Jump to content
IGNORED

the watmm GAS thread


modey

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, DavieAddison said:

It looks like a PlayStation 1

It looks to me like they were going for Nagra SNST (those sweet mid-century surveillance recorders that you could actually still find for a couple hundred LESS than this thing until a few years ago), but halfway through someone said "what if we mde it look more like a Yak Bak?"

 

2695044170_36e6006002_b.jpg

 

 

plus

 

e0824d9637f2180ae886b9376ed85cae.jpg

 

 

equals

 

IMG_4748.jpeg

 

Plus just a hint of 

minidisc-sony-md-walkman-mz-r700pc-76874

 

Edited by TubularCorporation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All joking aside, though, I like good design and I can appreciate overspending for the sake of it, but I think the TE stuff is butt ugly at any price.  I wouldn't shit talk it so much if I actually liked the designs (or if they were really ugly in a way that was funny or charming or even interesting; as it is, if i saw their products at a RISD senior show I'd rank them maybe a C+.

 

But I feel the same way about virtually every Apple design (especially the G3 and newer stuff) so I'm obviously not their target demographic.

Edited by TubularCorporation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Taupe Beats said:

My concerns here are slightly different. It's more an issue of "Who's going to shoot first?".

The market for all this gear is still within a limited scope. The vast majority of stuff coming out ultimately overlaps all kinds of gear that's preceded it, often by the same company producing the new stuff. So when a developer goes out and tries to get some attention saying "hey this is a new concept!", I'm intrigued and want to learn/scrutinize. So then, when what they actually demonstrate doesn't really align to an actual new concept, it feels snake oil-ish. And I do think there's some legitimately negative consequence in that, as it may put other developers off who look up to some of these more successful developers. So yay more Roland/Oberheim cloning!

fair points, yeah. had a bit of that with the Kodamo Mask 1 that just came out...it sounds good but it's not particularly unique from anything i've heard out of it so far.

yay more cloning :nyan:

i guess ultimately i'm just glad to see the market robust enough to allow for this sort of random development and experimentation happening. that means more good across the board, in theory.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TubularCorporation said:

All joking aside, though, I like good design and I can appreciate overspending for the sake of it, but I think the TE stuff is butt ugly at any price.  I wouldn't shit talk it so much if I actually liked the designs (or if they were really ugly in a way that was funny or charming or even interesting; as it is, if i saw their products at a RISD senior show I'd rank them maybe a C+.

 

But I feel the same way about virtually every Apple design (especially the G3 and newer stuff) so I'm obviously not their target demographic.

Ok, fair enough; you find them (te and apple) ugly or not interesting enough and that’s that 

But im curious to see which gear (comps, synths, music gear) designs do you like? 

Edited by xox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/13/2023 at 5:51 PM, auxien said:

this is pretty fucking brilliant

tl;dw it's miniature controllable guitar feedback (but with tines not strings)

"We're hitting the resonator with an electromagnetic hammer" - that's pretty cool actually, I guess they're just switching on and off an electromagnet really quick instead of physically hitting it with a hammer.. But also makes me wonder why they wouldn't just put some simple physical key action in there as well. Though it somehow weirds me out that they're calling it "acoustic synthesis" lol - is an electric guitar also acoustic synthesis? A pianola?

By the way was that forked tine shape they're showing ever used in any of the classic electric pianos?

 

Re: Erica Steam Pipe: finally people are getting around to doing 1% of what Yamaha VL did 30 years ago... (don't mean to diss it though, I'm happy for any and all attention that physmod synthesis gets)

Edited by th555
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, th555 said:

"We're hitting the resonator with an electromagnetic hammer" - that's pretty cool actually, I guess they're just switching on and off an electromagnet really quick instead of physically hitting it with a hammer..

If I understand the bit at 4:00 correctly, they're still "hitting" it but then the electrical signal they pick up goes into an electronic circuit where they boost it so it's sustained or kill it (see 4:45). It's the signal in the electronic circuit that they can do synthesis with it.

I believe, but I'm not sure, that this is different from a regular electric piano where the sustain is purely acoustic, albeit amplified. Here the sustain is electronic.

So basically it's a really convoluted method for generating sine waves ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, th555 said:

"We're hitting the resonator with an electromagnetic hammer" - that's pretty cool actually, I guess they're just switching on and off an electromagnet really quick instead of physically hitting it with a hammer.. But also makes me wonder why they wouldn't just put some simple physical key action in there as well.

more control possible with the electromagnetic impulsing, i would assume. Tats/others may have said as much as well but i can't remember exactly (there's at least a half dozen videos about this on YT). physical key action could be tight but probably less control by default, or more difficult to achieve truly tight control.

2 hours ago, th555 said:

Though it somehow weirds me out that they're calling it "acoustic synthesis" lol - is an electric guitar also acoustic synthesis? A pianola?

that's why i brought up the guitar feedback thing...it's like being able to highly and expertly control guitar feedback in a highly musical way and more directly than just raw open feedbacking. could get really interesting after some more development.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, xox said:

Ok, fair enough; you find them (te and apple) ugly or not interesting enough and that’s that 

But im curious to see which gear (comps, synths, music gear) designs do you like? 

 

1200px-Wollensak_portable_reel-to-reel_t

oto-machines-oto-bam.jpg

i-img1200x1200-1671257405qjkmwj88180.jpg

il_fullxfull.325754198.jpg

fbspvq4unnmr3p8wukqy__02623.1598613727.j

Soma-Synthesizers-Lyra-8-Atom-Heart-Moth

3mtrqk1rlspy.jpg

1.jpg

Marantz-2265B.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, auxien said:

that's why i brought up the guitar feedback thing...it's like being able to highly and expertly control guitar feedback in a highly musical way and more directly than just raw open feedbacking. could get really interesting after some more development.

Most of the commercial products that use electromagnetic feedback like this have been really guitar oriented (the original electromagnetic sustainers that use a mechanically coupled driver were patented over 100 years ago and designed for Hawaiian slack key players, and as far as I know the eBow was the first commercial product that drove the string itself, although the exact same principle has been used for spring reverbs since at least the 1940s).

I jsut found out about this while I was checking to see if there were any commercial keyboard instrumnts that drove the strings with electromagnets out there.  It's not commercial but it's pretty cool:

Composers have been driving piano strings with electromagnets since the 50s at least but this is a whole other level of it.

 

 

This is all reminding me of back around 2004 when I wanted to convert a turntable into a delay by mounting a disk with some kind of tape-like magnetic coating on the platter and using two linear tracking arms on opposite sides with tape heads where the styluses would normally be, and simple mechanical controls to move them across the radius of the platter. Sort of like a cross between an Echoplex and the Drum Buddy.  I didn't have any electroncis experience at all back then, though, and now that I do I don't have easy access to dozens of free (or at least $50-$10) turntables anymore.

Edited by TubularCorporation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, auxien said:

that's why i brought up the guitar feedback thing...it's like being able to highly and expertly control guitar feedback in a highly musical way and more directly than just raw open feedbacking. could get really interesting after some more development.

That’s a pretty good analogy. Something acoustic sets in motion a feedback loop in an electronic circuit. Only difference is in guitar feedback the feedback loop is maintained by the strings  picking up the sound from the speaker and feeding it back into the pickups and here it’s done electronically, in a kind of resonance circuit (like in filters).

If you listen to the demos, this is in fact exactly what it sounds like. First the tines are hit and you get a bell like sound and then you’re sustain which sounds like a sine wave (like resonance and guitar feedback).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, xox said:

So you basically like vintage stuff?

Not across the board, it's more that I favor a functional, humanist design philosophy and that has been out of fashion for the last 20 years or so.  

I also think it's hard to talk about functional design if you haven't used the thing hands-on (I haven't built a Lyra 8 yet but I made an exception for it.  Everytrhing else I posted is something that I have either owned or used extensively at some point.

I think the Hydrasynth is an amazing piece of design from what I've seen, but I haven't used one.  I really like the design of the Kilpatrick Phenol and the Linnstrument (even though I'm not a fan of grid cotnrollers in general, aesthetically or functionally). The DrumBuddy is a phenomenal piece of design but I didn't think you'd take it seriously in context.  I didn't include the OTO BAM because of it's retro-ish aesthetic, I included it because I've had one for a few years and it has oen of the fastest, most intuitive interfaces of any piece of gear I've handled in my life.  I actually think their visual designs are a bit gimmicky, maybe even borderline ugly, but as a tool that you need to physically interact with they're exceptional. Kind of how I feel about Elektron stuff, it's ugly but it's so natural to use that once you spend some time with it the underlying elegance of the design comes out - it's designed for your hands, not your eyes.  A bit less so with the newer, square-button stuff. 

I'm struggling to think of musical equipment from the last 30 years that comes anywhere near the quality of design that goes into the average gamepad, though.

Of all the things I posted, the IBM Model M is easily the best and most important.

Edited by TubularCorporation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking about it a litte (because this is one of my sort of pet issues) and I think this is a good analogy for what bugs me about the new milled-aluminum TE designs:

nagra-iv-s-172823.jpg

is to

 

teenage-engineering-tp7-field-recorder-f

as

18rpwnvrmun8zpng.png

is to

incredible_victorian_steampunk_comupter_

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few more examples of good design and then I can't put off work any longer:

 

Marshall-PEDL-00001-1-Button-Amplifier-F

 

1911.jpg

GoPro-Hero7-Black-Main.jpg

(Visually I think the earlier, sharp-cornered models up to Hero 4 are nicer, but rounding it off is definitely a better functional design since those sharp corners were a stress point so the newer, rounded models should be less likely to break).

 

2000?cb=20080612060651

 

BMD-HYPERD-RSTEXCTR-2.jpg

 

(I've never used a Blackmagic controller so my opinion might change after I felt the buttons and jog wheel, but in terms of layout and visual design it's excellent).

Edited by TubularCorporation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, auxien said:

musical instrument design has all been downhill since this tbqh

Meh. The single reed(tm) upgrade from 10,000 BC made it possible to play  square waves and not just sines, so that was kind of cool.

image.thumb.jpeg.6300466f19cd1857a8eb856a08f07179.jpeg

 

 

Reeds_kataglott_anaglott.jpg

  • Big Brain 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Limo said:

Meh. The single reed(tm) upgrade from 10,000 BC made it possible to play  square waves and not just sines, so that was kind of cool.

image.thumb.jpeg.6300466f19cd1857a8eb856a08f07179.jpeg

 

 

Reeds_kataglott_anaglott.jpg

need a wavetable flute otherwise i just can't get into these days tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, auxien said:

need a wavetable flute otherwise i just can't get into these days tho

Judging from Superbooth the wave table trend has passed and it’s now all about physical modeling so I guess it’s time to put a flute in your flute.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah beautiful dictaphone ?

i could maybe place it on my coffee table and just watch the spinning “tape” reel spins

 

ezgif.com_optimize_2.gif

Edited by xox
  • Burger 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

been in love with my Peak since i got it about 3 years ago, but occasionally i'll see something like this vid and wonder if i want to jump up to the Summit. even more knobs and front-facing options for live manipulation. and obv more notes. 

 :catbed:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.