"American Anthrax" a Media Roots film production

[LimpyLoo]

Great trailer, Robbie

Did you edit that 100% yourself?

If so, you got mad chops and I'm jelly

[goDel]

looks very promising!

 

btw, it's a new subject, so i'd prefer a new thread.

[awepittance]

 

 

Alleged CIA Involvement In 2001 Anthrax Attacks: Exclusive Interview with Matt Dehart

Three years ago I made a 40-minute documentary called American Anthrax, in which I laid out facts illustrating that the FBI pinned the 2001 anthrax attacks on an innocent man named Bruce Ivins.

Recently I was directed to a very compelling Buzzfeed article (a first) by David Kushner titled 'I Might Have Some Sensitive Files'. The article outlined the legal predicament of former drone intelligence analyst Matt Dehart, who claims that he had been given a set of leaked documents which held very sensitive information. Matt was alleging that the real reason that he was in jail was due to what he had seen in those documents. Allegedly these files contained some explosive allegations about the CIA being behind the 2001 anthrax letter attacks in some way. It was also claimed in this Buzfeed article that the documents explain that the anthrax attacks were

committed in order to further fear-monger the public and help sell the Iraq War.

Although many had previously written about Matt's legal predicament before (the Courage Foundation has officially supported him), virtually no writers or journalists followed up on this new shocking claim that was revealed by Matt in the Buzzfeed article except for Marcy Wheeler who wrote a piece about it on Empty Wheel.

Very soon after I read this article I was approached by people close to Matt Dehart who said that my appearance on Abby's show Breaking the Set, where we discussed American Anthrax 'got everything right'. A few more months passed going back and forth with various parties involved. Eventually I spoke with Matt directly via a collect call from jail. Our time was very limited (15-20 minutes) so I focused on the one document and asked him to recall as many details as he could over the course of our interview. Since I have not seen the document(s) myself,I cannot personally verify any of the details.

As it turned out, the Buzzfeed article oversimplified the details, which made it hard to discern certain important aspects about why Matt thinks that the document is real (as opposed to a hoax, and why the document is actually a zip containing many different documents related to Amerithrax). In our conversation he revealed some compelling new details, such as:

- An alleged FBI whistleblower compiled this archive, which among other subjects included a compilation of 'hundreds of pages' of files relating to the 2001 anthrax letter attacks, some of them dating from before 9/11. In the text primer this whistleblower explained that inside the series of documents is evidence of CIA involvement in the attacks.

- One of the alleged proposed 'targets' was the Port of Newark in New Jersey.

- The contents of an alleged Nuclear Regulatory Commission document was tracing cobalt radiation emissions (cobalt radiation can be used to render weaponized anthrax inert)

- Allegations against the 'Vice President Himself' quashing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s radiation investigation. (I'm assuming he doesn't mean Joe Biden)

The following interview was conducted via collect call from the Warren County Regional Jail with inmate Matt Dehart. I began the call by giving Matt an opportunity to make any statement he felt necessary, and he reminded me that the contents of our phone conversation would be recorded and shared with federal investigators.

BEGIN transcript------------------------------------------------

Matt Dehart: The most helpful thing at the moment would to be to get my thumb drives back, both my Ironkey D100 which i had back in 2010 in Canada, and probably more recently my Kanguru Defender Elite which was handed over to the department of justice following my removal from Canada. That was never the government's to begin with, that was my personal property. I still don't know what the legality is of them holding it. They're not saying they're using it as evidence, they're just kind of taunting me with it. The assistant US attorney told my lawyer 'we have these drives' and it was an off-handed remark to him almost like yeah we really know what’s going on but we're not going to come out and say it. I guess to give you a background here, if you know my background and what I did in the guard was with drones. I was an all source intelligence analyst. We had seen some illegal activity involving the 'signature strikes'. I'm not going to say who 'we' are, but uh that's basically what sparked our interest to basically collect more evidence of wrongdoing by a specific agency, namely the CIA.

By 2009 someone had uploaded a file to the shell, which is a server that I had operated the front-end of. Can't really tell you the size of it. It had a text intro from an individual claiming to be a special agent for the FBI, he was explaining how the included documents pointed to CIA involvement in the Amerithrax case. It had an index, a file index which i skimmed through, it had PDFs, powerpoint files. The PDFs included scanned hand-written notes. Specifics which stood out to me, i mean I jotted some notes down before were technical nature of stuff like degraded Anthrax VS Brucellosis, degraded Anthrax VS Tularemia. There was nuclear regulatory commission paperwork tracking a radioactive cobalt source. From the handwritten notes, they thought that source was used to degrade or render inert weaponized anthrax. What else stood out to me.. it was the Ames strain of anthrax, and they said it was weaponized 'electro-statically charged silicon nano particles'. That's been burned into my memory

Robbie Martin: Do you remember the date of the document, when it was from?

Matt Dehart: The specific 7zip that was uploaded, or?

Robbie Martin: Just the Amerithrax.

Matt Dehart: That was September of 2009, the document was compressed. This was an archive file with a lot more files inside of it. There were scanned documents predating the official investigation, the scanned documents were back to mid 2001, is the earliest I remember. There is before and after the actual attacks. This file was compiled sometime in 2009.

Robbie Martin: and you're talking about the entire archive?

Matt Dehart: The entire 7zip archive, yes.

Robbie Martin: The most explosive part of what I read was that the charges being leveled from the FBI at the CIA essentially suggesting involvement of some kind. Was that the general gist of this document or was that just one part of a larger document about Amerithrax?

Matt Dehart: That was in the introduction that was written as a text file that was the first named file in the document once it was extracted. That was what the claimed special agent was saying that the documents illustrated. That it was CIA involvement in the attacks, not just CIA involvement in the investigation.

Robbie Martin: So the actual document, it probably had potentially some details in it that would suggest something like that, are you able to talk about anything you saw in that document beyond the text primer of what suggested that?

Matt Dehart: Yes I skimmed through it, like I said that’s what stood out the actual degraded anthrax VS brucellosis, degraded anthrax vs tularemia. There were maps of Newark, the city of Newark and the port of Newark specifically. And during the txt intro, the alleged special agent said that was a potential target. The port of Newark, that’s what he asserted. This stuff looked like… I'm not going to say whether I've seen classified documents but from what I know these were real documents. They were, some of them seemed to be JWICS sourced, JWICS is a classified network that US agencies use. I know for a fact that several people that had been involved with me had access to JWICS. I’m not going to say any names or who I think might have uploaded that or knew someone that had access to that but it all lead me to believe this was all real information. It's not something you could have faked is what I'm saying.

RM: In this allegation, were there any FBI officials or CIA officials that were named or implicated in any way?

MD: There's a few names in the document, they look like they had been redacted probably by the person who assembled this file. Yes to an extent. All the NRC, the nuclear regulatory stuff didn't seem redacted to me at all.

That’s what stuck out to me the most, the tracking of this cobalt source, this radioactive source. That’s a pretty unique avenue of the investigation. They're basically saying thats how the weaponized anthrax was rendered inert or least less lethal.

RM: That's very interesting, I don't know if I've actually heard that before, I'll have to look into that.

Now as far as the idea the allegation was, the CIA was doing this to help sell the Iraq war. Was this person suggesting that the White House was involved in this, or that it was somehow being done independently? I guess what I'm asking is how far up the chain of command was this person suggesting that it went. Was he suggesting some kind of rogue CIA action or something different?

MD: He didn't make too many assertions in that regard as to how it was called for initially, but he did assert that the FBI investigation which was following this NRC paperwork that it be quashed and that came from the Vice President himself. That's basically what his assertion was, again I wish I had the full file.

RM: Did you have a chance to read the Buzzfeed article about your story?

MD: No I never did.

RM: I was just curious how you felt about the portrayal of your story in there

Marcy Wheeler, I don't know if you were aware, she runs a blog called Empty Wheel. She was writing specifically about this one document and speculating that it was some kind of honey trap because a document had been leaked a long time ago suggesting to try to setup Wikileaks, I'm just wondering what your opinion was on that theory.

MD: I mean, that's a possibility. The specific nature, and I guess the unique angle of some of the things, I don't see why they would go through that much effort and trying just to set up Wikileaks, and why it was uploaded to the shell and… the timing was off. There weren't that many people that used our file hosting part of the shell, much less so than use storage, to mention storage which I find fascinating. When the information was recompiled to bring up to Canada the 2nd time, when I sought asylum. That was actually placed in the FBenemy directory on storage and the storage was moved to freedom hosting after we stopped hosting and the individual who hosted freedom hosting was arrested on child-porn or something charges. So that's gone now, but I do have, we have screenshots of that directory still and that’s what I used in my motions to dismiss. So I'm just saying the effort the government has gone through just to crush this belies something else entirely.

RM: Yeah, no I hear you there.

MD: These are real f-, I mean they're..

[phone drops out]

..files, there's handwritten notes, there's hundreds of pages. I could see maybe like a powerpoint slide a slideshow maybe, that that would be fake, no this took a lot of time.

RM: In this document was the name Bruce Ivins or Stephen Hatfill ever mentioned?

MD: Not that I noticed, no.

RM: I'd really like to get you a copy of American Anthrax, would you be able to watch a DVD if I sent you one?

MD: Unless it was part of discovery in the case, no I don't really have the ability to..

[ unintelligible message telling us the call is about to end ]

RM: I think they're about to cut off the call, a weird message just came on.

So is there anything else that you wanted to say just in general, what’s going on with your case right now. Any updates?

MD: -- to get these drives back, I would like people to kind of put some more pressure out there to get them back, cause the effort ..

[phone drops out]

..authorities to keep us from getting them for use in the asylum case, it was ridiculous, I mean..

[phone drops out]

..requests that we gave to their government, which is like a FOIA in Canada, they..

[phone drops out]

..other law, they had secret

[call cuts off]

-------------------------------------------------------END transcript

 

These discussions with Matt Dehart will be part of a continuing series about the 2001 anthrax attacks.