Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
IOS

T ess xi harmony

Recommended Posts

T ess xi starts off with a chord progression, 16 bars long, shown in the attached image.

 

post-14347-0-22160300-1552755942_thumb.jpg

 

In bar 1 we have four notes (music harmony people: Eb major seventh chord). For our purpose here, think of those four notes as two intervals played simultaneously, the lower interval (coloured dark grey), and the upper (light grey) interval.

 

From this initial position in bar 1, the movement of those intervals for bars [1..8] is as follows:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Going from bar 8 to bar 9, the intervals change: their low notes are shifted up two rows (so whereas the intervals were perfect fifths in bars [1..8], they've now become perfect fourths for bars [9..16]). Following that, for bars [9..16] the "intervallic movement" stays the same as in bars [1..8], so again:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row [!]
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Notice what happens in bar 15 (indicated with [!]): as the lower interval is moved down 1 row, two notes now overlap (in F#) and are fused together.

 

This progression is heard twice (so bars [17..32] are identical to [1..16]).  After that, the entire process is repeated but lowered by a semitone etc.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

T ess xi starts off with a chord progression, 16 bars long, shown in the attached image.

 

attachicon.gifAe - t ess xi harmony.jpg

 

In bar 1 we have four notes (music harmony people: Eb major seventh chord). For our purpose here, think of those four notes as two intervals played simultaneously, the lower interval (coloured dark grey), and the upper (light grey) interval.

 

From this initial position in bar 1, the movement of those intervals for bars [1..8] is as follows:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Going from bar 8 to bar 9, the intervals change: their low notes are shifted up two rows (so whereas the intervals were perfect fifths in bars [1..8], they've now become perfect fourths for bars [9..16]). Following that, for bars [9..16] the "intervallic movement" stays the same as in bars [1..8], so again:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row [!]
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Notice what happens in bar 15 (indicated with [!]): as the lower interval is moved down 1 row, two notes now overlap (in F#) and are fused together.

 

This progression is heard twice (so bars [17..32] are identical to [1..16]).  After that, the entire process is repeated but lowered by a semitone etc.

 

hey! thnx man!

 

does this have a name? is it a known technique in the theory?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for writing this up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Thanks for posting this! I had a little trouble understanding your diagram, but it seems like with the chord voicing, that the notes from one chord to the next move up or down either in semi-tones or whole steps. This seems to abide by the rules of classical harmony. I tried learning more about harmony once by reading Schoenberg's Theory of Harmony. Understood very little of it and did not do any of the exercises, but (if I understood your diagram) this seems to be textbook classical harmony - taking the shortest possible route (voicing-wise) when moving from one chord to the next. Schoenberg also mentions the idea of building chords with fourths and fifths (instead of thirds) as a means of building up to his more radical innovations, which seems to link up with your analysis. I could never get into his music (in spite of several honest attempts) and I also never heard Autechre reference him or any other classical musician pre-Stockhausen, but there are some interesting ideas there. The idea that harmony evolved based on humans discovering the natural harmonic series on their own and gradually making dissonances conventional (adding them into the harmonic vocabulary) is also interesting. Apparently in ancient Greece, there was a time when the only harmony was everyone singing in unison - Dionysian yes, but not all that interesting and definitely not up to par with the splendors of a piece like 'Vose In'.

Edited by Drum Up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cool.

:emb: have audio samples of the melody playing ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

T ess xi starts off with a chord progression, 16 bars long, shown in the attached image.

 

attachicon.gifAe - t ess xi harmony.jpg

 

In bar 1 we have four notes (music harmony people: Eb major seventh chord). For our purpose here, think of those four notes as two intervals played simultaneously, the lower interval (coloured dark grey), and the upper (light grey) interval.

 

From this initial position in bar 1, the movement of those intervals for bars [1..8] is as follows:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Going from bar 8 to bar 9, the intervals change: their low notes are shifted up two rows (so whereas the intervals were perfect fifths in bars [1..8], they've now become perfect fourths for bars [9..16]). Following that, for bars [9..16] the "intervallic movement" stays the same as in bars [1..8], so again:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row [!]
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Notice what happens in bar 15 (indicated with [!]): as the lower interval is moved down 1 row, two notes now overlap (in F#) and are fused together.

 

This progression is heard twice (so bars [17..32] are identical to [1..16]).  After that, the entire process is repeated but lowered by a semitone etc.

 

hey! thnx man!

 

does this have a name? is it a known technique in the theory?

 

yeah. paralell fifths. And it's forbidden. :D ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paralell suns

Forbidden planet

 

Why forbidden?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In classic counterpoint paralell fifths (and paralell octaves) are forbidden, because in that paralell movement the parts are not considered autonomous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ got it thnx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome thread!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Nice analysis. Maybe I'm slightly ignorant but this is just rave though right?

 

(Not posting to be aggressive/inflammatory. I just hear/see it as a rave thing)

Edited by donquixote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...