Squee Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 So, there's been a lot of buzz about the new Michael Jackson song "Hollywood Tonight" because a lot of people don't believe it's actually him singing. Hollywood Tonight on Grooveshark What do you guys think? It does sound a bit strange. It's almost as if his voice is too deep or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest futuregirlfriend Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 I could believe it, but at the same time wouldn't be surprised if there was something fishy going on. I only had a quick listen but I can hear some autotuney warble, so maybe it is him, just fucked around with a bit. I'd imagine he left a lot of scraps so I expect some more rudderless pap like this and questionable 2pacish duets. Oh there was a youtube video, something like "the manful voice of michael jackson" where he spoke in his natural voice. Perhaps it's still on yt in some form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joyrex Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 I could believe it, but at the same time wouldn't be surprised if there was something fishy going on. I only had a quick listen but I can hear some autotuney warble, so maybe it is him, just fucked around with a bit. I'd imagine he left a lot of scraps so I expect some more rudderless pap like this and questionable 2pacish duets. Oh there was a youtube video, something like "the manful voice of michael jackson" where he spoke in his natural voice. Perhaps it's still on yt in some form. "The manful voice of MJ" versus the voice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
data Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 that's not michael jackson, the only time it sounds like him is in the chorus. edit: this track sucks, can't stand that snare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest analogue wings Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 I could believe it, but at the same time wouldn't be surprised if there was something fishy going on. I only had a quick listen but I can hear some autotuney warble, so maybe it is him, just fucked around with a bit. I'd imagine he left a lot of scraps so I expect some more rudderless pap like this and questionable 2pacish duets. Oh there was a youtube video, something like "the manful voice of michael jackson" where he spoke in his natural voice. Perhaps it's still on yt in some form. "The manful voice of MJ" versus the voice? yeah cos only dirty pervert paedophiles modulate their voice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoodie Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 i don't even listen to michael jackson that much and i can tell that's not him singing. besides, the song is shit, even for a pop song. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest analogue wings Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6Q1JPaQ56k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joyrex Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 I could believe it, but at the same time wouldn't be surprised if there was something fishy going on. I only had a quick listen but I can hear some autotuney warble, so maybe it is him, just fucked around with a bit. I'd imagine he left a lot of scraps so I expect some more rudderless pap like this and questionable 2pacish duets. Oh there was a youtube video, something like "the manful voice of michael jackson" where he spoke in his natural voice. Perhaps it's still on yt in some form. "The manful voice of MJ" versus the voice? yeah cos only dirty pervert paedophiles modulate their voice He might have... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest analogue wings Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 1. it's the exact same register he sings in on billie jean 2. the lasd spent millions of cracker redneck bigot dollars trying to prove he was a pedo and they didnt prove anything whatsoever. because it was a racist stitch up. they guy was weird. he was an easy mark. 3. dicks still think its cool to be all lol paedophile about a dead guy. fuck that. 4. r kelly fucks a 14 year old on video and everybody's cool with that. go america Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Member Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 didn't he also piss on her? I think the problem with jacko is that people think he touches little white boys and turns them gay. If he was only pissing on black girls it would be fine. edited out some of the stupid shit, sorry, alcoholized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awepittance Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 i still think michael jackson was a ancient rome style high society pedophile however it doesn't make me like his music any less and i don't really care. (in fact most of his most convincing cases of man-boy relationships were with males of 14-18 years old, a specific case of a scottish kid who interviewed him during Off the Wall and stayed in contact) Has anybody seen the Louie Theroux documentary about Michael Jackson? It's probably the most compelling insight into his life that i've ever seen, at the end he interviews Joe Jackson with this classic line of questioning Louie: Michael says that he's so nervous to see you, that before he'll meet you he has to regurgitate Joe Jackson: Hehe, well he can regurgitate all the way to the bank for all i care! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Member Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Yeah, I've seen that. He's a mean fuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dr. Bunsen Honeydew Posted December 11, 2010 Share Posted December 11, 2010 verdict: not michael jackson. case closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.