consumption/living standards are the usual genocidal malthusian bilge. The only real problem is climate change, and that isn't going to cause civilization to collapse, just make things shitty for a lot of people. The planet will cope fine, and we'll adapt if we need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he definitely stumbled on a lot of points, especially the peak fossil fuels stuff. but my point is that the ideal political situation in which large-scale adaptation and cooperation to address the issues that many countries are already facing is not exactly happening right now. i know there is improvement in many countries but currently we're seeing reactionary politics spread everywhere and i don't see that as a trend that is going to die without a fight. to say that the planet will 'cope' is quite idealistic. then again, you never fail to impress me with your optimism, lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... Once resources do start to become scarce we can just mine asteroids and the moon. He exaggerates the degree of extinction and the impact of modern farming practices too, agriculture is very productive and has massive scope for further improvements. ...

 

You actually believe this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep. don't bother with this, it's not worth the time. he is profoundly blinkered by a kind of book-learned transhumanist-style ignorance. can't see the forest for the trees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the problems he mentions don't actually exist though, we haven't hit peak oil, gas or coal (coal use has declined, because we're thankfully using it less), and aren't likely to any time soon. The bit about titanium was nonsense, and we're not going to run out of other metals or plastics or other resources any time soon either. Once resources do start to become scarce we can just mine asteroids and the moon. He exaggerates the degree of extinction and the impact of modern farming practices too, agriculture is very productive and has massive scope for further improvements. His arguments for reducing consumption/living standards are the usual genocidal malthusian bilge. The only real problem is climate change, and that isn't going to cause civilization to collapse, just make things shitty for a lot of people. The planet will cope fine, and we'll adapt if we need to.

 

 

not saying i wasn't looking for a pinch of salt when watching it but he sticks to the same timeline and basic stats that the science is laying out for us... 2100 and 4 degrees celsius which seems like a trajectory that makes a lot of sense the way things are going. 

 

as for the collapse of 'everything' i think we'll hit several tipping points along the way that will change how we live.. more than just banning straws. likely some things that most of us don't think about like widespread contamination of the romaine lettuce supply ;)

 

there's already more romaine lettuce growing and waiting to be harvested.. the caesar salad shortage cannot last. 

 

obvious things will be water shortages.  once the glacier retreats over the mtns between india and china that ganges will dry the fuck out. 

 

i'm more optimistic about energy supply and future technological advances. lab grown meats and all that. if it takes off in a big way we'll have various kinds of protein and only super rich people will be able to have actual cow meat or something...  pretty sure we'll have what seems like a long period of chaos and suckiness for lot's of people.  if we push through that then our descendants will have the opportunity to exist in one of many possible dystopian worlds. 

 

im-half-full-im-half-empty-i-think-its-p

 

edit: also i find his voice is too close to that guy who did the "zeitgeist" documentary which was totally debunked in like 1000 ways so anything w/that voice makes it hard for me to take it seriously. i think that guy started some kind of cult. 

Edited by ignatius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep. don't bother with this, it's not worth the time. he is profoundly blinkered by a kind of book-learned transhumanist-style ignorance. can't see the forest for the trees.

 

In some parallel universe, this interchange took place at a smoke-filled bar.  I nod my head to acknowledge. What are you having?

Edited by Godwin Austen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I bought an Xbox One X for no apparent reason other that playing my OG Xbox and Xbox 360 games. Thanks Black Friday!

i got a code for a 14 day trial for something called 'xbox game pass' which i think i have no access to, considering i only have a pc and a 360. if you want it its urs bb

Thanks, to lure me in it came with a free month of the stuff!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My iPod touch is really old (1st gen) so i can't use some apps i'd like to, angry birds is slow, and the battery is starting to die.

 

economist_cover_oh_fuck_september_2008.g

 

 

My cousin who works at Apple HQ in CA mentioned while visiting over Thanksgiving that there is a new generation of iPods said to be in early development stages, it'll probably be a couple years but 500GB-1TB ipods are a possibility in the near future.

Edited by ghOsty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1TB iPod would be sweet, though my first instinct is that he was fucking with you ghOsty.

 

If it happens, knowing it's more niche now, and of course it's Apple, it'll probably be $1500. Put an cell connection in it for streaming and downloading and then cell carriers will push it for as a secondary device for anyone already with an iPhone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe a bit of a throwback but I still like the idea of a dedicated music device that I can fit all of my music on.

I have a 400gb ipod classic. Doesn't hold all my music but it does well enough. It's flash memory too rather than a hard disk, so if you want to just switch out flash drives it's easy enough.

 

I don't like using cloud services or streaming stuff all the time. Can't be arsed to fuck with data and apps etc if I'm just going to listen to music for 20 minutes on the commute to work...

Edited by Bulk VanderHooj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Maybe a bit of a throwback but I still like the idea of a dedicated music device that I can fit all of my music on.

I have a 400gb ipod classic. Doesn't hold all my music but it does well enough. It's flash memory too rather than a hard disk, so if you want to just switch out flash drives it's easy enough.

 

I don't like using cloud services or streaming stuff all the time. Can't be arsed to fuck with data and apps etc if I'm just going to listen to music for 20 minutes on the commute to work...

 

 

I take it that's a personalised one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why would anyone want an ipod when you're already carrying a phone

I’ve always had an iPod. When my last one died I got 160gb iPod from eBay. I like a dedicated music device. I like to have my phone free for phone stuff. iPod is often plugged in to a stereo. Also battery lasts forever so cross country flights, long drives etc are no problem. Also it’s easier to navigate than a touch screen. I like the data wheel and having just one button. Click click

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he definitely stumbled on a lot of points, especially the peak fossil fuels stuff. but my point is that the ideal political situation in which large-scale adaptation and cooperation to address the issues that many countries are already facing is not exactly happening right now. i know there is improvement in many countries but currently we're seeing reactionary politics spread everywhere and i don't see that as a trend that is going to die without a fight. to say that the planet will 'cope' is quite idealistic. then again, you never fail to impress me with your optimism, lol

 

you've mistaken my pointing out that his certainty that the world is doomed is not supported by the evidence as optimism. I'm pretty realistic about what might be in store for us regarding climate change, and there are many possible scenarios which involve various different timescales for sea level/temperature rise, this is even according to the IPCC themselves (and there should be some scepticism about their projections too, there's a big difference between finding the cause for things that have actually happened and trying to predict the future based off possibly faulty or incomplete models, and the inherent problem of predicting the behavior of chaotic systems in general, of course that also leaves open the possibility than it could be much worse than their projections too). 

 

you're completely right that most countries are not reacting like they should be, especially with regard to the current trend of prematurely closing down nuclear plants which still have 20-40 years left on their intended lifespan (which just effectively adds many more years to the lifespans of coal and oil plants). we need to very quickly phase out all coal plants, and get started on oil plants too, this doesn't look like it's going to happen any time soon though unless there's a real change of political will.

 

it's not all bad new though, Taiwan just voted to overturn their governments plan to phase out nuclear:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2018/11/24/pro-nuclear-activists-win-landslide-electoral-victory-in-taiwan/#5a4d11bb29a0

 

people will slowly come round to a pro-nuclear stance as it becomes increasingly obvious that targets can't be met with a renewables-only strategy. "environmentalists" will then have to come to terms with their complicity in the failure to effectively react to climate change, they are as much to blame as christian fundamentalists who believe god gave them the world to do with as they see fit.

 

and when I said the planet will cope that doesn't mean we as a species are going to be fine, even with the least bad projections there are going to be serious consequences for millions of people. the planet itself, and life in general will be fine though, it has dealt with much worse in terms of CO2 concentrations in the distant past, it has dealt with many mass extinction events. if shit gets really bad then we'll have to adapt to the new environment, I see no reason to believe we won't be able to, even if it's going to be very bad for large numbers of people.

 

 

... Once resources do start to become scarce we can just mine asteroids and the moon. He exaggerates the degree of extinction and the impact of modern farming practices too, agriculture is very productive and has massive scope for further improvements. ...

 

You actually believe this?

 

which bit, the space mining bit? of course, why wouldn't I? we already have the technical knowhow to go there and bring stuff back, work needs to be done regarding the mining technology, but seeing as we're not likely to run out of anything on earth for another 50-100 years (and much much longer for most things) there's plenty of time to figure that stuff out. the main barrier is the cost though, not the technology, but once stuff starts getting scarce down here that argument goes away pretty quickly. also yes re agriculture, ppl thought we were all doomed to mass starvation from population growth prior to the 50s/60s too, before the green revolution radically improved crop yields. there are many different avenues to continued improvements, both in terms of traditional agriculture (hardy GMOs), but also growing stuff indoors: lab grown protein, hydroponics, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Maybe a bit of a throwback but I still like the idea of a dedicated music device that I can fit all of my music on.

I have a 400gb ipod classic. Doesn't hold all my music but it does well enough. It's flash memory too rather than a hard disk, so if you want to just switch out flash drives it's easy enough.

 

I don't like using cloud services or streaming stuff all the time. Can't be arsed to fuck with data and apps etc if I'm just going to listen to music for 20 minutes on the commute to work...

 

 

I take it that's a personalised one

 

 

Yeah, I had one built for me. Really enjoy having a dedicated music player especially downstairs on the stereo and when driving to work, don't want to fuss with other things.

 

Oh right, the battery on this one is 3000mah, and the flash memory doesn't draw much power? So I get a solid 3 or more weeks of play without having to charge it. If I was using my phone (which I already kill the battery on almost daily) it would suck.

 

Lots of benefits to a dedicated music device IMO. Only problem with a iPod > 240gb memory (I think 240gb is the number) the software architecture has reached its limits. Not a huge problem but tracks have to be searched by album as they drop out of the "song" list. Just have to rebuild the device database every couple months and it's fixt.

Edited by Bulk VanderHooj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.