Jump to content

Capitalist Bootlicker thread


chenGOD
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 1/4/2021 at 8:01 PM, dingformung said:

Why do you even decide to be a slave of your desires?

Do you not want things that are beautiful to you?

On 1/5/2021 at 3:28 PM, Amen Warrior said:

The cars my mates had were specifically a Jag xjs and a Mercedes 300sl, both mid late 80s, both kept in garages. They basically both rotted/rusted away. Maybe Porsches from that time were built different? Or maybe they just both bought duffers.

The Jag was fookin amazing when it worked though

THe jax xjs from the mid 80s (classic look) was absolute trash though. Possibly the lowest period of British automotive manufacturing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Hugh Mughnus said:

Which game? 

Well...  there may be others.

Over the last 12 months I've bought the followng big box and sealed games:
Prince of Persia (the original)
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
Full Throttle
Sim City 2000
Tie Fighter
Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast
Quake 2
Sim City (the original)
Prince of Persia 2 (Japanese Edition)
Wolfenstein 3D (for the Jaguar)
Daikatana

I was supposed to receive Marathon this week but the carrier fucked up big time so it looks like it has been delivered but they told me it has been sent back to the US.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 1/11/2021 at 12:30 AM, Enthusiast said:

image.png.181892ceff7b3d4f4f1b19a273df7cb5.png

Multistradas are beautiful. I'm not at the old man tourer phase of my riding life for at least a few more decades so I can't say I'd get one yet. I still want the reborn Streetfighter:

Image result for streetfighter v4

I'm very happy with my Monster for the foreseeable future though, I don't wanna trade it in.

2015-Ducati-Monster-1200S5.jpg

#ducatigang

wanting nice things has nothing to do with capitalism btw. innovation and beauty in design should be allowed to flourish regardless of economic/social settings, it's our job to make it all as balanced and sustainable as possible.

  • Farnsworth 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, usagi said:

wanting nice things has nothing to do with capitalism

I’m sorry comrade, I must report you. You may choose, 10 years in the gulag, or 2 hours of listening to a Marxist fanatic who doesn’t really know what he’s talking about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By mngosx
      I didn't get bitten by the streaming bug 'til I tried out Apple Music around 6 months ago; I tried Spotify and the lot but didn't really get into it cus of the bad interface (+ ogg vorbis). Once I found out that Apple Music had seamless integration with their library and your local library + tag editing I was hooked, the convenience of this platform has made it almost impossible to go back to my 100% local library. The question that's been biting me ever since has been, "Is this moral?" not only is Apple (and every other streaming service) paying artists close to nothing, but also technically restricting the user's freedom with DRM.
       
      Are streaming services further contributing to the corporate control over the music industry by shafting indie labels and individuals in the name of convenience? Do they cheapen the art form? Is any of this morally acceptable? 
×
×
  • Create New...