maitake Posted July 14, 2015 Author Share Posted July 14, 2015 My experience is that lower latency is easier to achieve on linux distros than Windows.. Can't speak for OSX. Just check out the RT/Low Lat kernels :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xfxf Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 iirc the rt patches for the kernel are heavily an x86/x86-64 architecture thing, not as well supported on powerpc. modey with an old g3 I'd be running OS 9 and music apps from that era, trying to get modern Linux music apps running on it will probably be more pain then gain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modey Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 yeah, maybe you're right. someone wrote a super accurate protracker clone that is available for powerpc macs so I might just install that on it. My experience is that lower latency is easier to achieve on linux distros than Windows.. Can't speak for OSX. Just check out the RT/Low Lat kernels :) OSX is low latency out of the box, essentially. Can't really compete with that I guess! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maitake Posted July 14, 2015 Author Share Posted July 14, 2015 yeah, maybe you're right. someone wrote a super accurate protracker clone that is available for powerpc macs so I might just install that on it. My experience is that lower latency is easier to achieve on linux distros than Windows.. Can't speak for OSX. Just check out the RT/Low Lat kernels :) OSX is low latency out of the box, essentially. Can't really compete with that I guess! That's good to hear. Stubborn perhaps, but I still consider OSX a *nix OS :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.