Jump to content

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Nebraska said:

file.jpg

this film is an epistolary of wes anderson obsessions

  Hide contents

when i was growing up, i distinctly remember the adrian mole books. the main character was a very interesting kind of nerd because he treated every little thing that happened in his life as though it was some important historic event that needed to be catalogued for futures benefit. eg when the family dog is taken to the vet, the date, time and manner of the dog's treatment is recorded and observed. it insisted on this kind of data collection and i see this film (and most wes anderson films) as sharing that characteristic. 

everything from the dialogue to the art direction to the collection of "things" in the film and of course- the characters. 

 

I found this film very hard to watch. Loved it until after the first short but felt overwhelmed with all the minute detail. During the last short, I closed my eyes in the theater for a bit because I couldn't keep up. I think this would work a lot better watching each short on their own instead of watching the movie as a whole in one sitting.  Wes has reached peak Anderson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last-Night-in-Soho-Frontpage-750x400.jpg

Watched Last Night In Soho the other day. Loved the first half, the latter was alright, had some gripes with the story like

Spoiler

why wouldn't you realise the ghastly hallucinations of men are fake after the first time? Almost stabbing someone because of "Oh this is it now" was such a stupid scene like wtf?

Also can't help but see the doctor here with Matt Smith :duckhunt:

Edited by chronical
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, chronical said:

Last-Night-in-Soho-Frontpage-750x400.jpg

Watched Last Night In Soho the other day. Loved the first half, the latter was alright, had some gripes with the story like

  Reveal hidden contents

Also can't help but see the doctor here with Matt Smith :duckhunt:

This film had me wriggling in my seat and wanting to leave, the performance McKenzie was soooooooo cringe it hurt my eyes.

The rest of this film is pretty entertaining (production design is great and Taylor-Joy was spot on) but Tamsin was terribly miscast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2021 at 11:55 AM, Danny O Flannagin said:

I found this film very hard to watch. Loved it until after the first short but felt overwhelmed with all the minute detail. During the last short, I closed my eyes in the theater for a bit because I couldn't keep up. I think this would work a lot b/etter watching each short on their own instead of watching the movie as a whole in one sitting.  Wes has reached peak Anderson

Why did e chose black and white? The color master goes black and white. bummed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2021 at 10:46 PM, frankixus said:

Melancholia (2011) Lars von Trier: 4/5

Sweet Thing (2020) Alexandre Rockwell: 5/5

Climax (2018) Gaspar Noe: 4/5

Love (2015) Gaspar Noe: 4/5

Lost in Translation (2003) Sofia Copolla's only good film: 4,5/5

I really like Somewhere by Sofia Copolla - give it a chance if you haven't seen it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, raljax said:

I really like Somewhere by Sofia Copolla - give it a chance if you haven't seen it.

Isn't there a sense of diminishing returns with Noe though? i'll always want to watch his work and it's not like he shat the bed a la Aronofsky did on Noah but imo he needs to work with the best acting talent - get Vincent Cassel back somehow or kidnap the actors Audiard finds/uses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bamboozled-2000-posterimg.jpg

spike lee has technically been making the same film over and over again for many years, so you will not be surprised to learn you've already seen this film (if you've ever seen any of his films). basically, an affluent black dude realizes the racism that surrounds his community and spends the next 2hrs harping about it while spike lee occasionally chimes in by having all characters talk directly to the screen about what his main character is harping about.

when he first did it in do the right thing it seemed new and interesting. but now it's a little repetitive and tired. unless you're spike lee in which case, thank god somebody said it again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Nebraska said:

Bamboozled-2000-posterimg.jpg

spike lee has technically been making the same film over and over again for many years, so you will not be surprised to learn you've already seen this film (if you've ever seen any of his films). basically, an affluent black dude realizes the racism that surrounds his community and spends the next 2hrs harping about it while spike lee occasionally chimes in by having all characters talk directly to the screen about what his main character is harping about.

when he first did it in do the right thing it seemed new and interesting. but now it's a little repetitive and tired. unless you're spike lee in which case, thank god somebody said it again

Girl 6 was a weird one, but he’s been coasting for decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just going to post something positive about one of his recent movies, Summer of Sam, googled it and that fucker is from 99. Depression set in.

Edited by Silent Member
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ i enjoyed get on the bus a lot. thought the chemistry amongst the cast was tops. also, absolutely loved his documentary nyc epicenters 9/11→2021½

i thought, given the films obvious reference to early minstrel shows and the piccaninny freeze sign, spike would "release the kraken". he did not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lGXyaGL.jpg

can't believe how bad they fucked this up

Spoiler

the entire film is a table read of the episode that's supposed to air after lucy and desi are accused of being communists. clearly this film is more interested in the technicalities of the actors- direction etc rather than telling any kind of "story"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nebraska said:

lGXyaGL.jpg

can't believe how bad they fucked this up

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Apparently, the biggest issue with the movie (according to the internet) is that Javier Bardem is from Spain. NOT from Cuba. They can't do that. They can't do that!

  • Farnsworth 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

220px-The_Matrix_Resurrections.jpg

terrible. and i mean- TERRIBLE

Spoiler

wtf? this film is like a $50 remake of the first film with budget actors except for the 3 returning cast members. everything about this was terrible- from the TERRIBLE costumes, cheesy dialogue, sfx, lighting, stunts, fight choreography- what the hell was that terrible low frame rate crap they tried to pull with the bullet time conversations? and how many times did they have to repeat neo stopping bullets? wtf was this? oh and jada pinkett? really? she's the entire elder council for io? really? her? oh- and how bad was her acting? and some of the machines are pets? wow

 

  • Haha 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Nebraska said:

220px-The_Matrix_Resurrections.jpg

terrible. and i mean- TERRIBLE

  Reveal hidden contents

 

It started out like it was going to be really meta, with some mind blowing twist or even psychological horror, but it quickly descended into a generic remake of The Matrix 1. 100% shot on soundstages and back lots, with super cheesy slo-mo yelling, "Triniiiiityyyy!!!", "Neeeeeeeo!" what the fudge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah. it went meta and cringe at the same time. it felt like it might have been an interesting story if it explored the coexistence with the sentient ai's. would have been interesting to explore that direction. instead, it's mostly cringeworthy fan fiction. but that's the meta. the sheeple want it that way... i guess.

o, and there's a good bunch of cynical references to 911. but that could be me. if you've seen the movie, you prob understand what im talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Matrix was really good. I was expecting it to be bad after reading these comments, but it's one of those 'you'll really like it, or really hate it' kind of movies. I think I like it more than even the first one.. well actually I like reloaded a lot more than the first one too though, but I need to watch it again to see. Half my family hated it and the other half really liked it. It's kinda jarring actually to see the seething hate and like of it right now. I feel Matrix 2 - now 4 really isn't for everyone and the reactions I am seeing prove it.

I don't think it overplayed the meta aspect. I was expecting to cringe at the meta but I thought it was done well. The criticism comes off as hyperbole given what I just watched. I do think they should have changed the humans from being an energy source to like an intuitive hive mind they can weaponize against the other Ai the film mentions. I'm surprised that wasn't retconned.

Edited by Brisbot
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading some reviews of Matrix Resurrections, here is my opinion on what went wrong:

Spoiler

I wanted this movie to go full Jacob's Ladder, they had a novel approach that they wasted almost immediately: do a reboot movie about an actual reboot in this universe, not just an "upgrade". Why make Keanu be Thomas again? Trinity was someone else, so why not make Keanu a random nobody, a real stalker who is convinced Trinity is somehow his soul mate? The walls of his sanity needed to close in on him, I wouldn't even have minded if almost the entire movie took place IRL, and he just had flashbacks of the Matrix, or why not have Keanu wake up in the Matrix and now HE is Agent Smith? Maybe the Matrix is a recurring nightmare he keeps having. Lean into the blue pill/red pill addiction angle, it seemed like a dig at big pharma anyway. Have Neil Patrick Harris be a real analyst, and have Keanu go A Scanner Darkly, and not know what's real and what's fiction. Maybe even Trinity is his real wife, and she's trying to break thru his psychosis and pull him out of it? It could end with Neo realizing he's a real life schlub, going to the daily grind he did every day before he was awakened, then he could have the idea to write a game called The Matrix. The End. 

you're welcome ?

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Rubin Farr said:

After reading some reviews of Matrix Resurrections, here is my opinion on what went wrong:

  Hide contents

I wanted this movie to go full Jacob's Ladder, they had a novel approach that they wasted almost immediately: do a reboot movie about an actual reboot in this universe, not just an "upgrade". Why make Keanu be Thomas again? Trinity was someone else, so why not make Keanu a random nobody, a real stalker who is convinced Trinity is somehow his soul mate? The walls of his sanity needed to close in on him, I wouldn't even have minded if almost the entire movie took place IRL, and he just had flashbacks of the Matrix, or why not have Keanu wake up in the Matrix and now HE is Agent Smith? Maybe the Matrix is a recurring nightmare he keeps having. Lean into the blue pill/red pill addiction angle, it seemed like a dig at big pharma anyway. Have Neil Patrick Harris be a real analyst, and have Keanu go A Scanner Darkly, and not know what's real and what's fiction. Maybe even Trinity is his real wife, and she's trying to break thru his psychosis and pull him out of it? It could end with Neo realizing he's a real life schlub, going to the daily grind he did every day before he was awakened, then he could have the idea to write a game called The Matrix. The End. 

you're welcome ?

 

i watched a few interviews with lana wachowski and...

Spoiler

i got the feeling this is more of a commentary of the hollywood system of reboots/remakes i.e. a commentary of how we do things again and again and to mock the that cycle and how it's NEVER the same thing or successful.

my problem with this is how badly even this was done- especially in the fx department. did they purposely have to make those scenes terrible, or is there also a point about not being able to catch lightening twice because everyone involved is not "as good as they were before"? also, was it just me or was keanu more cliche keanu than normal? i think this was a matter of effort and clearly, when lana wachowski says "it wasn't planned. it wasn't orchestrated in any way." 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.