Jump to content
IGNORED

AI - The artificial intelligence thread


YO303

Recommended Posts

I guess it just changes how art is created. Like software DAWs and VSTs did. For me its just a new software that I can use.  people just have to adapt.  but art will stay art. midi did not remove people playing the piano. 

I like the idea alot that at one point you can create tracks and music videos by just typing some kind of prompt. It will come soon

 

https://openai.com/blog/jukebox/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

4 hours ago, o00o said:

I guess it just changes how art is created. Like software DAWs and VSTs did. For me its just a new software that I can use.  people just have to adapt.  but art will stay art. midi did not remove people playing the piano. 

I like the idea alot that at one point you can create tracks and music videos by just typing some kind of prompt. It will come soon

 

https://openai.com/blog/jukebox/

I think there is a fundamental difference between DALLE-2 and DAWs and VSTs: automating creativity. DALLE-2 automates for you all the technicalities of drawing or making something visual without your absolute control apart from a "description", while DAWs and VST are still relatively simple tools mostly under your creative control—they don't do for you the final end product, while DALLE-2 does.

I also think that all arts will be automated. Also that music is one of the hardest since I think it has more emotive permeability than the others, hence more abstract and subjective than visual stuff. For me, once music is automated, I will be finally convinced that the soul is mathematical.

Edited by logakght
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah one day art will be like a sort of trip where you just think about things and they will be generated on the fly. at the beginning you will have to select them somehow but it will come to a point where they are not precreated at all

 

like think about it even games are still precreated with all their interactivity. but this will no more be the case at some point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, logakght said:

Also that music is one of the hardest since I think it has more emotive permeability than the others, hence more abstract and subjective than visual stuff. For me, once music is automated, I will be finally convinced that the soul is mathematical.

I disagree that music is more subjectively beautiful than visual art - for example, many people in Canada think the purchase of Voice of Fire was a waste of money, not real art etc. I think it's an amazing piece of work.

What i think the automation of music is lacking right now is the soul that you are talking about. I have a few Endel albums in my collection, and the ones that are made in collaboration with actual humans (like James Blake or ANNA) are so much better than the ones produced solely by the AI. The AI ones are a bland collection of tones, and lack everything that makes music special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, chenGOD said:

I disagree that music is more subjectively beautiful than visual art - for example, many people in Canada think the purchase of Voice of Fire was a waste of money, not real art etc. I think it's an amazing piece of work.

What i think the automation of music is lacking right now is the soul that you are talking about. I have a few Endel albums in my collection, and the ones that are made in collaboration with actual humans (like James Blake or ANNA) are so much better than the ones produced solely by the AI. The AI ones are a bland collection of tones, and lack everything that makes music special.

I believe music is more subjective because we are visual entities, we "imagine visuals" so it's easier for us to understand visual cues. It's easier to imagine the source of a sound than the sound of a source.

I definitely agree that the efforts on AI for music creation (I highlight this because there are already AI to synthesize sound, but not creating it) are lacking. Is there a book like "Point and Line to Plane" by  Kandinsky but for music?—I think we could define what makes music have "soul" with such insights.

I think ambient music is the closest to unanimously be liked by everyone, so I think an AI could start working on that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, iococoi said:

 

he was referring to that stable diffusion thingy tough

Quote

But Stable Diffusion’s lack of safeguards compared to systems like DALL-E 2 poses tricky ethical questions for the AI community. Even if the results aren’t perfectly convincing yet, making fake images of public figures opens a large can of worms. And making the raw components of the system freely available leaves the door open to bad actors who could train them on subjectively inappropriate content, like pornography and graphic violence.

https://stability.ai/blog/stable-diffusion-announcement

Edited by iococoi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iococoi said:

And making the raw components of the system freely available leaves the door open to bad actors who could train them on subjectively inappropriate content, like pornography and graphic violence.

the use of ‘could’ here is a laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, iococoi said:

 

People have been whining about digital cheating for a long time. 

Big whoop, these cookie-cutter fan artists are easy for an AI to mimic... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chim said:

People have been whining about digital cheating for a long time. 

Big whoop, these cookie-cutter fan artists are easy for an AI to mimic... 

Whats a fan artist.

I feel like its the same as those artist that call electronic music fake or w/e

Edited by Wunderbar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Wunderbar said:

Whats a fan artist.

I feel like its the same as those artist that call electronic music fake or w/e

People who piggyback on famous franchises with fan art to maximize their audience. The original twitter poster does a lot of pokemon & mario shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, chim said:

People who piggyback on famous franchises with fan art to maximize their audience. The original twitter poster does a lot of pokemon & mario shit.

Yea i found it funny he is crying about the ai stealing other peoples designs etc. And then he links his own art and its a drawing of bowser lol.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the art AIs have learned from us how to reproduce what we do.  you may even be able to tweak their parameters and make them make things we've never made.  but it's generated from the data originally inputted to them, which is actually human made art.  when you see these weird beautiful AI images, you are looking at the collective art of humanity, not art created by the AI.  there is nothing removing the soul of art in AI simply calculating a few tensor operations

the true AI art comes from people who use the AI in novel ways.  and it is made by the people, not the AI.  just as the painting is not made by the brush, even if some unique brushes let you make nice abstract textures

Edited by ilqx hermolia xpli
  • Like 1
  • Big Brain 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has potential. People who don't dig the restrictions of Dall-E, for whatever reason, are going to have a field day. 

nedladdning.png

Spoiler

405113577_nedladdning(1).png.bc0024320fd56ce5d1c92dc2eff05cb5.png

625014612_nedladdning(2).png.4f6b67ba619a0dae57030c700de878a3.png

"Aphex Twin DJ'ing at Auschwitz"

 

Edited by chim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Summon Dot E X E said:

I think human brains are made up of something like neural networks, though, if just vastly more complex. So the human process, though maybe unique in its consciousness, is not too dissimilar from the result of a machine learning model.

i disagree, the human brain is in fact so much more complex than a neural network that it's hard to make any comparison whatsoever, in fact I would not even put them in the same categories except for historical coincidences of naming

i would go as far as to say that all the world's AI cannot even simulate a single human neuron

Edited by ilqx hermolia xpli
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

pornpen.ai generates adult imagery with custom AI algorithms. Any generations of content on this website that resemble real people are purely coincidental.

https://pornpen.ai/

... convenient

firefox_uy0rTARSc2.png.8746705d5dc12e367b3a218ec2c756cb.png

number of the horny beast

lulululululz

Spoiler

844430B5825F6F9E.jpeg

 

Edited by iococoi
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.