lumpenprol Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 maybe that's the best solution. Jr can tell us when he feels one of his "ban fits" coming on, then we elect who gets sacrificed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hahathhat Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 it's not that i don't like sirch. i'd just rather have kakapo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sirch Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 sorry sirch ! but can we trade sirch for kakapo make a poll . lol aslong as i'm not banned from the subforums i don't really care tbh :) also, bring back the downloads section!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that, the subforums and the new releases section, was/is why a lot of people still come here!! truth hurts i guess. *shrug* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hahathhat Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 i would never start such a poll it's more like portal 2. i'm wheatley, and you, sirch, are space core Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sirch Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 over my head as i'm not a gamer. but props, nonetheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hahathhat Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 sirch is inspace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sirch Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 sirch is inspace. nice, nice. still searching............... outta space and inner space........ with a game face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sprigg Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 /thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J3FF3R00 Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 somebody just lock this shit already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Npoess Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 A subforum for banned users? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Braintree Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 Kakapo was a dick, but I kind of admired him for his temerity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Braintree Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 Also, that Hitler 'Downfall' parody he made complaining about the LTM forum was hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Calx Sherbet Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 my point is i dont mind you banning people capriciously as long as you do it openly. banning people under the guise that it somehow benfits the forum (when in fact it's just because you don't like them) means there is one less person to contribute and donate to this site and every time someone is banned this site gets a little bit shittier. What, do you want some sort of 'public execution' of sorts where the accused crimes are posted for all to see? that would be awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Calx Sherbet Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 i guarantee five more members are getting banned by the end of the year, at least that would happen in any given year. please think about what you just said. ten you grow up, get wiser, be less twatish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCM Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 as some of you may have noticed I took issue with sirch pretty much from day one. he is a comprehensive twat. unforunately he won't be reading this as he has me on ignore. kakapo on the other hand was a great and very witty member who I shall genuinely miss around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joyrex Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 perhaps bans for serious offenses should start off at 1 month ban from watmm, and upon return from 1 month ban continue as follows: 2nd offense - 2 month ban 3rd offense - 3 month ban 4th offense - 6 month ban 5th offense - 12 month ban thoughts? A bit too lenient, and if people knew they had several 'chances', they'd either see how much they could get away with before the hammer dropped, or not take the early warnings seriously. Typically I will warn someone, and if it's repeated, tell them they will either be banned or suspended the next time something happens. Very rarely will I outright ban or suspend unless it's something really egregious. Support the idea of suspensions, it's a reasonable middle ground and I'm honestly baffled as to why JR doesn't already employ them I do - and I'll see about using it more in future, but an outright ban usually has good merit behind it, so I don't know what a suspension would do in place of that other than giving the offender a second chance, which if they're being banned, they probably already had enough of those or did something serious enough there shouldn't be a second chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KY Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 i like the idea of three-warns-and-you're-suspended, three-suspensions-and-you're banned idea (after the three warns/initial suspension, any additional offense would immediately result in a suspension rather than another warning). WAIT WTF WHY ARE WE LIVING IN DIS POLICE STATE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boxus Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 he is a comprehensive twat. if i was a twat i'd want to be a comprehensive one. tie all those loose ends together and really get being a twat done in full. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCM Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 well, that's sirch in a nutshell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joyrex Posted May 5, 2011 Share Posted May 5, 2011 OK, since this really isn't going anywhere, I'm gonna close the topic - anyone with specific questions regarding kakapo's banning or ideas on how to improve the warning system can PM me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.