Jump to content
IGNORED

Older, Good PC games that I should play


Bubba69

Recommended Posts

I'm installing half-life right now(hopefully it runs OKAY). I don't know what I can really play because all I have is some shitty built in intel graphics card. I can't play anything that is very graphics intensive, and preferrably runs in WINE. Any suggestions? Do you think diablo or starcraft would work on this old machine?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest Iain C

Oh man. Get yourself a copy of DOSBox ( http://www.dosbox.com/ ) and then check out a few abandonware sites, play some good old classics from the 80s and 90s! Home of the Underdogs ( http://www.hotud.org/ ) is a really great and recently-resurrected source for old games, some will run in Windows but most of them will need DOSBox. Almost all of them will run on your decrepit old computer! The DOS Museum (http://www.dosmuseum.com) is a smaller, DOS-only resource, but it's got some great obscure classics on there nevertheless.

 

Of course, if it's Diablo you like, I recommend the (not quite but nearly) original hack-and-slash RPG, Nethack ( http://www.nethack.org/ ). It's been in continuous development since 1985 (like me), still updated today. Randomly-generated dungeons, loads of character races and classes, and more depth and replayability than any Diablo clone. And its graphics are created entirely using ASCII characters, so the system requirements are negligable. The graphics take a bit of getting used to, but give it a chance - it's very rewarding and incredibly addictive. I've been trying to beat it for longer than I can remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I installed morrowind yesterday and it runs horribly. Really jerky and slow to move around the game screen, and having to click on dialogue choices with the mouse pointer is a real chore. Is this just the way the game goes down? It gave me a headache after an hour of play. Ive got 3gig of ram and a dual core processor so I can't imagine it's that. Maybe the game doesn't like Vista?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Iain C

grim fandango

fallout

 

Grim Fandango is very hard to run on Vista, so I've heard. You can get Fallout for $6 at gog.com though - definitely recommended!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Iain C

Myst

 

Has to be the most over-rated game of the 90s.

 

 

you are incorrect sir

 

No, I am correct. Weak CG graphics, confusing navigation, illogical puzzles, and what story? Play something by LucasArts instead.

 

Edited to add that I don't care about graphics particularly, I play textmode games; but when you compare it to LucasArts games of the same era, it's clear to see which has aged better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest zaphod

is he running vista? it works fine in xp, i know that much. very worth getting. also pick up jedi knight, although if you have trouble running half life maybe scale back to dark forces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Iain C

Just reading this thread and posting has made me notalgic for great adventure games of years past. They weren't all made by LucasArts - I bet a lot of WATMMers would enjoy Westwood's somewhat late 1997 adaptation of Blade Runner (http://en.wikipedia....997_video_game)). You don't play Deckard, but a new Blade Runner operating at the same time, with an all-new plot. Despite that, it deals with the same themes of the film, uses a lot of the same locations, characters, and even features the beautiful soundtrack. The writing and acting is all of a high standard, and it even explores some of the themes from PK Dick's original novel in more depth than the film. It's amazingly atmospheric and definitely in the top ten adventure games ever released. No idea why it's not better-known or more highly-regarded... and it has 13 different endings!

 

I've got this on four(!) CDs somewhere and now I have to dig it out and play it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest zaphod

yeah that was pretty good.

 

pick up age of empires 2. probably the best bang for your buck and should run fine on an older machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.