- NATO has actually become a stronger armed version of the UN peacekeeping forces - Balkan interventions in 1995 and 1999 inand the deployment of forces into Afghanistan (only time NATO has actually "gone to war" when an ally was attacked) being the main examples.
- US/EU/Russia alignment was in the early to mid-90s a likely outcome, the US and Russia even had friendly military exercises briefly, but this has long since melted. nationalism in Russia (expand borders, pull East Europe back into their sphere of influence, etc) and Russia's much more aggressive anti-terrorist methods (install puppet states, crush all threats, make allies with Iran and Syria as needed, only focus on borders and/or strategic allies) made them diverge from the US and EU.
- South America and Africa: China is already courting both. For example they are building another canal in Nicaragua, or at least trying to, that would compete and supersede the Panama Canal.
- Brazil and India IIRC are essentially trying to stay independent and self-sufficient, even form a third way from either Russia or China or the US/EU
- Africa - we should invest more but it's unlikely the US or EU will considering the rise of isolationism and anti-foreign sentiment in general. France interventions to stabilize places like Chad and Mali might go away completely if LePen wins (I assume, actually not sure if she's anti-interventionism)
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/feb/10/european-union-eu-pledges-225m-rescue-package-newly-democratic-the-gambia-adama-barrow
Gambia isn't exactly the most problematic country but it's a start/something.
