Jump to content
IGNORED

Elon Musk's Starman - Is this shit real wtf


YO303

Recommended Posts

I think he articulated it fairly well.

 

How is it Elon Musks' responsibility to solve homelessness and world hunger any more than it is your own responsibility.

 

Not a strawman.

Edited by Bulk VanderHooj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for moving back to the original subject: Perhaps we should use those seemingly limitless resources of money to make sure that everyone gets a fair shake in society. Maybe everyone should get fed and everyone should have shelter. Throwing a car into space isn't exactly progress to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't (and isn't) about throwing a car into space. 

 

Pretty sure food/shelter is what your government is for, not private citizens?

Edited by Bulk VanderHooj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he articulated it fairly well.

 

How is it Elon Musks' responsibility to solve homelessness and world hunger any more than it is your own responsibility.

 

Not a strawman.

 

Because he has a billion dollars and I don't. If you're trying to equate my position in a capitalist society equal to his as far as giving power, then you're sorely out of touch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elon donates 10s of millions of dollars, just not to food/shelter/water.

 

It just seems like a weird comment that by virtue of his fortune he is suddenly responsible for fixing food and homelessness like that's anything to do with him. 

 

There are very real and very useful applications for the stuff spaceX, tesla etc is researching (and doing) - to chalk it up to throwing a car into space is disingenuous. 

Edited by Bulk VanderHooj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that it's no measure of progress because we haven't even solved the simplest of problems humanity creates for itself.


/lastpost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're changing the focus of the subject onto me instead of addressing the facts. That is by definition a straw man argument.

 

http://www.logicalfallacies.info/ambiguity/straw-man/

 

The link you posted doesn't support what you're saying at all.  Maybe it could be weakly called an ad hominem argument but it's not a straw man, that's a different fallacy entirely.  I didn't misrepresent what you were saying and attack a misrepresentation, which is what a straw man is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Perhaps we should use those seemingly limitless resources of money to make sure that everyone gets a fair shake in society.

He earned that money by participating in the capitalist process that creates those problems in the first place

 

 

Yeah, helping with the creation of PayPal to undercut incumbent payment processors and allow anyone to be a seller online causes capitalist problems.  Helping with the creation of a new era where electric cars are soon going to become dominant is causing all sorts of capitalist problems.  Making space flight cheaper by creating reusable rockets instead of throwaway ones makes capitalist problems worse

 

The naivete in this thread...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Perhaps we should use those seemingly limitless resources of money to make sure that everyone gets a fair shake in society.

He earned that money by participating in the capitalist process that creates those problems in the first place

 

 

Yeah, helping with the creation of PayPal to undercut incumbent payment processors and allow anyone to be a seller online causes capitalist problems.  Helping with the creation of a new era where electric cars are soon going to become dominant is causing all sorts of capitalist problems.  Making space flight cheaper by creating reusable rockets instead of throwaway ones makes capitalist problems worse

 

The naivete in this thread...

 

"What he made had some positive impact which means it had no negative impact at all"

 

Also I'm not talking about the end results, I'm talking about the means used to achieve them

Edited by span
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Perhaps we should use those seemingly limitless resources of money to make sure that everyone gets a fair shake in society.

He earned that money by participating in the capitalist process that creates those problems in the first place

 

 

Yeah, helping with the creation of PayPal to undercut incumbent payment processors and allow anyone to be a seller online causes capitalist problems.  Helping with the creation of a new era where electric cars are soon going to become dominant is causing all sorts of capitalist problems.  Making space flight cheaper by creating reusable rockets instead of throwaway ones makes capitalist problems worse

 

The naivete in this thread...

 

"What he made had some positive impact which means it had no negative impact at all"

 

Also I'm not talking about the end results, I'm talking about the means used to achieve them

 

 

What means used to achieve them?  You have to list them or your claims are worthless

 

 

Didn't paypal help out with stopping payment towards sources that those in control deemed unworthy/a threat or something equally odious and totalitarian?

 

Probably - PayPal is indeed pretty shit in a lot of areas and it's not a perfect solution like crypto is.  But it's better to have credit cards + PayPal than just credit cards.  It was revolutionary for its time and extremely disruptive, helping a lot of online small business owners to actually have a chance as opposed to having literally no practical way to conduct their business at all.  Undoubtedly a net gain for society at the time despite it being shit now in comparison to alternatives.

Edited by Zeffolia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

Perhaps we should use those seemingly limitless resources of money to make sure that everyone gets a fair shake in society.

He earned that money by participating in the capitalist process that creates those problems in the first place

 

 

Yeah, helping with the creation of PayPal to undercut incumbent payment processors and allow anyone to be a seller online causes capitalist problems.  Helping with the creation of a new era where electric cars are soon going to become dominant is causing all sorts of capitalist problems.  Making space flight cheaper by creating reusable rockets instead of throwaway ones makes capitalist problems worse

 

The naivete in this thread...

 

"What he made had some positive impact which means it had no negative impact at all"

 

Also I'm not talking about the end results, I'm talking about the means used to achieve them

 

 

What means used to achieve them?  You have to list them or your claims are worthless

 

I've no specific issues with Elon in particular, I was just replying to Braintree's point about Elon using his money for 'good', as in, using it to feed the homeless and make sure everyone gets food and whatever. Just pointing that you can't solve this system's problems from within the system. I'm too tired and ignorant to elaborate on this, but you can't just profit from the current system, create or enable (directly or indirectly) those problems Braintree mentions, then throw money at them to somehow solve them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

it's not a perfect solution like crypto is

 

what is crypto the solution to?

 

 

To all currency, monetary policy, wealth management, and anonymous payment related problems.  Before we needed third party intermediaries to hold our money in between a transaction - now we can just give money directly to the person even if we don't know who they are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last time I checked having 2 electric vehicle companies and a solar panel company was beneficial for humanity and that's good enough for me and It would be just as good under any other economical system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last time I checked having 2 electric vehicle companies and a solar panel company was beneficial for humanity and that's good enough for me and It would be just as good under any other economical system.

iunno man imo is p shitty, why doesn't he give me all his money instead of investing in shit? p shitty imho
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Last time I checked having 2 electric vehicle companies and a solar panel company was beneficial for humanity and that's good enough for me and It would be just as good under any other economical system.

iunno man imo is p shitty, why doesn't he give me all his money instead of investing in shit? p shitty imho

 

i kno man, heck him tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.