zero 837 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 35 minutes ago, Braintree said: How does a racist have a beautiful black wife? I had no clue who this guy even is, but that confused me as well. I don't know enough about proud boys to understand what the hell they believe in exactly. found this article on him though...apparently he's not racist? https://www.kitv.com/story/42687573/facebook-deletes-campaign-page-of-proud-boy-running-for-hawaii-house-seat Quote The Democratic Party of Hawaii also called out Ochs for a history of offensive posts on social media about the Black, Jewish, and LGBT communities, as well as a video showing Ochs urinating into active lava fissure at the Kilauea volcano. "This isn't a political issue, this is a moral issue, this is about what we as a community stand for and we as welcoming people of Hawaii believe in," says Tyler Dos Santos-Tam, the chair of the Hawaii Democratic Party. Ochs' opponent, Democratic nominee Adrian Tam, also denounced the posts. "I hope the voters know that this does not represent Hawaii values and more importantly that they exercise their right to vote and reject this racism, bigotry, and hateful ideology," he says. Ochs is defending himself, saying while his language isn't politically correct, he denies he's a racist or white supremacist. "I'm happy to talk to anyone. And again, I am either the world's worst racist, or I'm not a racist. You have to acknowledge that a white supremacist does not marry a black woman and have a mixed family, that is not what that word means and the people that are throwing it around are disingenuous," Ochs tells KITV4. The Democratic Party of Hawaii called on the Hawaii Republican Party to denounce Ochs' remarks. Republican Party chair Shirlene Ostrov told KITV4 the party had no comment, and that they stand by Ochs as their GOP nominee for the seat. Link to post Share on other sites
very honest 1260 Posted Wednesday at 08:37 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 08:37 PM (edited) right after trump was suspended from youtube for 7 days, his acting AG put up a video that's actually good new member, part of qanon caucus: Edited Wednesday at 08:42 PM by very honest 1 Link to post Share on other sites
zero 837 Posted Wednesday at 09:13 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 09:13 PM ^ that last one exhibits classic karen posturing...the way her shoulders are slightly hunched, mouth jutted forward...I don't even need to hear a word to be able to tell it is going to be non-stop verbal diarrhea time 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Rubin Farr 2905 Posted Wednesday at 09:21 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 09:21 PM 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Nebraska 1786 Posted Wednesday at 09:24 PM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 09:24 PM (edited) big T impeached for the 2nd time. Edited Wednesday at 09:24 PM by Nebraska 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites
jules 967 Posted Wednesday at 09:33 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 09:33 PM Does that mean he loses his healthcare, pension, travel, and ability to ever run for office again or does it have to go through the Senate to determine that? Link to post Share on other sites
Braintree 1529 Posted Wednesday at 09:42 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 09:42 PM Impeached AGAIN. This guys just won't stop #winning. Link to post Share on other sites
Upset man 134 Posted Wednesday at 09:52 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 09:52 PM 18 minutes ago, jules said: Does that mean he loses his healthcare, pension, travel, and ability to ever run for office again or does it have to go through the Senate to determine that? I’m of the understanding he has to be convicted in the senate first 1 Link to post Share on other sites
jules 967 Posted Wednesday at 09:57 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 09:57 PM 4 minutes ago, Upset man said: I’m of the understanding he has to be convicted in the senate first Damn. Oh well. He def won't be convicted in the Senate. And now we pay him for the rest of his life. Link to post Share on other sites
ignatius 5952 Posted Wednesday at 10:00 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 10:00 PM (edited) 3 minutes ago, jules said: Damn. Oh well. He def won't be convicted in the Senate. And now we pay him for the rest of his life. The fallback position could be censuring him under Article 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prevents someone who's taken part in an insurrection against the United States from ever running for federal office. Edited Wednesday at 10:01 PM by ignatius 4 Link to post Share on other sites
Rubin Farr 2905 Posted Wednesday at 10:01 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 10:01 PM Censuring him can affect his ability to run again, collect his pension, etc. I believe. He also still gets his full Secret Service detail, as I think his entire family does, to defend them from a lifetime of being harassed in public, people throwing stuff at them, maybe trying to physically accost one they don’t like. ymmv 1 Link to post Share on other sites
randomsummer 422 Posted Wednesday at 10:01 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 10:01 PM 1 minute ago, jules said: Damn. Oh well. He def won't be convicted in the Senate. And now we pay him for the rest of his life. I wouldn't be so sure. Mitch hasn't said one way or the other, he said he'll listen to the evidence (lol, shouldn't he do that every time?). I read somewhere that one of the biggest motivators to convict in the Senate is because the Rs have recently lost a lot of big / corporate donors, and they think that if they convict Trump it could bring some of that money flowing back in. It's just crazy enough to work, having money be the only motivation for impeachment. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
TubularCorporation 705 Posted Wednesday at 10:12 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 10:12 PM 39 minutes ago, jules said: Does that mean he loses his healthcare, pension, travel, and ability to ever run for office again or does it have to go through the Senate to determine that? No, it means the senate won't pass it and nothing will happen. 12 minutes ago, randomsummer said: I wouldn't be so sure. Mitch hasn't said one way or the other, he said he'll listen to the evidence (lol, shouldn't he do that every time?). I read somewhere that one of the biggest motivators to convict in the Senate is because the Rs have recently lost a lot of big / corporate donors, and they think that if they convict Trump it could bring some of that money flowing back in. It's just crazy enough to work, having money be the only motivation for impeachment. I'm pretty sure it takes a 2/3 majority. Not happening. Link to post Share on other sites
Upset man 134 Posted Wednesday at 10:42 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 10:42 PM So censure him. He shouldn’t receive a pension or any government benefits. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Rubin Farr 2905 Posted Wednesday at 10:51 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 10:51 PM 8 minutes ago, Upset man said: So censure him. He shouldn’t receive a pension or any government benefits. Also realize what a pain in the ass it is to secure the surrounding area to Trump Tower Link to post Share on other sites
Nebraska 1786 Posted Wednesday at 11:55 PM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 11:55 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, jules said: Does that mean he loses his healthcare, pension, travel, and ability to ever run for office again or does it have to go through the Senate to determine that? has to go through the senate to determine if he will charged. this is basically the black spot according to the articles Edited Wednesday at 11:56 PM by Nebraska Link to post Share on other sites
whosebrian 794 Posted Thursday at 12:01 AM Share Posted Thursday at 12:01 AM 2 hours ago, jules said: Does that mean he loses his healthcare, pension, travel, and ability to ever run for office again or does it have to go through the Senate to determine that? Convicting someone who is impeached requires a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate. Then the Senate can permanently disqualify the convict from any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States by a simple majority vote. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
ignatius 5952 Posted Thursday at 01:58 AM Share Posted Thursday at 01:58 AM Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites
ignatius 5952 Posted Thursday at 02:05 AM Share Posted Thursday at 02:05 AM (edited) https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emmanuelfelton/capitol-police-angry-congress-members-ignore-metal-detectors Quote Two of the officers who spoke to BuzzFeed News said it wouldn’t surprise them if lawmakers had been involved. “There are definitely some members who need to be held to account once an investigation shows the totality of circumstances,” one said. “Let’s be very clear, we are here for Congress,” a veteran officer said. “We are the buffer, so that Congress doesn’t have to deal with the mess that they create in their respective districts, so they don’t have to deal with the public. That’s primarily what our mission is — police work is kind of a second thought.” Edited Thursday at 02:18 AM by ignatius 3 1 5 1 Link to post Share on other sites
joshuatxuk 843 Posted Thursday at 03:43 AM Share Posted Thursday at 03:43 AM ^ I thought nothing would top him self-owning by revealing that his "doctor wife" told him wet pussies were a concerning medical issue. This is a contender. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
joshuatxuk 843 Posted Thursday at 03:46 AM Share Posted Thursday at 03:46 AM 7 hours ago, very honest said: 1 Link to post Share on other sites
joshuatxuk 843 Posted Thursday at 03:51 AM Share Posted Thursday at 03:51 AM Another interesting note, those NG soldiers are with the 29th ID as seen on their shoulder badges. That division was the main one at Omaha Beach at Normandy. It's emblem symbolizes the unification of past militias and regiments from both the North and South. Quote As the division was composed of men from states that had units that fought for both the North and South during the Civil War, it was nicknamed the "Blue and Gray" division, after the blue uniforms of the Union and the gray uniforms of the Confederate armies during the American Civil War.[7] 4 Link to post Share on other sites
Nebraska 1786 Posted Thursday at 04:12 AM Author Share Posted Thursday at 04:12 AM wordSent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk 3 Link to post Share on other sites
prdctvsm 3264 Posted Thursday at 04:14 AM Share Posted Thursday at 04:14 AM 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Upset man 134 Posted Thursday at 04:44 AM Share Posted Thursday at 04:44 AM 1 4 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now