Jump to content
IGNORED

Anonymous are apparently going to kill facebook on Saturday


Guest boo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem? :emotawesomepm9:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since they can't take on the Zetas in Mexico, I guess they have to troll something to prove they're still relevant...

 

Yeah, considering that I've reports pertaining that Anonymous would attack the Mexican drug cartel, Fox News and Facebook on November 5th I have a feeling that they will not successfully effect any of them.

 

Sounds like Anonymous is so anonymous and fragmented that they can't even plan what to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem? :emotawesomepm9:

 

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2395812,00.asp#fbid=XDV7uE2s6M7

 

dude posted the vid yesterday, so this is still supposedly happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem? :emotawesomepm9:

Didn't hear shit about the Zetas but i still don't understand why you say they are irrelevant. Thanks for insulting me though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since they can't take on the Zetas in Mexico, I guess they have to troll something to prove they're still relevant...

 

Yeah, considering that I've reports pertaining that Anonymous would attack the Mexican drug cartel, Fox News and Facebook on November 5th I have a feeling that they will not successfully effect any of them.

 

Sounds like Anonymous is so anonymous and fragmented that they can't even plan what to do.

 

They supposedly called off the attack on the Zetas - are you saying it's back on now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem? :emotawesomepm9:

Didn't hear shit about the Zetas but i still don't understand why you say they are irrelevant. Thanks for insulting me though.

 

Well, don't you think you deserved it just a teeny bit after your "OMFG JOYREX HOW DARE YOU INSULT ANONYMMMUS TEH ELETE HAXORS OF DE WURLD JEEBUS FARKING KEERYEST!!!" comment?

 

Why they hatin on facebook.

 

I think taking down Farcebook is akin to the kiddie porn website ring they took down recently... a public service, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is how you read my post then you're just being a child. You frustrated me so i said "jesus fucking christ". For all I care anonymous and everyone involved could be dead.

 

Stop it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since they can't take on the Zetas in Mexico, I guess they have to troll something to prove they're still relevant...

 

Yeah, considering that I've reports pertaining that Anonymous would attack the Mexican drug cartel, Fox News and Facebook on November 5th I have a feeling that they will not successfully effect any of them.

 

Sounds like Anonymous is so anonymous and fragmented that they can't even plan what to do.

 

They supposedly called off the attack on the Zetas - are you saying it's back on now?

 

No, I read today that it was off too. And rightly so, they're fucking with genuinely dangerous men with Mexican drug dealers, not just faceless corporations.

 

But over the last 2 weeks I've read of 3 different targets on Nov 5th. And most proclamations have come from different channels. Maybe their communication portals get shut down frequently, but it's more likely that there are too many different controllers and ideas within Anonymous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since they can't take on the Zetas in Mexico, I guess they have to troll something to prove they're still relevant...

 

Yeah, considering that I've reports pertaining that Anonymous would attack the Mexican drug cartel, Fox News and Facebook on November 5th I have a feeling that they will not successfully effect any of them.

 

Sounds like Anonymous is so anonymous and fragmented that they can't even plan what to do.

 

They supposedly called off the attack on the Zetas - are you saying it's back on now?

 

No, I read today that it was off too. And rightly so, they're fucking with genuinely dangerous men with Mexican drug dealers, not just faceless corporations.

 

But over the last 2 weeks I've read of 3 different targets on Nov 5th. And most proclamations have come from different channels. Maybe their communication portals get shut down frequently, but it's more likely that there are too many different controllers and ideas within Anonymous.

 

Ah, I see. Perhaps if they organized better, in some sort of hierarchical structure... oh, wait...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait - I frustrated YOU and you're saying I'M being childish?

 

LOL to that!

please explain? i'm just saying i wasn't name calling, and not resorting to childish tactics? adults still curse in frustration or am i missing something? or am i not allowed to become frustrated? you could have just let me know that the zeta thing was in the news and that i was mis- or un- informed but instead you started mocking me. i don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not be coy here - you laid down the attitude (frustrated by my statement or not), and you didn't expect a similar reaction?

 

Had you made your point clearer, I probably wouldn't have responded with such vitriol. Sorry about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joyrex was condescending and sharp, but his insults seemed more funny than they were offensive.

 

Edit: He wasn't funny, of course, but I could see that he was trying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.