Jump to content
IGNORED

watmm photographers


keltoi

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 271
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest uptown devil

cool, thanks for the suggestions. the tokina 11-17mm f2.8 looks pretty awesome and the reviews are solid as well. my only issue with it is that it doesn't have an internal focus motor, which means it won't auto-focus on the d5000. i haven't done much manual focusing, as all three of my lenses are AF-S, so i really don't know how much of a limitation this poses as. i'm thinking it would be worth it for how fast and wide the lens is.. i probably should learn how to manually focus anyway, and i imagine in the (distant) future i will upgrade to a full frame sensor body capable of auto-focusing on AF lenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cool, thanks for the suggestions. the tokina 11-17mm f2.8 looks pretty awesome and the reviews are solid as well. my only issue with it is that it doesn't have an internal focus motor, which means it won't auto-focus on the d5000. i haven't done much manual focusing, as all three of my lenses are AF-S, so i really don't know how much of a limitation this poses as. i'm thinking it would be worth it for how fast and wide the lens is.. i probably should learn how to manually focus anyway, and i imagine in the (distant) future i will upgrade to a full frame sensor body capable of auto-focusing on AF lenses.

 

just use manual focus; the focus ring on the Tokina is HUGE and really smooth, I've never used it on autofocus - not due to focus speed but just for how painless it is on manual

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wider you go the larger your dof will be which in turn makes missing focus a lot harder... so on the 11mm end at f8 you should be able to shoot just about anything at infinity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest uptown devil

excellent, i think i'm convinced. hopefully i'll get some money to put towards it for my bday in a few weeks. thanks for the help guys.

 

vertical do you have any shots you could post that you took with the tokina?

 

goffer, i'm still loving that nikkor 35mm f1.8g you recommended me. appreciate the help time and time again. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had this pill-container thing for 5 years and only today noticed quite how internets savvy it was -

 

wtf.jpg

 

(apologies, not completely related to this topic - erm just pretend it's a visual representation of something taken at f2.2 @ 50mm, iso100 ....)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys, I'm interested in making short videos. Can you guys give me suggestions for a good quality, but affordable camera?

 

Something with the quality of the video that Mirezzi posted...

 

For those interested in that, here is literally the very first thing I shot in video with my D7000. Of note, you can't shoot handheld without producing unbearably jittery footage. I used my neck strap's tension to fake a third point of contact. Also, I shot this in 1/320 shutter speed; hence, it looks like Saving Private Ryan, which is rather ridiculous.

 

This is a 720p down-rez, but nonetheless it gives you an idea of how nice things can look.

 

http://vimeo.com/16506100

 

EDIT: IPB doesn't recognize Vimeo embeds with media tag? Bullshit.

 

I know a little about photography, but nearly nothing about video/film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for you, I suggest a gopro. you could prolly get some good mountain biking and pov porn shots holmes.

 

http://gopro.com/

 

That's great quality for only $300. I'll consider getting one.

 

My amateur porn is about to get kicked up a notch :sup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest uptown devil

awesome, thanks vert. great looking shots, especially the last one. did you use a filter to get such an even exposure between the land and the sky?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you need a hi def digital to capture some of these really crisp bright pictures or is it all in the lens?

 

it's typically a combination of both camera and lens. a great camera is only as good as the lens in front of it, and vice versa. although, one could argue how much of a difference it ultimately makes when we're posting images 800x600 on the internet. the bright colors typically come photoshop, but are also dependent on the camera and lens. most people like to have their naked/raw shots to be as neutral/mild as possible so that their left with a more leeway in direction when it comes to editing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you need a hi def digital to capture some of these really crisp bright pictures or is it all in the lens?

 

what's this in reference to? I know that for my camera, I really wish I had the 11-16 Tokina a year or so ago when I was overseas. It is definitely sharper compared to the kits lens (Canon 18-55).. especially when in manual focus, as I don't notice any fringing (chromatic aberration) at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest uptown devil

The other day I encounted the most self-satisfied smug duck I'd ever laid my eyes upon:

 

post-19-0-77786700-1317384502_thumb.jpg

 

Honestly, who does he think he is ?!

that is a smug-ass duck. really interesting picture though, i like the coloring. how did you get so close?

 

 

this is from my parents' cottage on conesus lake, ny:

 

conesussunset800.jpg

 

the ducks there have been inbreeding for generations, and as a result have lost their natural intuition to fly south.. they just sit in the middle of the lake all winter, herded into a gigantic cluster which stops the ice from forming.

 

i could go on and on about the fucking ducks on that lake. ridiculous creatures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had this pill-container thing for 5 years and only today noticed quite how internets savvy it was -

 

wtf.jpg

 

(apologies, not completely related to this topic - erm just pretend it's a visual representation of something taken at f2.2 @ 50mm, iso100 ....)

 

 

Hey, well done dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how did you get so close?

A couple of months ago I picked up a second hand Canon 75-300 f/4-5.6 lens for about 60 quid. Really enjoy using it and have no idea why it received such bad reviews. This is probably my favourite photo I've taken with it so far:

 

squirrel.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.