Jump to content
IGNORED

Ghostbusters 3: Afterlife


jaderpansen

Recommended Posts

 

The biggest flaw of the last Ghostbusters movie was that it was over two goddamn hours long. It’s a comedy, you guys. 88 minutes. Get in, get out.

also writing jokes could help

Yeah, you hated it more than I did (there were parts I quite enjoyed) but it was pretty obvious when the director just got lazy and told the cast to improv.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok what about:

 

Ryan Reynolds as Peter Venkman-esque sarcastic guy.

 

Seth Rogen as slightly chubby Ray Stanz-esque geeky dude.

 

Sacha Baron-Cohen as Egon Spengler-esque ultra clever deadpan nerd (not sure he's the right fit for such an underplayed role to be fair, but maybe, just maybe)

 

Not sure what to do about Winston Zeddemore without it being racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Those kerraazzyyy pranksters were the reason why the cartoon version (as in the cartoon version featuring the characters from the film version) had to be called 'The Real Ghostbusters'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mcbpete said:

Those kerraazzyyy pranksters were the reason why the cartoon version (as in the cartoon version featuring the characters from the film version) had to be called 'The Real Ghostbusters'

Plus there was a cartoon version of the above live show:

51+Y8a5WRxL._SY445_.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

YEESH stranger things kid is in this too! he was in IT also. hopefully the film has children looking for ghosts and scary things that would be fun

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • Joyrex changed the title to Ghostbusters 3: Afterlife
1 hour ago, Gocab said:

Completely uninterested in this.

Agreed - this appears to be a Ghostbusters movie in name only. I dare them to surprise me.

24 minutes ago, Soloman Tump said:

Afterlife.

CGI Egon Spengler incoming in act 3!

I feel like I have seen everything in this film already.  Sorry. Its a remake, this time with children instead of women.

I am really surprised that in the first official trailer, no sign of Ackroyd, Murray, Weaver, etc. - not a good sign.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.