Jump to content
IGNORED

Police Abuse of Power Thread #20067b


Guest The Vidiot

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest hahathhat

A DUDE IS SUMMBUDDY THAT WORKS ON A RANCH

 

i will show this dude the utmost respect by loading that into my sampler

only the good shit goes in there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest The Vidiot

lol. What does this guy say to his wife every morning when he gets up out of bed.

 

Mrs. Riveri: Honey, just call in sick today. We can spend the day in bed fucking around.

 

Officer Riveri: Dammit Sue, it's a warzone out there. I can't just stay in bed with so much injustice in the world. I'm a police officer for Christ's sake. It's a dirty job, but someone has to protect our citizens from skateboards and...and...I can't even say it...*sob*

 

Mrs. Riveri: It's alright sweety, go on.

 

Officer Riveri: And...moving boxes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Eris Siva

Indeedy, sir. I like to watch them progress from beginning to end. A lot of times they stop reporting on important ones the closer they get to getting passed. Then, its too lat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Eris Siva

Well, the new passports already have RFID chips, but I don't think they're forcing anyone to inject them yet.

However, the RealID is definitely coming. I linked to it at the bottom of this post.

 

For those too lazy to find it:

http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-bl...ntrusion_o.html

 

With the announcement last month by Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff of the final implementing regulations for the much-delayed Real ID Act, the debate over this thinly veiled national identification card project moved into high gear.

 

The federal government for several years now has been fighting a guerrilla action with citizen groups and a number of state legislatures over imposing on the states and the citizenry this privacy-intrusive and costly mandate. With the announcement Jan. 11 of the final regulations, the debate is fully joined and pits those who support the principle of states’ rights against the legions of Big Government advocates.

 

Big Government advocates are personified by the current Bush administration, favoring central control of virtually every facet of activity in our society, from education to transportation and from the plumbing in our bathrooms to the bulbs in our lamps. While the Real ID debate shares some elements with its sister debate concerning voter ID, mixing the two as if two sides of the same coin dilutes the host of fundamental constitutional concerns and responsibilities affected by the Real ID Act program now being forced down the throats of the states.

 

Let’s leave aside for the moment the underlying federalism question — where does the federal government get the power to dictate to the states who can get a driver’s license? — to focus on civil liberties that would be undercut by the Real ID Act.

 

If, as proposed in the law, a person must have a Real ID Act-compliant card in order to access a federal building, access any regulated or interstate mode of transportation, or obtain any federal benefit, then we have surrendered to the federal government (that is, federal bureaucrats) the power to deny citizens all manner of activities guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. Consider:

 

*

 

A person not possessing a Real ID Act-compliant identification card could not enter any federal building, or an office of his or her congressman or senator or the U.S. Capitol. This effectively denies that person their fundamental rights to assembly and to petition the government as guaranteed in the First Amendment.

*

 

A person seeking to exercise their right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment could henceforth be denied that ability if they do not possess a precious Real ID card, because the federal bureaucracy known as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives probably will decree that such a form of identification is necessary to meet federal requirements for purchasing a firearm.

*

 

Very possibly the Real ID card will be required in order to vote in any election for federal office.

*

 

A veteran may be denied access to a VA hospital because he or she lacks the requisite Real ID card, perhaps because they did not have the money required to purchase it or because they could not locate the background forms the Department of Homeland Security required to obtain one.

*

 

A business traveler, unable to afford to travel by private jet, is denied the ability to make a living because their job requires air travel and they do not have a Real ID card — even though they demonstrably pose no danger whatsoever to their fellow travelers.

*

 

Even though individual states, such as Georgia, may provide greater legal protection for private information of its residents than other states or the federal government, this will mean nothing in the Real ID Act world, because all the data under that law will be subject to the lower federal standards, thereby subjecting residents to a higher likelihood of identity theft than they would risk under the laws of their state.

*

 

And, they would have no recourse to correct erroneous data, or prevent identity theft pursuant to the Real ID regulations.

 

On the other side of the ledger, arguing in favor of this intrusive and expensive federal mandate, are hollow promises of “security” — not freedom or liberty — but “safety,” the promise of which trumps all else in this post-9/11 world, at least for this Congress and this administration. I, for one, commend the state of Georgia and those other states that are standing against this assault on states’ rights and the Bill of Rights.

 

 

The thing is, do you think that it would even have to reach the legislature? I mean - ever since Bush started passing those PS left and right, he's been pretty cavalier. He could just up and make it law, and veto any opposition. He's done it before, he'll do it again.

Plus, he pretty much ignores anything he doesn't agree with - even if its law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goddammit.

 

More police brutality on woman

 

Before meeting Officer Willis

2nvcvvc.jpg

 

After

x40xti.jpg

 

 

the fucking cop turned the security camera off during the beating

15xwhvn.jpg

 

When paramedics arrive, they asked one of the officers what happened, to which he replied, "she fell down."

 

:ohmy: i cannot fucking believe he said that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...
Guest Wall Bird

Just a quick show of hands. Does anyone here like the police or, rather, feel as if they still do more good than harm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.