Guest crivella Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 fuck yeah basic channel /constructive contribution were you being sarcastic or not? I think the Basic Channel comparison was ok, same sort of basic idea but they thought of it in 1993. what you call basic maybe it's means refined..... and basic channel did regular 4\4 early 90' techno didn't using granular synth. i know this track is not complete and i have already thanked you for your technical tips...but when you make this kind of statement i understand why you needed 20 post to understand why i used "POST". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest crivella Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 fuck yeah basic channel /constructive contribution were you being sarcastic or not? I think the Basic Channel comparison was ok, same sort of basic idea but they thought of it in 1993. what you call basic maybe it's means refined..... and basic channel did regular 4\4 early 90' techno didn't using granular synth. i know this track is not complete and i have already thanked you for your technical tips...but when you make this kind of statement i understand why you needed 20 post to understand why i used "POST". sorry for the rime...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hautlle Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 This whole thread is lol. I thought it was boring, used to do this stuff in FL many years ago. Thanks for providing entertainment though! i just heard your music... your comment is like a XVI century painter who looks a cubist painting. WATMM noobs: They know your entire artistic output of 12+ years from one track they heard online Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swerm Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 This whole thread is lol. I thought it was boring, used to do this stuff in FL many years ago. Thanks for providing entertainment though! i just heard your music... your comment is like a XVI century painter who looks a cubist painting. WATMM noobs: They know your entire artistic output of 12+ years from one track they heard online Is he saying that his musical output is 400 years ahead of yours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamos scorcho Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 i only listened because the thread was large. i'm not going to chide you for your pretensions. i used to start threads here with titles like 'next level shit' and 'i am the best' etc this track is interesting. the sounds you get out of the synth are quite pleasing. from the standpoint of a dullard Igloo music critic that listens to shitloads of music like this for some reason, it would likely be right up their alley and they would give it an 8/10. I have these compilations of noise and electronic music and this could rather easily fit on there but from a musical standpoint i personally think it's kind of boring. i wouldn't return to it. so, get signed to raster norton or whatever label Pan Sonic are on then release this, people will give it 8s and 9s out of 10s. post it on YLC and it will get shat on, like shit falling off of a bridge. either way it's hopeless [just kidding] from me, i think it is nice sounding in terms of harmonix and shit and the synth you got, but compositionally it is rather dull. in my humble opinion anybody can make cool sounds but if you can't "write a toon' or incorporate a structure than you're dead in your wheels but don't take my word for it it sounds good, overall PS: this isn't progressive at all, there are 1000s of records released every hour that sound like this, and this has been going on for around 40 years now. still it is adventurous in its own way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taphead Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 putting your boundaries on a pedestal seems odd to me, especially when it's so limited. it's like the electronic musicians role is being broken down until it's just a sort of curatorial relationship with machines. it shouldn't be enough to impress with "I only needed x", I wanted the limitation to create a world where a subtle depth is revealed in the limited palette, where calculated decisions yield severity and intensity out of small gestures, but I didn't get that. Everything just sort of settled in. I got the impression that 'this was it' fairly quickly, and never shook it. but hey you're doing your thing, and seem pretty confident about it, which is why I felt free to be honest. but yeah, at the very least you seem to have a very specific point of view about how things should be, and that's pretty great regardless of what I think about the product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamos scorcho Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 I think there should be a genre called 'Garageband' where people ONLY use Garageband and the synths/stuff that comes with it to make music. that would be fucking amazing for a comp here actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taphead Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 defaultism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest crivella Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 i only listened because the thread was large. i'm not going to chide you for your pretensions. i used to start threads here with titles like 'next level shit' and 'i am the best' etc this track is interesting. the sounds you get out of the synth are quite pleasing. from the standpoint of a dullard Igloo music critic that listens to shitloads of music like this for some reason, it would likely be right up their alley and they would give it an 8/10. I have these compilations of noise and electronic music and this could rather easily fit on there but from a musical standpoint i personally think it's kind of boring. i wouldn't return to it. so, get signed to raster norton or whatever label Pan Sonic are on then release this, people will give it 8s and 9s out of 10s. post it on YLC and it will get shat on, like shit falling off of a bridge. either way it's hopeless [just kidding] from me, i think it is nice sounding in terms of harmonix and shit and the synth you got, but compositionally it is rather dull. in my humble opinion anybody can make cool sounds but if you can't "write a toon' or incorporate a structure than you're dead in your wheels but don't take my word for it it sounds good, overall PS: this isn't progressive at all, there are 1000s of records released every hour that sound like this, and this has been going on for around 40 years now. still it is adventurous in its own way these last words do not console me. i did not able (not yet) to transpose in music (in good music) my concept. this's the music makers error who think too much. and i don't really like raster-noton music. it sounds like music made by eunuches. but i go on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oscillik Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ruDdcd8G-g Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o00o Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ruDdcd8G-g lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest crivella Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 putting your boundaries on a pedestal seems odd to me, especially when it's so limited. it's like the electronic musicians role is being broken down until it's just a sort of curatorial relationship with machines. it shouldn't be enough to impress with "I only needed x", I wanted the limitation to create a world where a subtle depth is revealed in the limited palette, where calculated decisions yield severity and intensity out of small gestures, but I didn't get that. Everything just sort of settled in. I got the impression that 'this was it' fairly quickly, and never shook it. but hey you're doing your thing, and seem pretty confident about it, which is why I felt free to be honest. but yeah, at the very least you seem to have a very specific point of view about how things should be, and that's pretty great regardless of what I think about the product. "where calculated decisions yield severity and intensity out of small gestures" that's just what i want. i will try again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Member Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 these last words do not console me. i did not able (not yet) to transpose in music (in good music) my concept. this's the music makers error who think too much. and i don't really like raster-noton music. it sounds like music made by eunuches. but i go on. hmmmm... crivella = :sup: ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamos scorcho Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 same here mesh gear. trying to hypnotize myself with Porter Ricks - Biokinetics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest crivella Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 i did the new version, i think is better. thanks for the feedbacks. http://soundcloud.com/kento3/kik-8-3-1-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.