Guest Benedict Cumberbatch Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 so is this old news? i'm confused. are those photos of different people? In December 2009 during a lecture at Madame Jojo’s in London, Andrew W.K. finally admitted that the Andrew W.K. persona was created by a committee including himself, his father, and other individuals. Claiming, “I’m not the guy you’ve seen from the I Get Wet album…I’m not that same person. I don’t just mean that in a philosophical or conceptual way. It’s not the same person at all.” He continued to say that people were auditioned to play the part of Andrew W.K. and that the music and performances were created, “in the spirit of commerce.” Finally, in an interview from the same video he says, “I thought it would be more interesting if my secret history was revealed after the fact rather than as a precursor”. i hate linking here but http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/42452885.html#cutid1 also for obsessiveness you can't beat: http://awilkeskrier.homestead.com/ actually that is mucch better ^ so basically there is more than one andrew wk but he wears the same clothes so you can't tell? or what? recently saw him (or someone) presenting some awful MTV show. full disclosure: i bought the party hard single but nothing since. i promise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perunamuusi Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 this is that penis i saw on the telly once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJW Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Yes, he's an edjit plonker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zaphod Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 uh, looks like he just shaved i'm not buying it edit: not that i actually care about andrew wk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan C Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 But which one was in Wolf Eyes? The plot thickens... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 who what where when why ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Moss Acid Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 I was a fan of AWK in 2001, bought his album, because it was all about banging chicks, sweat, love and partys. plus he liked to party hard. plus how can you shun an album with song titles like: "It's Time to Party" "Party Hard" "Take It Off" "She Is Beautiful" "Party til You Puke" "Fun Night" "I Get Wet" "We Want Fun" "Make Sex" Btw, Captain Ahab are the rave version of AWK, but better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Yegg Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 He was pretty cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaini Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 this actually strikes me as plausible cos when dude originally surfaced in 2002 he was a lot more self-destructive than 'current' AWK also he's fucking writing movies and producing lee perry and shit now, which wouldn't strike me as likely with the 'previous' AWK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomeperson Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Moss Acid Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 after watching some youtube videos, he seems like a smart guy and comes across as well spoken too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Benedict Cumberbatch Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 after watching some youtube videos, he seems like a smart guy and comes across as well spoken too. yer its an odd mix of party hard and vague smartness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Benedict Cumberbatch Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 the video in the first link is very odd. he (someone) admits to not being the original wk link: http://www.rockfeedback.com/tv/direct/channels/297400/726569/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rambo Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 I was in a state of confusion about AWK's success at the time because his music was strangely bad. Like really really bad. He stuck out like a sore thumb. It was as if 2 extremely powerful people had a bet to see if they could get people to buy into it. Humanity -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KY Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 my mind is either blown or unconvinced; i'm not quite following though. so is andrew w.k. somebody who has never appeared publicly? or has the real andrew w.k. appeared as himself at one point in his career, and somebody else posing as him in another? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaini Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 the prosecution lies thus prior to 2005 andrew wk did loud, shouty metal so facepalm he transcended it, and made the occasional good track in process. he would beat himself up and cut himself and generally make shit of himself onstage. most photos of pre-2005 wk involve blood and occasionally nudity. the post-2005 andrew wk wears a beret, smokes gitanes, drinks double espressos, and in between his main activities of producing albums for lee scratch perry and shaving sasha grey's snatch in the name of art, he spends his time declining the opportunity to narrate documentaries on things like jacques derrida or an obscure font and getting paid to show up at events. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Benedict Cumberbatch Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 the prosecution lies thus prior to 2005 andrew wk did loud, shouty metal so facepalm he transcended it, and made the occasional good track in process. he would beat himself up and cut himself and generally make shit of himself onstage. most photos of pre-2005 wk involve blood and occasionally nudity. the post-2005 andrew wk wears a beret, smokes gitanes, drinks double espressos, and in between his main activities of producing albums for lee scratch perry and shaving sasha grey's snatch in the name of art, he spends his time declining the opportunity to narrate documentaries on things like jacques derrida or an obscure font and getting paid to show up at events. also prior 2005 he worked with wolf eyes post 2005 he tours as a motivation speaker the photos in the OP could be the same person though right? i'm confused still did anyone watch the video? its like hes tryign to explain but also confuse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaini Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 closet scientologist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rambo Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 if post-2005 he appears as a motivational speaker, it's the same guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Franklin Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 I think it's neat that this may have been a joke persona from the get go because the music and schtick was so obviously god awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blanket Fort Collapse Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 the video in the first link is very odd. he (someone) admits to not being the original wk link: http://www.rockfeedback.com/tv/direct/channels/297400/726569/ ...omg it was a reptilian clone, watch that video again and listen to what he says better, wait you kids aren't serious about this never mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest analogue wings Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 since when was it a secret that it was a joke persona? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest iamabe Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zaphod Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 i'm so confused. it was obviously a joke from the get go. how could you not realize that the whole thing was an ironic persona, and still is to some degree? also i watched the video in the first link. i think he's just saying that the persona has changed. i can't find any evidence that the actual performer ever changed, unless some other guy was doing the music before and now isn't? wtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Franklin Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 weird. I think I complicated things in here. I actually didn't know that this fellow was aving a laff when he first came out... I just thought he was shit/retarded and ignored the whole andrew wk movement. When I read this thread I noticed that chrismoss said he liked him and bought the first record so I thought that people actually took him seriously and just had bad taste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.