Bubba69 Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 http://nevergetoutoftheboat.blogspot.com/2...02/beatles.html pretty cool if so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Theres no reason why it wouldnt be, and it certainly seems so from the blog and a quick listen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karmakramer Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 This pretty much blows me away that they recorded this in 1968. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 After listening all the way through and being a Beatles fan (I know, I know) I'm pretty sure thats real. Fuck the Beatles they are so fucking over-rated. In before LUDD^^. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest David R James Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Revolution 9 is my favourite beatles track you can here some of the segments in take 20 used in that. The second half of 'take 20' is so much better than the released 4.15 min version, would of made a good final track to the album. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velazquez Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 yes it's real, hence Ringo's blistered fingers. Palladin Press is putting a book out on fags who hate the Beatles, look for it in late spring of '09. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest beatfanatic Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I love The Beatles so quite looking forward to listening to this how can anyone hate The Beatles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 *Waits with anticipation for LUDD*. He's gonna fucking exaplode guys, like, everywhere. Like the final scene of Braindead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velazquez Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 too bad LUDD doesn't know shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Ohhhhh thats naughty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I'm only joking anyway, he loves them really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Aces Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I really want to hear this but the downloads have been removed already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Its streaming on that link mate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaini Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 fucking awesome reminder of why they are still one of the most important bands evar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest David R James Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 fucking awesome reminder of why they are still one of the most important bands evar Agreed But someone is going to disagree soon though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Aces Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Its streaming on that link mate? I was hoping to listen to it later. But I'll have a look when I have finished listening to what I am now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Was there really nothing like this before The Beatles? (Serious question). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaini Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 welllll by 1968 there was but in 1965/1966 when the beatles started getting psychedelic? very little. maybe love or the 13th floor elevators Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Aces Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Probably taking their cue from William Burroughs and company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest David R James Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Was there really nothing like this before The Beatles? (Serious question). In terms of popular music there wasnt that much but if anyone knows of anything please tell There was all the avante garde artist making music concrete working with tape manipulation and effects since the late 40's , a guy call raymond scott was developing electronic early synthesis devices in the 50's and creating clever little jingles, and then we have the radiophonic workshop, im a big beatles fan but the people ive just mentioned mean more to me because it was the start of electronic music. And in terms of the beatles i always look to george martin as the guy that created the magical aspects of the beatles records. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaini Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 mccartney was very interested in musique concrete way before revolution #9, he did some still unreleased tape loop stuff by himself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I didn't think Love were as early as that to be honest, I thought they were very late 60's early 70's. I can't seem to think of anything like it I guess, Jade Warrior were psychadelic but I'm not sure when they were around? What about Can? Curved Air, King Crimson? But were the Beatles the first band to use opera, brass bands in this way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaini Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 ahem Love started playing the L.A. clubs in April, 1965 and became a popular act. At this time, they were playing extended numbers such as "Revelation" (originally titled "John Lee Hooker") and getting the attention of such luminaries as the Rolling Stones and the Yardbirds. The band lived communally in a house once owned by horror actor Bela Lugosi, and their first two albums included photos shot in the garden of that house. 1966-1968 Signed to the Elektra Records label, the band scored a minor hit single in 1966 with their version of Burt Bacharach's "My Little Red Book". In the meantime, Lee had dismissed Conka and Fleckenstein, replacing them with Alban "Snoopy" Pfisterer and Ken Forssi (from a post-"Wipeout" version of The Surfaris). Their debut album, Love, was released in May 1966, and included "Signed D.C" and MacLean's "Softly To Me". The album sold moderately well and reached #57 on the album charts. In August, 1966, the single "7 and 7 Is" became their highest-charting at #33. Two more members were added around this time, Tjay Cantrelli (aka John Barberis) on woodwinds and Michael Stuart on drums. Pfisterer, never a confident drummer, switched to harpsichord. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest David R James Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 mccartney was very interested in musique concrete way before revolution #9, he did some still unreleased tape loop stuff by himself I thought i read that it was john who made most of that, while paul was on holiday and when he came back he was royaly pissed when he found out he wasnt involved. But that might be BS, i read it one the net. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abusivegeorge Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Oh shit, didn't know it was that early I guess Love were pretty fucking influential as well then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.