Jump to content

Walter Ostanek

Members
  • Posts

    162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Walter Ostanek

  1. 10 hours ago, decibal cooper said:

    Ketamine for my workplace depression? No thank you, I will stick with more traditional methods to preserve my sobriety and sense of self.

    8pmxft.jpg

    Friend of mine used to monitor cameras in a supermarket and used to creep me out by ringing me up whenever I was in there and telling me he was watching me.

    Separately, he once told me that he occasionally rubbed one out in his office

    edit: also he was a big mu-ziq fan

    • Haha 2
  2. On 4/26/2024 at 7:30 AM, EdamAnchorman said:

    Even in Marx's time he noticed that a separation was developing between the managerial class and the owners of production themselves, something that is now standard in publicly listed companies. This trend with Boeing is the meta version of that, in a similar vein to the rise of crypto and the fetishisation of real estate. Capital no longer gives a shit about the real economy at all. It's abstracting itself to some higher plane of circlejerk bullshit

    • Like 5
  3. On 3/10/2024 at 3:28 AM, LooseLink said:

    Underneath The Radar 2024.... why not?:

     

    That would be brilliant honestly

    Always got It Bites vibes from that track, maybe just because it's 6/8 like Calling All The Heroes (banger)

    hyde/smith it bites remix album?

    • Like 1
  4. Honestly I started to tune out somewhat over the pandemic. Life (and death) caught up with me and I just didn't have as much time to give a shit about musics, so I don't have too many favourites from the last 3-4 years.

    But off the top of my head, some of my dadtronica klassixxxx (aside from the big boys with their own subforums) would be

     

    proc fiskal insula

    bola DEG

    pritchard under the sun

     

    • Like 2
  5. If I may recommend the following series of fantastically researched videos that are mega worth a watch, like crack out a couple of six packs and strap in for an evening. I've had Ukes and Russians tell me that they learnt tonnes about their own history from watching these


    1: The Orange and Maidan revolutions and the role played by oligarch factional bullshit and its relationship to russia[n meddling]
    (That fight in the Rada halfway through this vid, I remember Tony Hawks (of Round Ireland with a Fridge fame) taking the piss out of that at the time, on his shitty show on Auntie Beeb)


    2: Girkin's fake revolution in Donbas, creeping direct russian involvement, plus good points on timescale manipulation in the media.

    Fuck, I was watching all this shit on Vice during the aphex soundcloud dump, and it's been absolutely nuts to get to know people as refugees who were there through all this at the time
    (also on this topic, I highly recommend reading "Hybrid Warriors" by Anna Arutunyan, who attempted to interview Girkin)
    (also, I lost my job at the time because of those post-MH17 sanctions lol)


    3: The way the "NATO started it" argument went from semi-plausible to total-wank, plus why Mearsheimer et al are cunts

    4: The way Iraq, and LaRouchian horseshoe-theory conspiracy nuttery, influenced Russian and far-right US thinking, and provided a lot of the ideological backdrop to the invasion

    The LaRouchian view of "colour revolutions" is absolutely central to this - Putin's utter incapability of grasping that the masses might have agency, and the LaRouchist denial of agency to the masses as a point of principle. Like, to debunk it, just talk to someone who was there FFS

    Christ, I didn't realise Glazyev was a LaRouchist until I saw this


     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  6. In the glory days of Limewire there was a chill dnb track attributed to Squarepusher called "Sarah's World", much like kickass violin solo etc

    Anyone else know it? Anyone got it?

    • Burger 1
  7. Quote

    What threats? What evidence is there that Putin wants to invade these places

    Do I really need to list examples? Start with the at least weekly threats of nuclear war against various states on primetime state TV (often made by sitting government figures). Or you could play a game where you google "Medvedev [country] tweet" to come up with a list of threats that the (drunken?) head of russia's security council has made to a broad swath of countries over the last couple of years. And to think that I used to admire the chap as fairly level-headed.

    It's not about ability, it's about intent, and knowing that they will do it when they gain the ability to. Because they say that they want to. And I don't think it will end in nuclear war, because their hybrid attacks have already demonstrably worked. That's why I find it funny that some people still care about these maps of the whole world peppered with US military bases. The material context has drastically changed. Hard power is heavily undermined in a world of troll farms and deniable PMCs. Imagine russia using twitter to conjure up an acute domestic political crisis in Lithuania and then have mysterious masked gunmen start appearing in out-of-the-way villages a la Donbas? Does Russia need to nuke anybody to take it over? Does NATO's Article 5 have any meaning at all in that situation? 

    As for georgia, the oft-overlooked point is that they were quite cuntish to their autonomous regions prior to 2008, and those vague NATO invitations were stupid. Russia's meddling there was grim but somewhat understandable.

    Quote

    Obviously the terms would not be in Ukraine's favor, but it would stop the killing

    It wouldn't, though. In exactly the same way as a Gaza ceasefire will not stop Israel from peppering civilian crowds with bullets in occupied territory whenever it pleases.

    Quote

    Call it what you will (imperialism or sphere of influence), would you rather have Russia and China be the dominant force in the east and then rest of world or the United States. That is what is at stake, and the way that America chooses to make war with Russia instead of cooperating and driving a wedge between Russia and China, is foolish and also incompetent. It creates and sustains military conflict and leeches off the material profits of these unnecessary wars.

    Not sure how any of that leads towards a more desired outcome. In some parts of the world, the decline of US imperialism would be a great thing. And if anything, russia and china being in opposing camps seems like a higher risk of nuclear war...

    Quote

    Europe has enough power collectively to challenge American policy. They are essentially America's bitch at this point, and ironically the war in Ukraine accelerated this trend especially concerning the cost of energy oil and natural gas

    Agreed and this is what infuriates me to no end. Germany's Energiewende was one of the dumbest political decisions of this century. That's what got them hooked on russian gas, and drastically constrained the political agency of Europe as a whole. I hoped Nordstream would force Europe seriously onto a path of energy independence (not to say decarbonising), but (to a first approximation anyway) it hasn't. Although another aspect of that is Russian shenanigans in a swath of Sahel states, i.e. the neo-colonies France relied on for its nuclear power. Europe has collectively failed miserably to assert itself, part by russian design but part by truly pathetic short-sightedness

    Quote

    America's sec of state just announced today that Ukraine will be a NATO member. 

    Weird to imply it's being shoved down their neck when they really want it. Whether they should want it or not is another matter, hybrid warfare is demonstrating its uselessness. I also simply don't buy the line that Russia is scared of NATO given their aforementioned mastery of hybrid power, and additionally the fact that Putin very eagerly worked alongside NATO during the War on Islam Terror - something that has been weirdly airbrushed. There were "NATO Bases" on Russian soil in the 2000s... Putin invited them there!

    • Like 4
  8. 9 hours ago, decibal cooper said:

    Washington's 'plan' is just to continue throwing money at the situation and to extend the war for as long as possible, to fight to the last dead Ukrainian. 

    I do find it funny how some of the domestic critics of yanqui imperialism are the least able to step outside of that imperalist mindset. Now I agree, the yanks are bumbling along not really knowing what their aim is. But, this isn't about America. The ukes would be fighting whether or not the yanks arm them. It'd just turn from a war into a huge insurgency.

    Quote

    You don't have shit to say about the 2022 negotiations in Istanbul and how this whole thing could have been avoided. 

    How do you think it went? Did Sleepy Joe forbid the Ze from surrendering? Do you recall the context of the negotiations - taking place just as the ukes discovered the first mass graves? When they realised what continued russian occupation of any part of the country meant for the people there? 

    Now I will say that I wouldn't be surprised if Ze was hoodwinked by Bojo's grandiose Churchillian crap. I'm sure he made promises that he couldn't keep.

    Quote

    You make it seem like they haven't already lost four oblasts that they have very little hope of retaking

    They haven't - they've lost Crimea and Luhansk, but retain large chunks of Kherson, Zap and Donetsk. Russia has never occupied Zaporizhia city, and I dread to think what kind of Gaza-like apocalypse russia would unleash if they got their mitts on the place (or Kharkiv city). 

    8 hours ago, decibal cooper said:

    All of the rhetoric painting Putin as the next Hitler on his way to conquer Europe 

    Except that that is Putin's own rhetoric.  The threats of invasion and nuclear annihilation against Poland, the Baltics, Finland, Germany, the UK, even Ireland come from he himself - the autocratic leader of the Russian state, plus his apparatchiks who he controls (Drunk Dmitri almost comically so) and the talking heads of his state-controlled media. When imperialist nutjobs make threats, they should be believed. You can hardly accuse people of vilifying Putin as some brutal monster when he openly, willingly (in front of voluntary interviews!) paints himself as one. Have you forgotten when he victim-blamed Poland for Hitler's invasion in front of an audicence of millions of braindead yanks?

    Note that the political superstructure that Putin has created, comes with built-in off-ramps. At any time he chooses, he can blame his boyars, his advisers, his ultranationalist outriders, of deceiving him or misinforming him. He could very easily and (actually semi-plausibly) blame Girkin and Malofeyev for the entire unpleasantness since 2014 (he even has Girkin in prison already). He does have options to climb down and save his own skin. But he doesn't, because this is what he wants to happen.

    5 hours ago, decibal cooper said:

    To be honest with you, I am convinced most by the American political scientist John Mearsheimer,

    The Realist viewpoint might be a passive, pragmatic endorsement of imperialism, rather than an active, enthusiastic one, but it is an endorsement of imperialism all the same. A "sphere of influence" IS imperialism. It's the same logic behind the Bay of Pigs and the Monroe Doctrine.

    It's also funny how most of the more popular commentators within that tradition are also terminally captured by yank-o-centrism; they can't comprehend that Europe might be, or could be (or should be), its own independent geopolitical entity. And it's Europe that Ukrainians want to join, it's that that caused loads of them to first rise up in 2013. Most Ukrainians were against joining NATO when (and for a long time after) Russia first invaded in 2014. 

    • Like 4
  9. On 1/31/2024 at 3:31 AM, user said:

    DJ Slipped Disc 

    holy shit that one is actually good

     

     

    DJ Detweiler

    DJ P.Eng

    DJ Mavic

    DJ Hypnodisc from Robot Wars

    DJ Harvey (MBE)

    DJ Peter Mansbridge

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.