Jump to content


Supporting Member
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


zlemflolia last won the day on November 1 2023

zlemflolia had the most liked content!


Previous Fields

  • Country
    Not Selected

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

zlemflolia's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Dedicated
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges




Community Answers

  1. okay elon? what was the "different gig" ? i assume this site wont render cuz im not logged in? literally cant see shit, fuck twitter jordan BAFFOON peterson gets NO gigs. jordan BULK peterson devoirs growth hormone infested steak exclusively for 6 years, left with nose dripping antibiotics, closet uncleaned
  2. many layers of misconception here. the myth of bitcoin's anonymity is itself a myth. everyone knows about deanonymization attacks and thats why anonymity oriented cryptos exist
  3. great example of how fascism can come about so easily even among people who ostensibly were victims of fascism in the past. absolutely disgusting government. fuck them. they say this with that flag behind them. imagine showing this to a victim of the holocaust
  4. so did france and england, mister big brain
  5. 1935 https://www.nationalchurchillmuseum.org/winston-churchill-and-the-gathering-storm.html and i would hardly call it relevant. hitler was a fascist anti-semite from the very beginning and stalin's quote is even earlier, 1931
  6. just cuz modern russia is invading ukraine doesnt mean you have to revise history to create narratives of russia being pro-hitler or something. fought with hitler? sources please. they had a non-aggression pact because stalin was left with no choices after UK+France refused an anti-fascist pact with them https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07075332.2018.1458043 "ussr fought with hitler" borders on nazi apologism considering the nazis killed more soviets than ANY other group of people. your writings piss me off because youre so anxious to stay on some side that you lie and write falsities even extremely anti-soviet biased wikipedia says the same thing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact The treaty was the culmination of negotiations for an economic agreement between the USSR and Nazi Germany which the Soviets used to obtain a political agreement – see Nazi–Soviet economic relations (1934–1941) § 1938–1939 deal discussions. On 22 August, Ribbentrop flew to Moscow to finalize the treaty, which the Soviets had sought before with Britain and France USSR was not exactly in a position to be invaded and needed time for rapid industrialization in deeper territories to manufacture equipment in preparation for WW2. tell me, did UK + France shut down economic relations with Germany in that time period that USSR maintained them? Meanwhile, Churchill on Hitler: Churchill went on to conclude: “We cannot tell whether Hitler will be the man who will once again let loose upon the world another war in which civilisation will irretrievably succumb, or whether he will go down in history as the man who restored honour and peace of mind to the great Germanic nation. . . . [History] is replete with examples of men who have risen to power by employing stern, grim, and even frightful methods but who, nevertheless, when their life is revealed as a whole, have been regarded as great figures whose lives have enriched the story of mankind. So may it be with Hitler.”Churchill concluded his essay on a hopeful note: “We may yet to live to see Hitler a gentler figure in a happier age.” ((Buchanan, Churchill, Hitler, and “The Unnecessary War”, 173-174.)) As opposed to Stalin... https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1931/01/12.htm In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty. So cut the shit, two wrongs don't make a right and your historical revisionism in an attempt to be disproportionately anti-Russian simply result in you writing outright Nazi apologism.
  7. bad faith argument, anyway apply that to the people of DPR/LPR that Ukraine was perpetrating civil war against in violation of peace treaties, one of Russia's stated reasons for invading to begin with
  8. palestine is being actively occupied by israel who is funded and armed by the US, explain how this is even remotely a similar scenario
  9. ukraine has been violating peace agreements for a decade, attacking their own citizens in russian border regions through drawn out civil wars, cutting off crimeans' water supply. if you want to make these evil great man arguments youll fool yourself into thinking putin is some all powerful dictator and the only person making decisions. you think you hold a moral high ground on "russia bad, ukraine good" and so you can just say any old bullshit and hope it sticks. but if you do it you only do a disservice to the ukrainian people who have been mistreated so badly by their government, which by the way is a government instated with CIA backing during 2014 far right coup. is putin/russia treating the ukrainian people worse? yeah, definitely, but youre missing even basic nuance and context when you continually try to simplify things. ignoring the crimes of the ukrainian government, which used to often be called out in western media, before this of course, isn't going to help anyone not only that, you are denying any US involvement in this whole conflict which is disingenuous extremely and becomes nothing more than pro-US propaganda. US, surely known for its antiwar stances right? while its weapon contractors make billions. and you say the US has no involvement? give me a fucking break i see people doing this a lot, being on "the side of the ukrainians" and instead actually being on "the side of the ukrainian government" which was and is a far right dictatorship, which is drafting its citizens to fight in this war because they dont want to actually fight. being "on the side of the ukrainian people by shipping them weapons" when those weapons prolong the war and result in more ukrainians dead, a quick defeat of the Ukrainian government by Russia, without Ukraine getting US weapons aid, would have saved more Ukrainian lives. but this isn't ideologically convenient for you, you'd prefer a long drawn out war for the ideology of nationalism everyone would be better off and far less dead if ukraine gov met putin's terms of surrender set at the beginning of the war but people think nationalistic jingoism is the answer. whose side do you think you are on wanting the war to continue with more and more US weaponry? war is not the answer, and being on any "side" except the ukrainian people, who are objectively harmed by the war, is contrary to the true side you should be on, wanting the war to end. "but i do want it to end" you say, then why do you support US weapons aid and support trying to have ukraine "win" it? its too late, ukraine is destroyed at this point, they lost, and it's the US's fault. a true win would be a quick loss to Russia in the beginning. far more would be alive.
  10. wait i thought they were drafting more and more segments of the population beccause nobody does want to fight?
  11. i couldn't say it better myself brother. the only way to understand this is to remove all historical context, especially the history of the past decade
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.