Jump to content
IGNORED

making music without hearing it


Recommended Posts

The first computer I ever recorded on was the one Mac my school owned back in the early 90s (they had a couple PCs but those didn't have audio cards).

 

This was back when FULL DUPLEX SOUND was SERIOUS, so it didn't have that.  You could record or play back, but not at the same time, so at lunch a couple friends and I would get together and multitrack on it in Sound Edit 16 without being able to monitor what we had already recorded.  Plus I don't know what the record latency was, but you'd definitely have to measure it in seconds not milliseconds, so there was really no chance of having any control of how things lined up.

 

Other than that I only really do it if I'm recording stuff that I'll sample from later. Record something, do some blind overdubs, and then just plumb it for parts that are worth sampling.  I've done that two or three times in the last week alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beethoven has pulled this off 200 years ago

Have you ever tried making music without listening to it in the process?

He heard it in his head, he knew howd a cello or piano sound on d minor. Try to predict how will a granular or fm synth sound in d minor, legato... you mabye could but why would you? I doubt beethoven was happy with his illness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Beethoven has pulled this off 200 years ago

Have you ever tried making music without listening to it in the process?

He heard it in his head, he knew howd a cello or piano sound on d minor. Try to predict how will a granular or fm synth sound in d minor, legato... you mabye could but why would you? I doubt beethoven was happy with his illness

 

I think in the end the appeal is that something that sounds completely different from what you imagined would be the outcome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Beethoven has pulled this off 200 years ago

Have you ever tried making music without listening to it in the process?

He heard it in his head, he knew howd a cello or piano sound on d minor. Try to predict how will a granular or fm synth sound in d minor, legato... you mabye could but why would you? I doubt beethoven was happy with his illness

 

 

Apparently, Beethoven also used bone conduction to 'hear' his piano by biting down on a rod that was connected to it. You can try it out by biting down on the head of an unplugged electric guitar, it's pretty amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Beethoven has pulled this off 200 years ago

Have you ever tried making music without listening to it in the process?

He heard it in his head, he knew howd a cello or piano sound on d minor. Try to predict how will a granular or fm synth sound in d minor, legato... you mabye could but why would you? I doubt beethoven was happy with his illness
I think in the end the appeal is that something that sounds completely different from what you imagined would be the outcome

Now i understand your music much better ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Beethoven has pulled this off 200 years ago

Have you ever tried making music without listening to it in the process?

He heard it in his head, he knew howd a cello or piano sound on d minor. Try to predict how will a granular or fm synth sound in d minor, legato... you mabye could but why would you? I doubt beethoven was happy with his illness

 

That's because he'd spent his life learning the sounds of the orchestra. 

 

Dedicate the first 30 years of your life to intensely studying and manipulating granular and fm synths and there's no reason why you couldn't do the same.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Beethoven has pulled this off 200 years ago

Have you ever tried making music without listening to it in the process?

He heard it in his head, he knew howd a cello or piano sound on d minor. Try to predict how will a granular or fm synth sound in d minor, legato... you mabye could but why would you? I doubt beethoven was happy with his illness

That's because he'd spent his life learning the sounds of the orchestra.

 

Dedicate the first 30 years of your life to intensely studying and manipulating granular and fm synths and there's no reason why you couldn't do the same.

First part was my point exactly

Second part im not sure is the same as knowing the orchestra bc tou dont have standardized synths of any kind especially not granular and fm ones and they’re much more unpredictable than a piano or chello where timber is much less important in classical music vs el music. Sure it’s possible but also quite different imo

 

Edit: also, in ‘classical’ music you have conductors and musicians which have am excellent hearing and knowledge of music (...theory) and they can interpret the score to he even better than what was written

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only done it as a novelty at this point so far, like drawing or writing stuff that shows up in a stereogram. I think i'd prefer the inverse, where I have to listen but can't see anything, like Stevie Wonder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on the beak we had each person provide samples to each other and make a track without previewing the samples or listening to the work until it was done. here was fred's track:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.