Guest Babar Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 just think of how many hot chicks are taking a shit every second... 97222 (if you consider that it takes 2min to take a dump and that 1 chick out 100 is hot) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chassis Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 How long is the average shared sexual experience? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sine Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 just think of how many hot chicks are taking a shit every second... i would love to be a fly in those toilets Huh, i never would have guessed troon was a coprophage. semi-NSFW (unless you work at home, alone) "Is this stool taken?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 the problems don't want to get solved (that's the problem) basically, most of the problems would be quite easily fixed if you took the humans out of the decision making process, so i don't see how some all powerful hive mind of 7 billion humans is going to help things. In fact it would probably lobby for the one thing that would make our lot on earth fundamentally worse. It would argue that we needed more people on earth, as in it's self interest the more people there are, the more power this processing device would be. --- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Braintree Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 im not offended about your thread idea, i am offended that for asking a simple explanation of the very idea this thread was supposed to be about, you, the thread creator, ignored me and acted like i was an idiot, and then attacked me personally. So then I should assume you still don't know what the thread means? In that case, you called the thread banal and totally inconsequential with nothing to back up that statement... in which case: Or you figured it out all on your own and now you're butthurt, in which case: I think your math is off, wake. Why don't you break it down for us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YEK Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 if only we could network all the minds of the world to form some sort of supercomputer. we could harness a small percentage of each person's brain power to solve the world's problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wake Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 im not offended about your thread idea, i am offended that for asking a simple explanation of the very idea this thread was supposed to be about, you, the thread creator, ignored me and acted like i was an idiot, and then attacked me personally. So then I should assume you still don't know what the thread means? In that case, you called the thread banal and totally inconsequential with nothing to back up that statement... in which case: Or you figured it out all on your own and now you're butthurt, in which case: I think your math is off, wake. Why don't you break it down for us? K, the math here is pretty simple.. 7 billion x 1 second = 221.821352 years. Ding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Funktion Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 i move to ban the facepalm emoticon for the reasons thus 1) it is passive aggresive and/or smug to respond to a post you disapprove of with such a trite collection of unwholesome pixels 2) it encourages posters to respond uncreatively 3) its use among the more eccentric and homosexual members of this board has led to a trash culture 4) anyone who responds to this post with a facepalm is a big girly faggot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wake Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 i move to ban the facepalm emoticon for the reasons thus 1) it is passive aggresive and/or smug to respond to a post you disapprove of with such a trite collection of unwholesome pixels 2) it encourages posters to respond uncreatively 3) its use among the more eccentric and homosexual members of this board has led to a trash culture 4) anyone who responds to this post with a facepalm is a big girly faggot By the way, I totally respect your homophobia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plstik Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 im not offended about your thread idea, i am offended that for asking a simple explanation of the very idea this thread was supposed to be about, you, the thread creator, ignored me and acted like i was an idiot, and then attacked me personally. So then I should assume you still don't know what the thread means? In that case, you called the thread banal and totally inconsequential with nothing to back up that statement... in which case: Or you figured it out all on your own and now you're butthurt, in which case: I think your math is off, wake. Why don't you break it down for us? K, the math here is pretty simple.. 7 billion x 1 second = 221.821352 years. Ding. I got something about 217 years, but anyway, you´ll get a better feeling for this number if you do the math by yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wake Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 im not offended about your thread idea, i am offended that for asking a simple explanation of the very idea this thread was supposed to be about, you, the thread creator, ignored me and acted like i was an idiot, and then attacked me personally. So then I should assume you still don't know what the thread means? In that case, you called the thread banal and totally inconsequential with nothing to back up that statement... in which case: Or you figured it out all on your own and now you're butthurt, in which case: I think your math is off, wake. Why don't you break it down for us? K, the math here is pretty simple.. 7 billion x 1 second = 221.821352 years. Ding. I got something about 217 years, but anyway, you´ll get a better feeling for this number if you do the math by yourself. K, after using a different calculator to solve this *really* difficult math equation, I came up with 221.9685438864. The difficult steps: 7,000,000,000 / 365 / 24 / 60 / 60 = 221.9685438864 Either way, I'm not too sure how you came up with 217. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plstik Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 12(months)x31(days) edit: and i wasnt talking to you ´bout doing the math and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redruth Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 the problems don't want to get solved (that's the problem) basically, most of the problems would be quite easily fixed if you took the humans out of the decision making process Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wake Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 12(months)x31(days) Ah yeah, the 12x31 would get you. edit: and i wasnt talking to you ´bout doing the math and stuff. Sorry, I'm in grumpy-mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plstik Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Sorry, I'm in grumpy-mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Funktion Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 the joke is on you, sir, for i had already anticipated such a response in my original post. it appears that you are quite the fag and that you have just made a fool out of yourself in front of everyone on these forums. edit: check and mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 edit: check and mate. no check before you need to edit ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wake Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tht tne Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 wow guys it's wake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atop Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!!!1 :emotawesomepm9: 222 is the new 666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wake Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!!!1 :emotawesomepm9: 222 is the new 666 :emotawesomepm9: ZING! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atop Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wake Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 COOL!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tht tne Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 i move to ban the facepalm emoticon for the reasons thus 1) it is passive aggresive and/or smug to respond to a post you disapprove of with such a trite collection of unwholesome pixels 2) it encourages posters to respond uncreatively 3) its use among the more eccentric and homosexual members of this board has led to a trash culture 4) anyone who responds to this post with a facepalm is a big girly faggot By the way, I totally respect your homophobia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atop Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 I have heard that schizophrenics have a hard time understanding irony.....? Is this true IRARI? I am a scientist, I need to know! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.