"people who kill people while they really shouldn't kill people imo" thread

[Guest zaphod]

was really hoping for a rolling primate bullshit

[SR4]

primate bullshit

[usagi]

bullmat primshite

[Guest A/D]

Primebull shitmat

[Berk]

 

limpyloo is a populist twat, there i said it.

 

You know "populist" isn't an insult, right?

 

It's like calling someone a "handsome twat" or a "thoughtful twat"...

 

lol

[lumpenprol]

pimshit primatusalvo

[xox]

primestep bullwallet

 

da fak is going on here?! ru all mad?!

[DerWaschbar]

:'(

[SR4]

People Kill People

So why should it be?

That you and I

We get along so

Awfully?

[chenGOD]

Primebull shitate

[delet...]

It's funny, i can't rightclick on SR4's sig pic. I wanted to grab it to do a joke review of the sitters character's as judged by their expressions.

 

Marx - melancholic but chuffed about something in the background of his mind, beef and yorkshire pudding for supper perhaps. His left eye appears happier than his right, magical irony right there.

Lenin - resembles the gangster that he was.

Mao - eyes say serenity, but mouth can't hide the hint of haughty disapproving scowl, that permeates in an upward drift the lower half of his face.

 

Of course reading faces can be as much an illumination of the viewer's psychological state and (perhaps but not in this case) hidden biases.

[lumpenprol]

what's the quote? "Up to your 30's you have the face God has given you. After that, you get the face you deserve"

 

most people do have faces they deserve, though there are certainly some babyface killers out there. I have one Asian acquaintance who has this round, dimple-cheeked, smiley face but is a completely manipulative asshole.

 

But yeah, analyzing faces is fun.

[Guest zaphod]

is that like how kanye has a "gay face"?

[Guest A/D]

That's interesting. I find it a lot easier to analyze behavior than faces.

[Guest zaphod]

that's because behavior is real, analyzing faces is something crazy people do

[Guest A/D]

Zaphod, have you ever read Operators and Things? I think you'd make a skilled hook operator. Not really in a bad way, but with an edge when you want it.

 

It's a fucking awesome book though.

[Guest zaphod]

i have read that and i can only take that as an insult.

[Guest A/D]

That's fair. I've been thinking a lot about that book and I think hooks can be neutral or even good for the person they're used on. I'm thinking of hooks here as a symbol for finding someone's motivation. Sometimes I think you try to win an argument emotionally rather than with facts, which is what I was getting at. But I have no way of knowing if you're a corporate cutthroat, and that's not what I wanted to imply.

[Guest zaphod]

definitely true, at least on this forum. but keep in mind, watmm is not a social outlet for me, more of a way to entertain and distract myself from actual, real things i'm supposed to be doing. some of which are intellectually rigorous. i like hopping on board the argument train just to see what kind of reaction i can get and to find out just how strong a person's convictions really are. though it's also often laziness on my part because i can't be bothered to actually, you know, research things. if you guys want facts about political economy in the middle east, i guess we can talk. but this is the internet after all and probably 95 percent of my posts are made with one hand fondling my dick while i switch back and forth between eighteen tabs of streaming porn.

 

also not sure i was arguing in this thread. i suppose my statement is kind of insulting toward lumpenprol, but i'd like to clarify. i think you can read emotions from a face, obviously, and it's a cute quote to say at dinner parties, but i don't think any insight can really be gleaned from someone's facial structure or "the lines around their eyes" or whatever. i think that's kind of dangerous and involves lots of personal projection and bias. best to judge someone from their actions, not how they look. but then, lumpy was probably saying that with tongue firmly in cheek and here i am, taking it seriously.

[MisterE]

yeah.

 

 

so anyways, i think people definitely should kill poeple

 

wait shouldn't

definitelly shouldnt

imnsho

 

or if they really want to i guess there... wouldn't be any harm in it would there?

 

wait! of course there would be! were talking about a persons life here! good god!

 

but wait! did i say god? i meant to say-

jesus christ in hell almighty, son of a bitch god damn!

 

dont kill, its bad!

 

oh man what a tricky issue

 

wait again! a thought! could we maybe kill SOME people at least?? like bad or ugly ones?

hmm...

nah no hold on, that could be a slippery slope. then some wise guy with a silver tongue might talk us into killing other people too, like the uh.. mentally um..

wait, who SHOULDNT we kill, exactly? i think that list would be easier to make, maybe?

[lumpenprol]

Well I forgot to mention it helps to have a caliper ready to check the dimensions of the skull, duh.

[MisterE]

great idea! we measure skulls and then we kill or dont kill based on measurements! brilliant!

 

but which group do we not kill? big craniums or little?

[delet...]

It's more subtle than that, first you have to figure out which continent that they hail from. Then you get measuring and interpret your results in light of that.

[Guest A/D]

Great post Zaphod! Though you did basically call yourself a hook operator, lol. Thanks for representing.

[Guest]