Jump to content

YELLOW

Members
  • Posts

    1,439
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by YELLOW

  1.  

     

     

    Of course this will be leaked, most probably before most of us receive their downloading link by e-mail or very shortly after.

    The only people that would be able to leak it are joyrex, grant or richard, and the chosen guy ripping the record. You really think any of them are gonna leak it?

    why don't you just shut the fuck up and let the new kid make himself look like a twat, eh?

    Next time I will haha

  2. Had two of the best burgers I've ever had a couple weeks ago at the Boston Burger Co in, you guessed it, Boston, MA. The Mac Attack on the left was covered in mac n cheese in bacon, and the Killer Bee on the left had a stack of four beer battered onion rings, honey bbq sauce, and also bacon. They were so good. Worth the two hour drive. Definitely going back. The only pic I have is an Instagram one

     

    http://instagram.com/p/m-4vFKSSyG/

  3.  

     

     

     

    I honestly don't really think this a 'game changer' as far as music distribution goes. It's an interesting one-off for a very rare 20 year old unreleased album. But if a new Aphex Twin record came out soon, i think it would be released just like anything else on Rephlex or Warp or whatever

    but why? why do you even need a "label"? you don't any more.... used to be that the label would sort out the production, marketing, PR and distribution of the record, but you don't need a label to do that any more. all you need to do is supply some source material and (if you have a big enough following) the fan base will do the rest - from production of a physical release (if that's what people want) to artwork and marketing via social media. what do labels actually do really? where do they add value? these are rhetorical questions btw, just trying to get people thinking about this concept... i personally believe a label is pretty much exactly what it says on the tin - a label for music; a brand, a logo, an image etc. maybe that's not as important as it used to be...or maybe it should never have been important in the first place - after all it should be the actual sound you listen to that creates the image/brand/label etc... i dunno, not saying i'm right, but think it throws up some interesting questions about the whole industry and the traditional model.

    I agree with 2WV

    Labels are becoming a thing of the past. With things like bandcamp and soundcloud being used rapidly to self-release music, there's no need for labels anymore. Going it alone can be difficult though unless you write very well produced music that has a large fanbase already behind it that is constantly looking for new musicians within that style of music.

     

    I think the internet is vastly becoming a means to bolster the individual and their creativity. Every now and then I come across some soundcloud pages of some really obscure musicians yet somehow they receive thousands of plays of their work.

     

    It seems to me that playing live will be the real money-maker for bands/musicians in the future.

    Very valid points and actually I just remembered how the My Bloody Valentine album came out last year without the help of a label and that seemed to work pretty well. At least if the hype is there.

     

    I guess I just don't see Kickstarter as the game changer for music releases. It makes sense in this case, crowd sourcing to purchase a very expensive, very rare test pressing

  4.  

     

     

     

    so who is this doing the transfer?

    At this point I have three facilities I am considering (two recommended by Grant - guys who were originally part of the "Porky Prime Cuts" crew, and the outfit x_y politics recommended - it's looking likely we'll end up using the x_y politics recommended one (Grant is impressed by his equipment/setup).

     

    Here's some interesting statistics from the Kickstarter dashboard:

    forum.watmm.com External 253 14.94% $4,205.50

    Direct traffic (no referrer information) External 232 13.40% $3,772

    theverge.com External 224 13.26% $3,731.84

    Search Kickstarter 128 7.31% $2,058

    factmag.com External 127 7.20% $2,027

    Facebook External 107 6.15% $1,729

    pitchfork.com External 80 4.63% $1,303.01

    Twitter External 62 3.57% $1,006

    Embedded widget External 53 3.12% $879

    xlr8r.com External 46 2.70% $759.50

    disquiet.gizmodo.com External 39 2.27% $638

    residentadvisor.net External 36 2.06% $580

    mobile.theverge.com External 36 2.05% $576

    reddit.com External 32 1.85% $521

    m.pitchfork.com External 32 1.83% $516

    Advanced Discovery Kickstarter 31 1.90% $534

    google.com External 21 1.17% $329

    Home popular Kickstarter 20 1.14% $320

    feedly.com External 18 1.02% $288

    jaykogami.com External 14 0.81% $229

    google.co.uk External 12 0.68% $192

    crackajack.de External 9 0.55% $154

    consequenceofsound.net External 8 0.45% $128

    ninjatune.net External 6 0.34% $96

    spotlight-jp.com External 6 0.34% $96

    Cue 'We Are The Champions'

    tumblr_miazecVM8q1r3ifxzo1_500.gif

    1000 WATMM points. Top lel

  5.  

     

    so who is this doing the transfer?

    At this point I have three facilities I am considering (two recommended by Grant - guys who were originally part of the "Porky Prime Cuts" crew, and the outfit x_y politics recommended - it's looking likely we'll end up using the x_y politics recommended one (Grant is impressed by his equipment/setup).

     

    Here's some interesting statistics from the Kickstarter dashboard:

    forum.watmm.com External 253 14.94% $4,205.50

    Direct traffic (no referrer information) External 232 13.40% $3,772

    theverge.com External 224 13.26% $3,731.84

    Search Kickstarter 128 7.31% $2,058

    factmag.com External 127 7.20% $2,027

    Facebook External 107 6.15% $1,729

    pitchfork.com External 80 4.63% $1,303.01

    Twitter External 62 3.57% $1,006

    Embedded widget External 53 3.12% $879

    xlr8r.com External 46 2.70% $759.50

    disquiet.gizmodo.com External 39 2.27% $638

    residentadvisor.net External 36 2.06% $580

    mobile.theverge.com External 36 2.05% $576

    reddit.com External 32 1.85% $521

    m.pitchfork.com External 32 1.83% $516

    Advanced Discovery Kickstarter 31 1.90% $534

    google.com External 21 1.17% $329

    Home popular Kickstarter 20 1.14% $320

    feedly.com External 18 1.02% $288

    jaykogami.com External 14 0.81% $229

    google.co.uk External 12 0.68% $192

    crackajack.de External 9 0.55% $154

    consequenceofsound.net External 8 0.45% $128

    ninjatune.net External 6 0.34% $96

    spotlight-jp.com External 6 0.34% $96

    Cue 'We Are The Champions'

  6. Apologies if this has already been asked on this thread or somewhere deep in the other but it's not answered by the FAQ. What happens if the kickstarter isn't accepted by kickstarter?

     

    Their guidelines say:

     

     

    • Kickstarter cannot be used to raise money for causes, whether it's the Red Cross or a scholarship, or for "fund my life" projects, like tuition or bills.

    • Creators cannot offer equity or financial incentives (ownership, share of profits, repayment/loans, cash-value equivalents, etc).

    • Projects cannot resell items or offer rewards not produced by the project or its creator.

    • Creators cannot promise to donate a portion of funds raised or future revenue to a cause.

    Obviously the stuff about donating money raised from ebay to a cause, the promise of also giving some of that money to backers fall foul of the second item. And the reselling items not produced by the project creator is another potential grey area. Is there a backup idea if the Kickstarter application is denied?

    Already been approved by them. #readthread

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.