Jump to content

So lets analyse Richards Studio


Recommended Posts

I wish Mr James would put out some of his experimental vintage twiddlings say under a silly alias on Rephlex so the fanboys wont get in a mardy because it doesn't sound like Drukqs but the analogue geeks can hapily masturbate over knowing only the man himself purveys synthesizers of this fine quality

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish Mr James would put out some of his experimental vintage twiddlings say under a silly alias on Rephlex so the fanboys wont get in a mardy because it doesn't sound like Drukqs but the analogue geeks can hapily masturbate over knowing only the man himself purveys synthesizers of this fine quality

 

What, again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha what the fuck was that a broken leslie?

 

its part of the speaker for the GX1 of which I remember Mr James was on some synth mailing list asking SOS's Gordon Reid about a replacement as they are the only two lucky buggers known to own one in the uk

 

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb00/articles/yamahagx1.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

its part of the speaker for the GX1 of which I remember Mr James was on some synth mailing list asking SOS's Gordon Reid about a replacement as they are the only two lucky buggers known to own one in the uk

 

http://www.soundonso...s/yamahagx1.htm

 

Technically, I believe the GX-1 was designed to work with TX-IIs. These are pretty top of the range, with a woofer, four squawkers and four tweeters, but no Leslie-style rotation. Having said that, the GX-1 will work with any Electone cabinet model. I believe the speaker in the video is a Yamaha RA-200 or RA-200R. (There's also at least one other model in the series, the RA-100, but that only has two rotary speakers, not three, so it's not the one in the video).

 

Not that any of this matters because there are plenty of synthesisers that sound great which are much more affordable, lighter, smaller, easier to maintain, and easier to integrate with the rest of a modern studio. :D The GX-1 and even the CS-80 (while we're talking about flagship Yamaha models) sound like they're very expressive and versatile, but more hassle than they're worth given how hard it would be to find a technician who can repair them or, say, retrofit MIDI into them... although it sounds like RDJ managed to find someone to do the latter somehow, so good for him.

 

If you got any more GX-1s into the UK, this small island would sink under the weight!

Link to post
Share on other sites

...or it's a Yamaha R-60B, which definitely is in the Electone range. Although it's really not important, and far too close to the world of organs for my liking, even if it does happen to hook up to technically one of the best synthesisers ever made. I guess it's another marketing issue, make a fantastic synthesiser and market it is being a bit like an organ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...or it's a Yamaha R-60B, which definitely is in the Electone range. Although it's really not important, and far too close to the world of organs for my liking, even if it does happen to hook up to technically one of the best synthesisers ever made. I guess it's another marketing issue, make a fantastic synthesiser and market it is being a bit like an organ.

If you have time and some soldering skills there is a great modification guide for the Yamaha E-70 written by Marc Brasse. It adds rotary pots to the synth parameters (osc, filter, env, etc). I picked one up locally for $500, which I think is fairly standard. Sometimes you can find them for free, as people just want to get the 300lb beasts out of their homes.

You essentially get 2 preset polyphonic synthesizers, a monophonic 2 octive bass synth and a wonderfully lofi preset rhythm machine before modding.

It sound really great! Although the oscillators are technically not analogue, but a sort of early wavetable type of synthesis, they sound really vast.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5q91MT5320&feature=related

Edited by DerWaschbar
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 8 years later...

Necromancing this thread because I always wondered whether he used Notator or Cubase, given those were the two main MIDI sequencers on the Atari ST in the early 90s...  And it turned out (at least for Analogue Bubblebath 3 opener .215061) it was neither.  There was a more obscure MIDI sequencer on the Atari ST called Dr. T's Tiger, and he used the cut down version of that, Tiger Cub.

On 12/1/2011 at 10:32 AM, noise said:

a toaster

You joke, but I happened to use a toaster in my last track...  Hell, I'm listening to .000890569 right now, and that starts off with a vacuum cleaner...

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
On 11/10/2020 at 2:23 AM, ZoeB said:

Necromancing this thread because I always wondered whether he used Notator or Cubase, given those were the two main MIDI sequencers on the Atari ST in the early 90s...  And it turned out (at least for Analogue Bubblebath 3 opener .215061) it was neither.  There was a more obscure MIDI sequencer on the Atari ST called Dr. T's Tiger, and he used the cut down version of that, Tiger Cub.

You joke, but I happened to use a toaster in my last track...  Hell, I'm listening to .000890569 right now, and that starts off with a vacuum cleaner...

i've always been so curious about what his exact setup was for those early records (SAW 85-92, Sine waves, etc)

as far as I know its Atari ST, DX100, casio fz-10, sh101, quadraverb, and roland r8 w/808 card for drums recorded to cassette tape 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By fxbip
      https://aphextwin.bandcamp.com/
    • By feltopptak
      Coming soon on ROHS! RECORDS (4th December 2020)
      https://rohsrecords.bandcamp.com
      NEW NOYZELAB Album "CPMSubtree" audio will follow soon
       
      Noyzelab is David Burraston - or is it that David Burraston is Noyzelab? After experiencing the man's work, you may not be able to tell the difference. Noyzelab's debut at ROHS! is a surrounding and otherworldly album called CPMSubtree, made up of five surreal displays of studio electronics that elasticize the album's forty-minute runtime into unfathomable stretches of displacement. 
      Currently residing in Australia, Burraston has spent many years refining his focus in many different departments - lectures and residencies around the world, collaborations with Aphex Twin, Chris Watson, Oren Ambarchi and Russell Haswell, recordings published at Important Records, Taiga, .MEDS, Cataclyst and Psoma Psi Phi, and installations assembled in dozens of indoor and outdoor spaces. He has built his own synthesizers and has written his PhD thesis on Generative Music & Cellular Automata, working to explore and document his research with generative systems, computing and all kinds of synthesis. On top of all of these things, he's often found with portable recording rigs, doing field recording to capture exotic and interesting atmospheres. 
      CPMSubtree is, at least in name, a follow-up to TTMSubtree, a cassette issued at Psoma Psi Phi in 2017, although the sounds presented here are wholly unique, in their own macroverse of existence. When listening to Burraston's music, you can never be quite sure what it is you're hearing or feeling - is that a sinewave, or feedback? Are those bells or a DX7? Is that a gust of Cootamundra wind on the mic, or algorithmically processed white noise? Are we frozen in space while otherworldly spectrums of color billow around us at light speed, or are we being poured down a waterfall, one molecule at a time, to coalesce into a pool of pulsing fluorescence? You might ask yourself any or all of these questions - but Noyzelab does not provide any answers. This is a one-way trip that you can't come back from, so proceed at your own discretion! For those of us eager to map the frontier of new and stimulating electronic music, the unknown has never been quite so rewarding. 
      NOTE: Noyzelab recordings utilize the full breadth of the frequency spectrum, and as such, are best experienced with either headphones or speaker systems that can yield very high and very low frequencies without issue. Lossless file formats are also encouraged, to minimize the reduction of these frequencies and their presence within the recordings. 
    • By dcsux
      https://twitter.com/phonicarecords/status/1313114352803811330?s=20
      🧐
    • By Ell
      Hi,
      I have a complete Analord binder (binder and records in mint condition) that I’ve owned from new since release. The binder was ordered direct via Rephlex’s website and the records from bleep.com as they were released. I haven’t played them and they’ve been in storage since buying. I’m getting more into buying synths/hardware and making my own music now and was wondering if anyone would be interested in a swap for their old/unwanted synth hardware.
      Ideally, and maybe in my dream world 🙂 ,I’d like a Roland JX3P or SH101, but would consider any sensible offers of analogue or digital gear. Also I live in England near to Folkestone in Kent so would prefer to trade with someone in London/South East so we could physically meet and exchange the items.
      If this of interest to anyone then drop me a message. Can provide pics etc to confirm condition.
    • By dcom
      Worth buying for the Mescalinium United's We Have Arrived TTQ Mix alone.
×
×
  • Create New...