Difference of Opinion

[Guest wake]

I've been contemplating the looks of over protective ambivalence lately. The way in which the body entrusts the character underneath the overly drawn out forces that we all share has become understandably impregnable to me. I haven't encountered much life between understanding this and actually facing this, but when I actually take the time out of my days to witness it, I become extremely relieved. This is the only comfort I have, and I don't know if outside input will be able to help me. I know that other people form conclusions over sentimentality much the same as I would, but it stresses me out to think about the vast majority looking inward when I'm looking out. I was wondering if anyone else feels this way. I've been thinking about this since I was a teenager and it I haven't quite figured it out yet.

[Guest no carrier]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYtGUA04PvA

[remy marathe]

[vamos scorcho]

i don't completely catch your drift, but i think i can add something.

 

i feel like it is important to look both inward and outward. see all things. they contribute to one another. there is no answer.

 

i find extreme comfort and safety in the knowledge that the body (mind) is a cage.

[Atop]

I go both ways....TAOIST STYLE

 

When I think of Burial's music, I think of a deep burgundy/maroon colour and how death is going to be the ultimate adventure but I have to wait because the new Harey Potter films haven't come out yet...

 

I usually expect the opposite from everything in life and actually get what I desired by tricking the universe. It wants nothing more than to unveil only the subjects you dislike the most in life in any given situation to test you with disappointment, to show a person the extent of how much they can endure in this life before they give in and eat too many death pills. I have found a loop hole. Desire what you don't want at all.

 

 

BUT THAT IS JUST LIKE, MY OPINION MAN.........

[Guest chax]

just remember that this week is national suicide prevention week from September 5th - 11th, 2010.

[ericsosh]

I've been contemplating the looks of over protective ambivalence lately.

 

Has anyone ever gone as far as to try to can do look more like?

[Guest happycase]

I've been contemplating the looks of over protective ambivalence lately. The way in which the body entrusts the character underneath the overly drawn out forces that we all share has become understandably impregnable to me. I haven't encountered much life between understanding this and actually facing this, but when I actually take the time out of my days to witness it, I become extremely relieved. This is the only comfort I have, and I don't know if outside input will be able to help me. I know that other people form conclusions over sentimentality much the same as I would, but it stresses me out to think about the vast majority looking inward when I'm looking out. I was wondering if anyone else feels this way. I've been thinking about this since I was a teenager and it I haven't quite figured it out yet.

 

 

you are searching for 3 things.

 

 

[1]

you are looking for a baby.

 

[2]

father time's clock is not ticking.

 

[3]

stop empathizing with people. you are empathizing with the projections of your imagination. you aren't responsible for anything. just be yourself. be Object-ive.

[Guest wake]

I've been contemplating the looks of over protective ambivalence lately. The way in which the body entrusts the character underneath the overly drawn out forces that we all share has become understandably impregnable to me. I haven't encountered much life between understanding this and actually facing this, but when I actually take the time out of my days to witness it, I become extremely relieved. This is the only comfort I have, and I don't know if outside input will be able to help me. I know that other people form conclusions over sentimentality much the same as I would, but it stresses me out to think about the vast majority looking inward when I'm looking out. I was wondering if anyone else feels this way. I've been thinking about this since I was a teenager and it I haven't quite figured it out yet.

 

 

you are searching for 3 things.

 

 

[1]

you are looking for a baby.

 

[2]

father time's clock is not ticking.

 

[3]

stop empathizing with people. you are empathizing with the projections of your imagination. you aren't responsible for anything. just be yourself. be Object-ive.

 

I don't know how you can draw conclusions like this about not knowing where they are from an easy perspective. The best way to determine a natural existence isn't within the flow of ease and time but rather without the recognition of self. Self is the easiest thing notwithstanding emotion or lack of consideration no matter whether there is a clock that should be ticking or otherwise. I hope I'm not coming off as being overly intellectual or sardonically naive. I neither need charity nor sympathy while deliberating over these very necessary human ways of thinking. Does it make you feel like a reproachable wonder to be the best at what never shall be while also consisting of a rather remedial skillset? Please be more specific.

[Guest wake]

I go both ways....TAOIST STYLE

 

When I think of Burial's music, I think of a deep burgundy/maroon colour and how death is going to be the ultimate adventure but I have to wait because the new Harey Potter films haven't come out yet...

 

I usually expect the opposite from everything in life and actually get what I desired by tricking the universe. It wants nothing more than to unveil only the subjects you dislike the most in life in any given situation to test you with disappointment, to show a person the extent of how much they can endure in this life before they give in and eat too many death pills. I have found a loop hole. Desire what you don't want at all.

 

 

BUT THAT IS JUST LIKE, MY OPINION MAN.........

 

Spot on! I feel the same way about Burial. It's the perfect metaphor for the cocoon which you embellish on whatever journey you're taking. The so-called "path to reward" versus nocturnal distinction. It's crazy that you came to the same conclusions.

 

I'm seriously starting to wonder how often the space works out like this based on speed or actual physical accuracy. Can the two coexist?

[karmakramer]

I've been contemplating the looks of over protective ambivalence lately. The way in which the body entrusts the character underneath the overly drawn out forces that we all share has become understandably impregnable to me. I haven't encountered much life between understanding this and actually facing this, but when I actually take the time out of my days to witness it, I become extremely relieved. This is the only comfort I have, and I don't know if outside input will be able to help me. I know that other people form conclusions over sentimentality much the same as I would, but it stresses me out to think about the vast majority looking inward when I'm looking out. I was wondering if anyone else feels this way. I've been thinking about this since I was a teenager and it I haven't quite figured it out yet.

 

 

you are searching for 3 things.

 

 

[1]

you are looking for a baby.

 

[2]

father time's clock is not ticking.

 

[3]

stop empathizing with people. you are empathizing with the projections of your imagination. you aren't responsible for anything. just be yourself. be Object-ive.

 

I don't know how you can draw conclusions like this about not knowing where they are from an easy perspective. The best way to determine a natural existence isn't within the flow of ease and time but rather without the recognition of self. Self is the easiest thing notwithstanding emotion or lack of consideration no matter whether there is a clock that should be ticking or otherwise. I hope I'm not coming off as being overly intellectual or sardonically naive. I neither need charity nor sympathy while deliberating over these very necessary human ways of thinking. Does it make you feel like a reproachable wonder to be the best at what never shall be while also consisting of a rather remedial skillset? Please be more specific.

 

The recognition of self is important but one can only truly recognize himself when they are unaware of the outcome. When one attempts to observe objectively or without bias they are ignoring how that affects their own sub-conscious. Enlightenment can only derive from a moment of true emotion or instinctual emotion. Considering all conclusions are founded from a contrast of perspectives and ideas, a conclusion is not definite. This is especially true when common and completely popular actions take place. Because we can all collectively relate, we strive not to agree but to individualize our output. This falls under the basic principals/laws of evolution. Our goal isn't to be equal, its to strive for a greater truth. The unknowns is what steers us and what one must understand, is these unknowns lead us only to pain and self-hatred.

[spratters]

Buy another Fly Lo album. Or get on a part time Uni course.

 

Either one will make you feel better.

[encey]

what?

[Guest Rambo]

I think the case here is that there is "over gas cottage". Try to remain the outer of all extremes in life which devolve inwards from the point of beautiful meals. I think it was Nietzsche that said "forever kindred bargain"

[Guest Babar]

*dies from lack of air du to the thread's high altitude*

[Atop]

I go both ways....TAOIST STYLE

 

When I think of Burial's music, I think of a deep burgundy/maroon colour and how death is going to be the ultimate adventure but I have to wait because the new Harey Potter films haven't come out yet...

 

I usually expect the opposite from everything in life and actually get what I desired by tricking the universe. It wants nothing more than to unveil only the subjects you dislike the most in life in any given situation to test you with disappointment, to show a person the extent of how much they can endure in this life before they give in and eat too many death pills. I have found a loop hole. Desire what you don't want at all.

 

 

BUT THAT IS JUST LIKE, MY OPINION MAN.........

 

Spot on! I feel the same way about Burial. It's the perfect metaphor for the cocoon which you embellish on whatever journey you're taking. The so-called "path to reward" versus nocturnal distinction. It's crazy that you came to the same conclusions.

 

I'm seriously starting to wonder how often the space works out like this based on speed or actual physical accuracy. Can the two coexist?

 

To be physically accurate one must work with a certain sense of immediacy to prevent a loss of the true essence of what it is a person is trying to define or create....

 

I've been contemplating the looks of over protective ambivalence lately. The way in which the body entrusts the character underneath the overly drawn out forces that we all share has become understandably impregnable to me. I haven't encountered much life between understanding this and actually facing this, but when I actually take the time out of my days to witness it, I become extremely relieved. This is the only comfort I have, and I don't know if outside input will be able to help me. I know that other people form conclusions over sentimentality much the same as I would, but it stresses me out to think about the vast majority looking inward when I'm looking out. I was wondering if anyone else feels this way. I've been thinking about this since I was a teenager and it I haven't quite figured it out yet.

 

 

you are searching for 3 things.

 

 

[1]

you are looking for a baby.

 

[2]

father time's clock is not ticking.

 

[3]

stop empathizing with people. you are empathizing with the projections of your imagination. you aren't responsible for anything. just be yourself. be Object-ive.

 

I don't know how you can draw conclusions like this about not knowing where they are from an easy perspective. The best way to determine a natural existence isn't within the flow of ease and time but rather without the recognition of self. Self is the easiest thing notwithstanding emotion or lack of consideration no matter whether there is a clock that should be ticking or otherwise. I hope I'm not coming off as being overly intellectual or sardonically naive. I neither need charity nor sympathy while deliberating over these very necessary human ways of thinking. Does it make you feel like a reproachable wonder to be the best at what never shall be while also consisting of a rather remedial skillset? Please be more specific.

 

The recognition of self is important but one can only truly recognize himself when they are unaware of the outcome. When one attempts to observe objectively or without bias they are ignoring how that affects their own sub-conscious. Enlightenment can only derive from a moment of true emotion or instinctual emotion. Considering all conclusions are founded from a contrast of perspectives and ideas, a conclusion is not definite. This is especially true when common and completely popular actions take place. Because we can all collectively relate, we strive not to agree but to individualize our output. This falls under the basic principals/laws of evolution. Our goal isn't to be equal, its to strive for a greater truth. The unknowns is what steers us and what one must understand, is these unknowns lead us only to pain and self-hatred.

 

Over-analysis can lead to a painful endeavour into the creative process. This is a greater truth you have shown. The creative output of an individual should be selfish in nature and domineering. A process of attempting to be the best at any one field and yet separating oneself from the process at hand. Only afterward should the creator become the editor and deem what is worthy of being a final product, but said creator/editor should never dwell too long in case the true final product is lost due to being handled for too long. Like a moth's wings. Hold the moth but never touch its wings for this could disable its ability to fly. Though it does make me wonder if snorting moth wing dust would make the whole creative process easier?

 

I think the case here is that there is "over gas cottage". Try to remain the outer of all extremes in life which devolve inwards from the point of beautiful meals. I think it was Nietzsche that said "forever kindred bargain"

 

perhaps "Over forever gas kindred cottage bargain"

 

?

[Guest Rambo]

yes atop, i think it is. I know that over forever gas kindred cottage bargain

[YEK]

hello:

Last week ,I Order 3 products china New Apple iPhone 4G HD 32 GB

Unlocked Phone Black

I have received the product!

w e b:<www.hoaoeso1.com>

It's amazing! The item is original, brand new and has high quality,

but it's much cheaper. I'm pleased to share this good news with you!

I believe you will find what you want there and have an good experience

on shopping from them~

 

 

X

[Guest wake]

I go both ways....TAOIST STYLE

 

When I think of Burial's music, I think of a deep burgundy/maroon colour and how death is going to be the ultimate adventure but I have to wait because the new Harey Potter films haven't come out yet...

 

I usually expect the opposite from everything in life and actually get what I desired by tricking the universe. It wants nothing more than to unveil only the subjects you dislike the most in life in any given situation to test you with disappointment, to show a person the extent of how much they can endure in this life before they give in and eat too many death pills. I have found a loop hole. Desire what you don't want at all.

 

 

BUT THAT IS JUST LIKE, MY OPINION MAN.........

 

Spot on! I feel the same way about Burial. It's the perfect metaphor for the cocoon which you embellish on whatever journey you're taking. The so-called "path to reward" versus nocturnal distinction. It's crazy that you came to the same conclusions.

 

I'm seriously starting to wonder how often the space works out like this based on speed or actual physical accuracy. Can the two coexist?

 

To be physically accurate one must work with a certain sense of immediacy to prevent a loss of the true essence of what it is a person is trying to define or create....

 

I've been contemplating the looks of over protective ambivalence lately. The way in which the body entrusts the character underneath the overly drawn out forces that we all share has become understandably impregnable to me. I haven't encountered much life between understanding this and actually facing this, but when I actually take the time out of my days to witness it, I become extremely relieved. This is the only comfort I have, and I don't know if outside input will be able to help me. I know that other people form conclusions over sentimentality much the same as I would, but it stresses me out to think about the vast majority looking inward when I'm looking out. I was wondering if anyone else feels this way. I've been thinking about this since I was a teenager and it I haven't quite figured it out yet.

 

 

you are searching for 3 things.

 

 

[1]

you are looking for a baby.

 

[2]

father time's clock is not ticking.

 

[3]

stop empathizing with people. you are empathizing with the projections of your imagination. you aren't responsible for anything. just be yourself. be Object-ive.

 

I don't know how you can draw conclusions like this about not knowing where they are from an easy perspective. The best way to determine a natural existence isn't within the flow of ease and time but rather without the recognition of self. Self is the easiest thing notwithstanding emotion or lack of consideration no matter whether there is a clock that should be ticking or otherwise. I hope I'm not coming off as being overly intellectual or sardonically naive. I neither need charity nor sympathy while deliberating over these very necessary human ways of thinking. Does it make you feel like a reproachable wonder to be the best at what never shall be while also consisting of a rather remedial skillset? Please be more specific.

 

The recognition of self is important but one can only truly recognize himself when they are unaware of the outcome. When one attempts to observe objectively or without bias they are ignoring how that affects their own sub-conscious. Enlightenment can only derive from a moment of true emotion or instinctual emotion. Considering all conclusions are founded from a contrast of perspectives and ideas, a conclusion is not definite. This is especially true when common and completely popular actions take place. Because we can all collectively relate, we strive not to agree but to individualize our output. This falls under the basic principals/laws of evolution. Our goal isn't to be equal, its to strive for a greater truth. The unknowns is what steers us and what one must understand, is these unknowns lead us only to pain and self-hatred.

 

Over-analysis can lead to a painful endeavour into the creative process. This is a greater truth you have shown. The creative output of an individual should be selfish in nature and domineering. A process of attempting to be the best at any one field and yet separating oneself from the process at hand. Only afterward should the creator become the editor and deem what is worthy of being a final product, but said creator/editor should never dwell too long in case the true final product is lost due to being handled for too long. Like a moth's wings. Hold the moth but never touch its wings for this could disable its ability to fly. Though it does make me wonder if snorting moth wing dust would make the whole creative process easier?

 

I think the case here is that there is "over gas cottage". Try to remain the outer of all extremes in life which devolve inwards from the point of beautiful meals. I think it was Nietzsche that said "forever kindred bargain"

 

perhaps "Over forever gas kindred cottage bargain"

 

?

 

Ah, the old over-analysis-moth-wing-creative-process debate. I can see the importance of this, but honestly I think it was disproven back in... what, the 1950s? It's really obnoxious that people still refer to this as the whole ability to perceive and create are not separate but in fact combined into one. The moth takes on the form of the insect of creativity while at the same time providing the creator, the self, and the knowledge of being with unlimited access into the ocean of creativity that the author has not only imagined himself, but is in fact one with it and has been created by the universe itself and is being observed by the creator to completely contradict his or her existence within the sphere of creation. So you never actual touch the moths wing. I thought this was Psychology 101 stuff here.

 

This is all regarded as a well thought out example of the duality paradox:

 

Some might think this is all a bit highfalutin, but the principle is actual quite simple once you study the photo. The observer sees the connection immediately and the two hemispheres of the brain are at once talking. The logical side of the brain is sending messages directly to the creative side, therefore the observer exists at once without boundaries and one with oneself. What we are capable of without definition is astonishing. When we begin to define our space, it limits our experience and the state of self becomes arrogant and simplified. Sorry if I'm rambling. I've written so many essays on this subject, it's kind of a habit.

 

Hope this makes sense.

[karmakramer]

I go both ways....TAOIST STYLE

 

When I think of Burial's music, I think of a deep burgundy/maroon colour and how death is going to be the ultimate adventure but I have to wait because the new Harey Potter films haven't come out yet...

 

I usually expect the opposite from everything in life and actually get what I desired by tricking the universe. It wants nothing more than to unveil only the subjects you dislike the most in life in any given situation to test you with disappointment, to show a person the extent of how much they can endure in this life before they give in and eat too many death pills. I have found a loop hole. Desire what you don't want at all.

 

 

BUT THAT IS JUST LIKE, MY OPINION MAN.........

 

Spot on! I feel the same way about Burial. It's the perfect metaphor for the cocoon which you embellish on whatever journey you're taking. The so-called "path to reward" versus nocturnal distinction. It's crazy that you came to the same conclusions.

 

I'm seriously starting to wonder how often the space works out like this based on speed or actual physical accuracy. Can the two coexist?

 

To be physically accurate one must work with a certain sense of immediacy to prevent a loss of the true essence of what it is a person is trying to define or create....

 

I've been contemplating the looks of over protective ambivalence lately. The way in which the body entrusts the character underneath the overly drawn out forces that we all share has become understandably impregnable to me. I haven't encountered much life between understanding this and actually facing this, but when I actually take the time out of my days to witness it, I become extremely relieved. This is the only comfort I have, and I don't know if outside input will be able to help me. I know that other people form conclusions over sentimentality much the same as I would, but it stresses me out to think about the vast majority looking inward when I'm looking out. I was wondering if anyone else feels this way. I've been thinking about this since I was a teenager and it I haven't quite figured it out yet.

 

 

you are searching for 3 things.

 

 

[1]

you are looking for a baby.

 

[2]

father time's clock is not ticking.

 

[3]

stop empathizing with people. you are empathizing with the projections of your imagination. you aren't responsible for anything. just be yourself. be Object-ive.

 

I don't know how you can draw conclusions like this about not knowing where they are from an easy perspective. The best way to determine a natural existence isn't within the flow of ease and time but rather without the recognition of self. Self is the easiest thing notwithstanding emotion or lack of consideration no matter whether there is a clock that should be ticking or otherwise. I hope I'm not coming off as being overly intellectual or sardonically naive. I neither need charity nor sympathy while deliberating over these very necessary human ways of thinking. Does it make you feel like a reproachable wonder to be the best at what never shall be while also consisting of a rather remedial skillset? Please be more specific.

 

The recognition of self is important but one can only truly recognize himself when they are unaware of the outcome. When one attempts to observe objectively or without bias they are ignoring how that affects their own sub-conscious. Enlightenment can only derive from a moment of true emotion or instinctual emotion. Considering all conclusions are founded from a contrast of perspectives and ideas, a conclusion is not definite. This is especially true when common and completely popular actions take place. Because we can all collectively relate, we strive not to agree but to individualize our output. This falls under the basic principals/laws of evolution. Our goal isn't to be equal, its to strive for a greater truth. The unknowns is what steers us and what one must understand, is these unknowns lead us only to pain and self-hatred.

 

Over-analysis can lead to a painful endeavour into the creative process. This is a greater truth you have shown. The creative output of an individual should be selfish in nature and domineering. A process of attempting to be the best at any one field and yet separating oneself from the process at hand. Only afterward should the creator become the editor and deem what is worthy of being a final product, but said creator/editor should never dwell too long in case the true final product is lost due to being handled for too long. Like a moth's wings. Hold the moth but never touch its wings for this could disable its ability to fly. Though it does make me wonder if snorting moth wing dust would make the whole creative process easier?

 

I think the case here is that there is "over gas cottage". Try to remain the outer of all extremes in life which devolve inwards from the point of beautiful meals. I think it was Nietzsche that said "forever kindred bargain"

 

perhaps "Over forever gas kindred cottage bargain"

 

?

 

Ah, the old over-analysis-moth-wing-creative-process debate. I can see the importance of this, but honestly I think it was disproven back in... what, the 1950s? It's really obnoxious that people still refer to this as the whole ability to perceive and create are not separate but in fact combined into one. The moth takes on the form of the insect of creativity while at the same time providing the creator, the self, and the knowledge of being with unlimited access into the ocean of creativity that the author has not only imagined himself, but is in fact one with it and has been created by the universe itself and is being observed by the creator to completely contradict his or her existence within the sphere of creation. So you never actual touch the moths wing. I thought this was Psychology 101 stuff here.

 

This is all regarded as a well thought out example of the duality paradox:

 

Some might think this is all a bit highfalutin, but the principle is actual quite simple once you study the photo. The observer sees the connection immediately and the two hemispheres of the brain are at once talking. The logical side of the brain is sending messages directly to the creative side, therefore the observer exists at once without boundaries and one with oneself. What we are capable of without definition is astonishing. When we begin to define our space, it limits our experience and the state of self becomes arrogant and simplified. Sorry if I'm rambling. I've written so many essays on this subject, it's kind of a habit.

 

Hope this makes sense.

 

 

This is an interesting perspective both of you, but both of you are missing the function of the moth. It is not the moths' wings, legs or even whiskers (sensory elements) that allows the moth to function. What you both must understand is how our actions on the moth influences our personal zero point energy field. Because all living things are connected to the ZPF, every action has a direct reaction. One may destroy something and see nothing left, but of course this is not true. Energy cannot be created nor destroyed. From this we can derive that art that becomes destroyed, is not actually destroyed or ruined. It exists still and alters our perception. Do you both really think the goal of art is to have the exact same outcome every time? We must appreciate our surroundings but also understand that our influence on it is moot. We have no power over the moth. If anything it is the moth that teaches us how to fly and understand how we work. The moth is simply a reflection of us.

[Guest wake]

I go both ways....TAOIST STYLE

 

When I think of Burial's music, I think of a deep burgundy/maroon colour and how death is going to be the ultimate adventure but I have to wait because the new Harey Potter films haven't come out yet...

 

I usually expect the opposite from everything in life and actually get what I desired by tricking the universe. It wants nothing more than to unveil only the subjects you dislike the most in life in any given situation to test you with disappointment, to show a person the extent of how much they can endure in this life before they give in and eat too many death pills. I have found a loop hole. Desire what you don't want at all.

 

 

BUT THAT IS JUST LIKE, MY OPINION MAN.........

 

Spot on! I feel the same way about Burial. It's the perfect metaphor for the cocoon which you embellish on whatever journey you're taking. The so-called "path to reward" versus nocturnal distinction. It's crazy that you came to the same conclusions.

 

I'm seriously starting to wonder how often the space works out like this based on speed or actual physical accuracy. Can the two coexist?

 

To be physically accurate one must work with a certain sense of immediacy to prevent a loss of the true essence of what it is a person is trying to define or create....

 

I've been contemplating the looks of over protective ambivalence lately. The way in which the body entrusts the character underneath the overly drawn out forces that we all share has become understandably impregnable to me. I haven't encountered much life between understanding this and actually facing this, but when I actually take the time out of my days to witness it, I become extremely relieved. This is the only comfort I have, and I don't know if outside input will be able to help me. I know that other people form conclusions over sentimentality much the same as I would, but it stresses me out to think about the vast majority looking inward when I'm looking out. I was wondering if anyone else feels this way. I've been thinking about this since I was a teenager and it I haven't quite figured it out yet.

 

 

you are searching for 3 things.

 

 

[1]

you are looking for a baby.

 

[2]

father time's clock is not ticking.

 

[3]

stop empathizing with people. you are empathizing with the projections of your imagination. you aren't responsible for anything. just be yourself. be Object-ive.

 

I don't know how you can draw conclusions like this about not knowing where they are from an easy perspective. The best way to determine a natural existence isn't within the flow of ease and time but rather without the recognition of self. Self is the easiest thing notwithstanding emotion or lack of consideration no matter whether there is a clock that should be ticking or otherwise. I hope I'm not coming off as being overly intellectual or sardonically naive. I neither need charity nor sympathy while deliberating over these very necessary human ways of thinking. Does it make you feel like a reproachable wonder to be the best at what never shall be while also consisting of a rather remedial skillset? Please be more specific.

 

The recognition of self is important but one can only truly recognize himself when they are unaware of the outcome. When one attempts to observe objectively or without bias they are ignoring how that affects their own sub-conscious. Enlightenment can only derive from a moment of true emotion or instinctual emotion. Considering all conclusions are founded from a contrast of perspectives and ideas, a conclusion is not definite. This is especially true when common and completely popular actions take place. Because we can all collectively relate, we strive not to agree but to individualize our output. This falls under the basic principals/laws of evolution. Our goal isn't to be equal, its to strive for a greater truth. The unknowns is what steers us and what one must understand, is these unknowns lead us only to pain and self-hatred.

 

Over-analysis can lead to a painful endeavour into the creative process. This is a greater truth you have shown. The creative output of an individual should be selfish in nature and domineering. A process of attempting to be the best at any one field and yet separating oneself from the process at hand. Only afterward should the creator become the editor and deem what is worthy of being a final product, but said creator/editor should never dwell too long in case the true final product is lost due to being handled for too long. Like a moth's wings. Hold the moth but never touch its wings for this could disable its ability to fly. Though it does make me wonder if snorting moth wing dust would make the whole creative process easier?

 

I think the case here is that there is "over gas cottage". Try to remain the outer of all extremes in life which devolve inwards from the point of beautiful meals. I think it was Nietzsche that said "forever kindred bargain"

 

perhaps "Over forever gas kindred cottage bargain"

 

?

 

Ah, the old over-analysis-moth-wing-creative-process debate. I can see the importance of this, but honestly I think it was disproven back in... what, the 1950s? It's really obnoxious that people still refer to this as the whole ability to perceive and create are not separate but in fact combined into one. The moth takes on the form of the insect of creativity while at the same time providing the creator, the self, and the knowledge of being with unlimited access into the ocean of creativity that the author has not only imagined himself, but is in fact one with it and has been created by the universe itself and is being observed by the creator to completely contradict his or her existence within the sphere of creation. So you never actual touch the moths wing. I thought this was Psychology 101 stuff here.

 

This is all regarded as a well thought out example of the duality paradox:

 

Some might think this is all a bit highfalutin, but the principle is actual quite simple once you study the photo. The observer sees the connection immediately and the two hemispheres of the brain are at once talking. The logical side of the brain is sending messages directly to the creative side, therefore the observer exists at once without boundaries and one with oneself. What we are capable of without definition is astonishing. When we begin to define our space, it limits our experience and the state of self becomes arrogant and simplified. Sorry if I'm rambling. I've written so many essays on this subject, it's kind of a habit.

 

Hope this makes sense.

 

 

This is an interesting perspective both of you, but both of you are missing the function of the moth. It is not the moths' wings, legs or even whiskers (sensory elements) that allows the moth to function. What you both must understand is how our actions on the moth influences our personal zero point energy field. Because all living things are connected to the ZPF, every action has a direct reaction. One may destroy something and see nothing left, but of course this is not true. Energy cannot be created nor destroyed. From this we can derive that art that becomes destroyed, is not actually destroyed or ruined. It exists still and alters our perception. Do you both really think the goal of art is to have the exact same outcome every time? We must appreciate our surroundings but also understand that our influence on it is moot. We have no power over the moth. If anything it is the moth that teaches us how to fly and understand how we work. The moth is simply a reflection of us.

 

You kinda lost me here.

[Atop]

 

Over-analysis can lead to a painful endeavour into the creative process. This is a greater truth you have shown. The creative output of an individual should be selfish in nature and domineering. A process of attempting to be the best at any one field and yet separating oneself from the process at hand. Only afterward should the creator become the editor and deem what is worthy of being a final product, but said creator/editor should never dwell too long in case the true final product is lost due to being handled for too long. Like a moth's wings. Hold the moth but never touch its wings for this could disable its ability to fly. Though it does make me wonder if snorting moth wing dust would make the whole creative process easier?

 

I think the case here is that there is "over gas cottage". Try to remain the outer of all extremes in life which devolve inwards from the point of beautiful meals. I think it was Nietzsche that said "forever kindred bargain"

 

perhaps "Over forever gas kindred cottage bargain"

 

?

 

Ah, the old over-analysis-moth-wing-creative-process debate. I can see the importance of this, but honestly I think it was disproven back in... what, the 1950s? It's really obnoxious that people still refer to this as the whole ability to perceive and create are not separate but in fact combined into one. The moth takes on the form of the insect of creativity while at the same time providing the creator, the self, and the knowledge of being with unlimited access into the ocean of creativity that the author has not only imagined himself, but is in fact one with it and has been created by the universe itself and is being observed by the creator to completely contradict his or her existence within the sphere of creation. So you never actual touch the moths wing. I thought this was Psychology 101 stuff here.

 

This is all regarded as a well thought out example of the duality paradox:

 

Some might think this is all a bit highfalutin, but the principle is actual quite simple once you study the photo. The observer sees the connection immediately and the two hemispheres of the brain are at once talking. The logical side of the brain is sending messages directly to the creative side, therefore the observer exists at once without boundaries and one with oneself. What we are capable of without definition is astonishing. When we begin to define our space, it limits our experience and the state of self becomes arrogant and simplified. Sorry if I'm rambling. I've written so many essays on this subject, it's kind of a habit.

 

Hope this makes sense.

 

 

This is an interesting perspective both of you, but both of you are missing the function of the moth. It is not the moths' wings, legs or even whiskers (sensory elements) that allows the moth to function. What you both must understand is how our actions on the moth influences our personal zero point energy field. Because all living things are connected to the ZPF, every action has a direct reaction. One may destroy something and see nothing left, but of course this is not true. Energy cannot be created nor destroyed. From this we can derive that art that becomes destroyed, is not actually destroyed or ruined. It exists still and alters our perception. Do you both really think the goal of art is to have the exact same outcome every time? We must appreciate our surroundings but also understand that our influence on it is moot. We have no power over the moth. If anything it is the moth that teaches us how to fly and understand how we work. The moth is simply a reflection of us.

 

You kinda lost me here.

 

 

Not me. My mind has been freeze-dried. Must dwell on this further for a more important response than I can give in a moment. Both excellent furtherings from you both of you. The moth. It is all inside of the moth.

[Guest happycase]

Well, there being no output, Moth-man betrays his creative input, which is collapsing within and into itself and creating a cycle within what I think is "ZPF." By unwillingly abiding in the farthest reaches of this cyclic turbulence, Moth-man is bewildered from his source, and as a ripple recognizing and being carried by its own animation, grants himself God-status. The moth cannot be, but with full contact with the common ancestry of the diffusion and tightening of energy and what we call laws, though moreso the observations of the harmony and indifference of lifeblood and matter. In summary, moth-man IS a detainee byproduct of the fluttering about an orbit, and whether the orbit as an Abstract can ever be granted sovereignty when the moth isn't even breathing loudly isn't what this is about. The Abstraction has never been, since it is seen only from the "couch of the biased flashlight holder," pointing at the corners which make him most excited. A streak of sound makes the Itch, just as the circle makes the center.