Jump to content
IGNORED

Have the Snip and we'll give you £200


skotosa

Recommended Posts

Drug addicts across the UK are being offered money to be sterilised by an American charity.

 

Project Prevention is offering to pay £200 to any drug user in London, Glasgow, Bristol, Leicester and parts of Wales who agrees to be operated on.

 

The first person in the UK to accept the cash is drug addict "John" from Leicester who says he "should never be a father".

 

The move has been criticised by some drug charities who work with addicts.

 

Project Prevention founder Barbara Harris admitted her methods amounted to "bribery", but said it was the only way to stop babies being physically and mentally damaged by drugs during pregnancy.

 

Drug treatment charity Addaction estimates one million children in the UK are living with parents who abuse drugs.

 

Pregnant addicts can pass on the dependency to the unborn child, leading to organ and brain damage.

 

Mrs Harris set up her charity in North Carolina after adopting the children of a crack addict.

 

Damage to children

 

Speaking to the BBC's Inside Out programme, she said: "The birth mother of my children obviously dabbled in all drugs and alcohol - she literally had a baby every year for eight years.

 

"I get very angry about the damage that drugs do to these children."

 

After paying 3,500 addicts across the United States not to have children, she is now visiting parts of the UK blighted by drugs to encourage users to undergo "long-term birth control" for cash.

 

John, a 38-year-old addict from Leicester, is the first person in the UK to accept money to have a vasectomy after being involved in drugs since he was 12.

 

He said: "It was something that I'd been thinking about for a long time.

 

"I won't be able to support a kid; I can just about manage to support myself."

 

Simon Antrobus, chief executive of Addaction, said while no-one wanted to see children brought up in a drug-using environment, there was no place for Project Prevention in the UK.

 

"It exploits very vulnerable people who are addicted to drugs and alcohol at probably the lowest point in their lives," he said.

 

The Reverend Robert Black, of Victory Outreach, which works with former addicts in east London, said he thought Project Prevention's aims were "very devious".

 

Reversible contraception

 

Maria Cripps, project manager at the Hackney Dovetail Centre which works with drug users and their carers, said: "I think Barbara uses some very extreme examples to get her point across. It might work in America but Great Britain is a very different country."

 

But Reverend Martin Blakebrough, director of Camden's Kaleidoscope Project in north London, said sterilisation was "worth considering" if it was right for the individual.

 

A spokesperson at the British Medical Association said: "The BMA's ethics committee does not have a view on the charity Project Prevention.

 

"As with all requests for treatment, doctors need to be confident that the individual has the capacity to make the specific decision at the time the decision is required.

 

"The BMA's ethics committee also believes that doctors should inform patients of the benefits of reversible contraception so that the patients have more reproductive choices in the future."

 

Source with video

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Blanket Fort Collapse

I absolutely think much much more stupid humans should be neutered. Off with their balls, hollow their uterus barren I say. Fuck people and most of all fuck dumb people. I understand this is a huge loss to freedom if their was ever a mandatory sterilization but god damn their are way too many stupid shitty people having children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely think much much more stupid humans should be neutered. Off with their balls, hollow their uterus barren I say. Fuck people and most of all fuck dumb people. I understand this is a huge loss to freedom if their was ever a mandatory sterilization but god damn their are way too many stupid shitty people having children.

 

who's side are you on really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.