Guest cyphersum Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 I'm sure this has been recognized before. I searched the forum but found nothing. I thought it was an interesting find when I decided to do it when Geogaddi first came out and now I'm sharing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
not_vikur Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 err Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jim Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cyphersum Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 err full of information that reply was. i've been listening to BoC since you were 13... :) how about a little feedback besides 'err' for this noob (actually not a noob, i supplied Joyrex with some aphex tidbits back in watmm heyday) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
not_vikur Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 im just trying to help you. get the ball rolling. push it up the hill etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cyphersum Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 im just trying to help you. get the ball rolling. push it up the hill etc. cool. maybe we should push it downhill then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tidbit Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 this means something, this is important.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest we_kill_soapscum Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 ohhhh, its turquoise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest skytree Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 i think this was initially brought to the attention of boc fans on David AC's former BoC pages, which now are tended by our fellow-watmmer, Fredd- E. as far as i'm aware, the inverted cover image observation was made closely after geogaddi's release, hence the sarcastic replies here thusfar. we're not a very forgiving bunch. anyhow, i agree that it's interesting, but am hesitant to say it was intentional and/or significant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cyphersum Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 i think this was initially brought to the attention of boc fans on David AC's former BoC pages, which now are tended by our fellow-watmmer, Fredd- E. as far as i'm aware, the inverted cover image observation was made closely after geogaddi's release, hence the sarcastic replies here thusfar. we're not a very forgiving bunch. anyhow, i agree that it's interesting, but am hesitant to say it was intentional and/or significant. I am that person who provided the insight to David AC’s site. I'm happy to see that the information still exists. I had forgotten about it. For me it's hard to imagine that such an occurance would be just purely coincidental. The probabilty of this being a coincidence is far less than that of intentional design. As for significance, I would say just slightly. It's definitely not on the level of say Beatle's Abbey Road cover with barefoot Paul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cyphersum Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 er, it can't be coincidence that when inverted it's blue....? what exactly is significant about that... other than the other two BoC album covers are blue.... personally I think it's significant because of it's intentionality. I would go so far as to say that the original image was in fact turquoise and it was inverted. And of course the significance is that the color of the Universe is turquoise, just as BoC has observed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest skytree Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 er, it can't be coincidence that when inverted it's blue....? what exactly is significant about that... other than the other two BoC album covers are blue.... personally I think it's significant because of it's intentionality. I would go so far as to say that the original image was in fact turquoise and it was inverted. And of course the significance is that the color of the Universe is turquoise, just as BoC has observed. actually, the true color was recently adjusted to being beige, not turquoise. article here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest skytree Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 p.s. see my signature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cyphersum Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 p.s. see my signature. pick me! pick me! ............. and the color is... beige! white noise included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lumpenprol Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Also, that observation about the color of the universe being turqoise, was made long after turquoise became a recurring theme with BoC. Though I suppose the most rabid fanboys might conclude that BoC somehow intuited this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Moebius Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 personally I think it's significant because of it's intentionality. I would go so far as to say that the original image was in fact turquoise and it was inverted. Perhaps, but the source image for the cover was already red. The source image is rather intriguing to me; it looks like there's sort of frame around the figure's torso and head, almost like someone cut out a rectangle from a different photo and pasted it over the original. There used to be a higher res version of it on David's site, I think Fredd scaled it down a bit. You can see it on the cover itself as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YEK Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 PWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN *drags cyphersum confused dazed body off of stage* "ALRIGHT FOLKS< SETP RIGHT UP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cyphersum Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 PWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN *drags cyphersum confused dazed body off of stage* "ALRIGHT FOLKS< SETP RIGHT UP help me out neighbor... i don't know the reference you make, what is pwn? and neighbor... because you are basically a ferry ride away, i live in san juan isles vicinity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
not_vikur Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 pwn is an unreleased boc track under their hell interface guise. whats this beatles thing i dont know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosmachine Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 p.s. see my signature. i saw going to quote that :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alzado Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 don't most images come up blue/black/white/purple-ish when you photo negative them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joyrex Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 oh, look at that cloud... it looks like a bunny... people see what they want to if they look hard enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adjective Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tidbit Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 nsfw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Raddcliff Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 don't most images come up blue/black/white/purple-ish when you photo negative them? no. all colours have a negative value. you can check the colour wheel to find what their values are. the neg value or complimentary can be found directly across from you chosen value in the colour wheel. here is a visual list of some values... http://www.colourtherapyhealing.com/colour...ary_colours.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.