chim Posted December 19, 2006 Share Posted December 19, 2006 it is a nice track though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenGOD Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 so if it was aphex it was half-arsed, but now that it's not it's a nice track? It's pretty weak if you ask me. but no one ever does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chim Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 halfarsed doesn't necessarily mean it's bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dr. Elemeno von Hat X: PhD Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 i think it does. you could argue this one but you're swimming upstream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chim Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 whatever homeboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jacderida Posted December 21, 2006 Share Posted December 21, 2006 This thread should have died as soon as the disagreement about "jungle techno" came up :). But I actually agree in principle that if something is half arsed it doesn't necessarily mean that it's bad. Aphex probably has hundreds of what he would consider half arsed unreleased tracks that are probably awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dr. Elemeno von Hat X: PhD Posted December 21, 2006 Share Posted December 21, 2006 it's relative really. wouldn't it be better if he did one whole-arsed track instead of two halves? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.