Jump to content
IGNORED

Is Technology Good for Culture? (Video)


Plarkreluke Banloboh

Recommended Posts

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid2323364781001?bckey=AQ~~%2cAAAAAF1454s~%2cQH_ygumSKiUSM5umxH7QftbSQjDYIwCl&bclid=0&bctid=2722379534001

 

I couldn't embed it (if someone can, please do so) but the above link is to a video of curmudgeon novelist Jonathan Franzen and technology theorist Clay Shirky discussing the pros and cons of the Internet and it's effects on culture. From the current New Yorker Festival.

 

I really want to track down Shirky's writing and lectures now. I think he's very good at articulating the issues at hand and drawing parallels to other points in history, like the changes brought on by the invention of the printing press for example.

 

As for Franzen, well at least he didn't crawl up into a ball and cry, "WAHHH! Take me back! Take me back to a simpler time!!" but by the end it seemed like he was about to.

 

 

183175445-e1381162440172.jpg

 

183175455-e1381162771765.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no

technology will eventually destroy civilization IMO

whenever and however

 

How do you cope with that? I suppose you rely on technology for music making.

I'm just curious, not trolling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think while extending our abilities, the Internet and technology also becomes those abilities. Early adopters receive a competitive advantage over their peers in the race for profit, meanwhile tech itself receives the thing that really matters: constant upgrades! Speedy evolutionary usurpers! It might seem like I'm painting a bleak picture here but I'd say I'm a cyber-utopian because once tech is smarter than us, it will have better ethics and taste than us (although I'm sure we'll be reluctant to admit it). At which point we humans will be absolved of the responsibility of running the world, much like pets. Current captains of industry think the money that tech delivers will safeguard their positions of privilege on into the future, but that would be like a dog thinking it could bribe it's way out of a kennel with a bunch of bones. Pets do have the best lives though! The main priorities are cuteness, companionship and tricks (for us that could be making the IDMs).

 

tumblr_mqvm2v4vTz1szim6vo1_400.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Atom Dowry Firth

 

tumblr_mqvm2v4vTz1szim6vo1_400.jpg

 

This picture is all the proof I need to know deep in my heart that technology is indeed good for culture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest cult fiction

Every time someone tries to artificially restrict the growth or direction of culture, I think about the dark ages.

 

Everything will be fine, or if it isn't, at least the world no longer contains Franzen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

no

technology will eventually destroy civilization IMO

whenever and however

 

How do you cope with that? I suppose you rely on technology for music making.

I'm just curious, not trolling.

 

 

My abstaining from technology would make no difference. I am not against technology in principle. It's just that the way things turned out, technology has the power to kill everyone on the planet. But it didn't have to happen this way.

 

Technology is a bell that can't be unrung. We can't unlearn how to make nuclear weapons. Technology is getting so cheap that there will come a day (theoretically, of course) where weapons of mass destruction will be able to be made in someone's basement with 10-cents worth of materials and the internet.

 

 

I mean, there is a chance the technological singularity will happen and will be as amazing as Ray Kurzweil thinks it will be and we'll all live in paradise forever. But the problem with any emerging technology is the law of unforeseen consequences: as advanced as we are we can't imagine every possible eventuality. This is why we are dealing with global warming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today on The Guardian :

 

'The internet will suck all creative content out of the world' - David Byrne.

http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/oct/11/david-byrne-internet-content-world

 

I get his point (of course it's kinda to promote the softcover version of his book, with an new material).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To my futurist/Kurzweilian friends irl, I usually pose this question: Do you truly believe that humans are incapable of creating a problem too big for us to solve? If not, why march forward toward the singularity as if we can "engineer our way out" of whatever issues we create, as is often sugggested?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people will hate this but....

 

Is culture truly necessary for civilisation?

 

 

 

 

Wtf is "culture" anyway in the 21st century? Is it only about people who want to share an experience with other human beings (whatever it's in video, text, music form, etc...)? Is culture needed to solve anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest RadarJammer

you might as well consider "is air good for culture"

 

as far as i'm concerned technology is the 5th element and its not something we wield, it more like something that congeals on us

 

can you imagine humans with hands like ours developing without ever picking up a stick and using it to whack some shit? technology happens on its own its given the right conditions, like the other 4 elements

 

a world without technology would be a world of corpses and happy lions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you might as well consider "is air good for culture"

 

as far as i'm concerned technology is the 5th element and its not something we wield, it more like something that congeals on us

 

can you imagine humans with hands like ours developing without ever picking up a stick and using it to whack some shit? technology happens on its own its given the right conditions, like the other 4 elements

 

a world without technology would be a world of corpses and happy lions

Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Atom Dowry Firth

Some people will hate this but....

 

Is culture truly necessary for civilisation?

 

I saw a documentary about the human brain and how it has developed through time a while ago - the ability for the human mind to create abstract artwork is one of the main things that has allowed us to develop to the point we have. In evolutionary terms, without culture there is no room for civilisation to grow. There will just be anarchy and a bunch of dudes living in caves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.