Salvatorin Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 I'm starting to think its just a badly stitched together fake. At 2:54 there's a slight scratch and jump and it goes on like the beginning for awhile. What's the time for this version? Mine is 4:19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perunamuusi Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lester Chaykin Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Caustic Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 I suggest that this become the new image of Unimpression. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest earlgrey Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 I'm starting to think its just a badly stitched together fake. At 2:54 there's a slight scratch and jump and it goes on like the beginning for awhile. What's the time for this version? Mine is 4:19 Mine's 4:16, and at 3:01 the louder percussion comes back in; yeah, sounds kind of edity the moment they return. Is that the point you meant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dr. Elemeno von Hat X: PhD Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 I suggest that this become the new image of Unimpression. nah, that's just the image vicodin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rook Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 I suggest that this become the new image of Unimpression. nah, that's just the image vicodin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salvatorin Posted June 29, 2007 Author Share Posted June 29, 2007 I'm starting to think its just a badly stitched together fake. At 2:54 there's a slight scratch and jump and it goes on like the beginning for awhile. What's the time for this version? Mine is 4:19 Mine's 4:16, and at 3:01 the louder percussion comes back in; yeah, sounds kind of edity the moment they return. Is that the point you meant? Yes. Yes it is. So is this really the demo version, or just fingerbib in lo-fi audio, lengthened badly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Thisket Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salvatorin Posted June 29, 2007 Author Share Posted June 29, 2007 never fucking mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Renivatio Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 fucking lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 It was ages before I realised that really annoying song that still gets stuck in my head every day wasn't actually the Logan Rock Witch demo... :turned: xeryoj sreehc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salvatorin Posted September 4, 2007 Author Share Posted September 4, 2007 lol unerathingness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Barricade Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 If you run the fingerbib demo through a spectrograph you see aphex face LOL'ing at you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Caustic Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AOOproductions Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 dude finger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Helper ET Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 fib=ngerbib was prolly my first fav afx track maybe 4 but definetly rdj album Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.