Jump to content

cooliofranco

Members
  • Posts

    975
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cooliofranco

  1. for those unavailable at that time, someone is going to post a good quality mp3 of this right? that's not against the rules in any way, yeah?

     

    What time for east coast US?

    Edit: got it, 2pm fuck me

  2. that circular thing looks like a circular dendogram. hey OP or any photoshop pros out there capable of figuring out what the text is?

     

     

    unknown6_1.jpeg

     

    I need that shit. Also pretty pumped about the "equipment" list.

     

  3. DID YOU LEARN NOTHING FROM THE TERRIBLE EVENTS AT JURASSIC PARK?

     

    This thing could still have be done over the internet if Warp only had the technological competence to do so.

    There must be dozens of companies they could have approached who could have set it up without worrying about leaks and people copying it.

  4. why are folks taking this one seriously? it was uploaded before the announcement but couldn't the uploader just change the name to match a SYRO track after the announcement?

     

     

     

    Now this one is more intriguing because it was uploaded weeks before the announcement and is the only video on the channel.

     

    :music:

     

    Joyrex manifests his enjoyment for this fleak. What does it mean??

     

     

  5. yeah it's the atp/minehead and it's track 4. i condensed that to at/m then just atm in my head without telling anyone. heh / doh.

     

     

     

     

    jasondonervan - did you get a youtube message for the ATP/minehead track or did you not try that one?

    he did try meinhend (jason called it the atm track) and he did get a copyright notice, track 10 i think.

     

     

    Not me - coolandfrank caught that one, and it was track 4.

     

  6. are the basses in the metz and atp/minehead tracks the same bass synth? what is it? you say it is freq shaving? i appreciate it's more than just that, but what freqs do you think he's messing with? it sounds like higher and lower stuff is there but he's cutting out a lot of middle stuff but i could be totally wrong/simplistic?

     

    boils down to good mixing, essentially. shaving out frequencies. plus whatever home brewed tools he may have to facilitate that. there's a lot of gating and ducking on drukqs, suggesting a forced cohesion, plus, the guy's got the time an money to basically tool around all day with this shit. ears, trust in your working environment, and a good ear. so go figure. working with fft and spectral manipulation generally sounds pretty terrible; even the famous face in windowlicker sounds pretty good compared with amateur attempts; my thoughts? either a great and woefully underappreciated studio engineer, or he's just that good.

  7. ha ha ha

     

    What the fuck guys?!? So you got some info and it got you all distracted from the important things. This recent move is obviously a tactic to prevent the cracking of the barcode.

  8. i really hope the alleged back cover is that image. i love badgers and stencils and old doggy-slobbered and dirtied tennis balls. Hey Joyrex! Tell 'em Cool and Frank, Ph.D., really likes this image and even if the LP is boxed and ready to fly, they should make another run with this wonderfully composed still life.

  9. As site admin, can't Joyrex just snag some unused account and post with it? On the other hand, if it's Richard, and he occasionally lurks around here and posts about 311 albums, well, that's just super.

     

     

    so locustlx is the lord?

     

    it would appear so. also lol at his last post in the 311 thread.

     

  10. wait, why are we going after the barcode when we have no reason to believe the back cover is real? we haven't heard from the guy who posted it, right?

     

    seriously, why do we think it's real. joyrex hasn't confirmed it and we don't know where it's from.

     

    am i missing something?

     

     

     

    Is this a possible back cover leak? These are exciting times though for sure.

     

    http://i.imgur.com/M4BfkIJ.jpg

    where did you find this? is this the first post of this ITT? who r uuu?

     

     

    ANSWER THE QUESTION, SIR!

     

  11. I don't think music reviews are worthless but they are typically overstated and overinterpreted. Music reviewing should place the album / song in some kind of context- "this sounds like these other artists and roughly fits in this genre," give a little bio, and then get out of the way.

     

    They gave Reachy Prints a 6.0 because it didn't have Bjork on it, whatever, it's one of my favourite things I've heard this year. Make up your own mind, enjoy what you like.

  12. FWIW I think some kind of limit like, 1 new YLC thread per 50 posts is the way to go. it's not a ton of work for a mod and would prevent folks from dropping in and posting and leaving.

     

    I've seen people worry that this will lead to too many "nice track" comments which indeed aren't very helpful. then again, that kind of minimal feedback can warm the heart of the OP. but yeah, if that becomes a problem how about 1 new YLC thread / 100 words written or something like that.

     

    I worry about 1 thread/person because it'll inevitably narrow things. it's unavoidable that i and others will simply stop checking threads of users we haven't found too exciting. that's not good developing and learning i think.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.